2020年英语一真题
Section Ⅰ U of English
Directions:
Read the following text. Choo the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)
Even if families don't sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions:the Sunday roast. 1 a cold winter's day, few culinary pleasures can 卢熊 2 it. Yet as we report now, the food police are determined that this 3 should be rendered yet another quality pleasure 4 to damage our health.
The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has 5 a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked 6 high temperatures. This means that people should 7 crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin- crust pizzas and o
nly 8 toast their bread.But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? 9 帕台农神庙>有奖竞答 studies have shown that acrylamide can cau neurological damage in mice, there is no 10 evidence that it caus cancer in humans.
Scientists say the compound is 11 to cau cancer but have no hard scientific proof 12 the precautionary principle, it could be argued that it is 13 to follow the FSA advice. 14 , it was rumoured that smoking caud cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a 15 .
Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be 16 up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? 17 , the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods 18 ,but to reduce their lifetime intake. However, their 小熊猫吃什么 19 risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective.Constant health scares just 20 with one listening.
1. [A] In [B] Towards [C] On [D]Till
2. [A] match [B] express [C] satisfy [D] influence
3. [A] patience [B] enjoyment [C] surpri [D] concern
4. [A] intensified [B] privileged [C] compelled [D] guaranteed
5. [A] issued [B] received [C] compelled [D] guaranteed
6. [A] under [B] at [C] for [D] by
7. [A] forget [B] regret [C] finish [D] avoid
8. [A] partially [B] regular [C] easily [D] initially
9. [A] Unless [B] Since [C] If [D] While
or用法
10.[A] condary [B] external [C] conclusive [D] negative
11.[A] insufficient [B] bound [C] likely [D] slow
12.[A] On the basis of [B] At the cost of [C] In addition to [D] In contrast to描写绿色的诗句
13.[A] interesting [B] advisable [C] urgent [D] fortunate
14.[A] As usual [B] In particular [C] By definition [D] After all
15.[A] remblance [B] combination [C] connection [D] pattern
16.[A] made [B] rved [C] saved [D] ud
怎样去虾线
17.[A] To be fair [B] For instance [C] To be brief [D] In general
18.[A] reluctantly [B] entirely [C] gradually [D] carefully
19.[A] promi [B] experience [C]campaign [D] competition
20.[A] follow up [B] pick up [C]open up [D] end up
SectionⅡ Reading Comprehension
Part A Directions:
Read the following four texts. Answer the questions after each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)
Text 1
A group of Labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “town of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017, and has been awarded to Coventry for 2021. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in £220m of investment and an avalanche of arts, ought not to be confined to cities. Britain’s towns, it is true, are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bid to beat their bigger competitors. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.
Some might e the proposal as a booby prize for the fact that Britain is no longer able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Liverpool in 2008. A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of lf-celebration in its desp
eration to reinvent itlf for the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows what will follow-village of culture? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?
It is also wi to recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and washes out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community. The really successful holders of such titles are tho that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the lf-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light. It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private ctor, community groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgow's year as European capital of culture can certainly be en as one of a complex ries of factors that have turned the city into the powerhou of art, music and theatre that it remains长沙露营 today.
