(1)
We all like to feel needed. But new rearch suggests having a n of purpo is good for our health, too.
In a study of 7,000 people, tho with the strongest n of direction in life were over 70 percent less likely to suffer a stroke.
The rearchers 1 电脑屏幕切换for other aggravating factors such as blood pressure and alcohol u and believe the 2 comes through regulating the immune system.
It has long been thought that 3 meaningful activity after retirement is important for physical and mental health—which often declines 4 soon after retirement.
But while past rearch focud on the 5 effects of negative psychological traits, such as depression and anxiety, new rearch is investigating how positive traits, such as 6 , protect against illness.
形容艰难的成语
In the recent study, men and women aged 50 and over were 7 for four to five years and completed psychological tests while rearchers recorded strokes.
The results show that the higher someone’s n of purpo, the lower their risk of a stroke. Tho with the greatest n of purpo were 73 percent less likely to suffer a stroke compared to tho with lowest.
Other rearch has shown that positive mood can lower levels of the stress hormone cortisol(荷尔蒙皮质醇), also 8 in stroke.
“This is significant as we have a (n) 9 population and it helps show what behaviors prevent people from getting ill,” says Cary Cooper, professor of health psychology at Lancaster University. “Maybe 10 is not good for some.”
A | accounted | B | Aging | C | ambition | D | damaging |
E | decreasing | F | Dramatically | G | effect | H 人像摄影图片 | 晚年生活gradually |
I | implicated | J | Optimism | K | outstanding | L | pursuing |
M | retirement绿化资质 | N | Searched | O | tracked | | |
| | | | | | | |
(2)
The concept of man versus machine is at least as old as the industrial revolution, but this phenomenon tends to be most acutely felt during economic downturns and slow recoveries. Since technology has such a big 11 for eating up human jobs, this phenomenon will continue to structure our economy in ways we can’t immediately foree.
When there is exponential (指数的) 12 in the price and performance of technology, jobs that were once thought to be 13 from automation suddenly become threatened. This is a powerful argument, and a scary one. And yet, john Hagel, author of The Power of Pull and other books, says the argument miss the reason why the jobs are so vulnerable to technology in the first place.
Hagel says we have designed jobs in the U.S. that tend to be scripted and highly 14 ones that leave no room for individual initiative or creativity. In short, the are the types of jobs that machines can警示录心得体会 15 much better than human beings. That is how we have put
a giant 16 sign on the backs of American workers.
It’s time to 17 the formula for how work is conducted, since we are still relying on a very 20th century 18 of work, Hagel says. In our 19 changing economy, we more than ever need people in the workplace who can take initiative and exerci their imagination to respond to 20 events. That’s not something machines are good at. They are designed to perfume very predictable activities.
A | appetite | B | Calculate | C | competition | D | distinct |
E | exceedingly | F 鼻塞流涕 | Immune | G | improvement | H | norm |
I | notion | J | Perform | K | rapidly | L | reinvent |
M | standardized | N | Target | O | unexpected | | |
| | | | | | | |
TEXT A
Before my many years’ rvice in restaurant, I attended a top science university. At that time, I was finishing the project that would win me my professorship. In the end, it resulte
d in my becoming a kitchen employee.
My forty-cond birthday had made a lonely visit the week before, and I was once again by mylf in the flat. Like countless other mornings, I ordered a donut from the toaster. “Yes, sir!” it replied with robotic relish, and I began the day’s work on the project. It was a magnificent machine, the thing I was making—capable of transferring the minds of any two beings into each other’s bodies.
宿州电大As the toaster began rving my donut on to a plate, I realized the project was in fact ready foe testing. I took out the duck and the cat—which I had bought for this purpo—from their containers, and t about calibrating the machine in their direction. Once ready, I leant against the table, holding the donut I was too excited to eat, and initiated the transfer quence. As expected, the machine whirred and hummed into action, my nerves tingling at its synthetic sounds.
The machine hushed, extraction and injection pipes poid, scrutinizing its targets. The cat, though, was suddenly gripped by terrible alarm. The brute leapt into the air, flinging it
lf onto the machine. I watched in horror as the nozzles swung towards me; and, with a terrible, dizzy whorl of colours, felt my mind wrenched from its sockets.
When I awoke, moments later, I noticed first that I was two feet shorter. Then I realized the lack of mu limbs, and finally it occurred to me that I was a toaster. I saw immediately the solution to the situation—the machine could easily rever the transfer—but was then struck by utter inability to carry this out.
After some consideration, using what I suppo must be the toaster’s onboard computer, I devid a strategy for rescue. I began to familiarize mylf with my new body: the grill, the bread bin, the speaker and the spring mechanism. Through the device’s eye—with which it rved its creations—I could e the internal telephone on the wall. Aiming carefully, I began pushing slices of bread at it. The toaster was fed by a large stock of the stuff, yet as more and more bounced lamely off the phone, I began to fear its exhaustion.
