摘要
我国第一部系统的语法著作--《马氏文通》就已经关注到形容词带宾语现象。自此，形容词带宾语现象在学界一直是学界研究的热点话题。学者们目前已经对形容词带宾语现象在语义、结构等方面进行了广泛而深入的研究。本论文将以认知语言学为理论框架，探讨汉语形容词带宾语结构的形成机制，能带宾语的形容词的类型，形容词带宾语后的意义等问题。
基于Goldberg（1995，2006）对构式的定义，本论文确立了形容词带宾语结构是一个表示致使意义的独立构式，其中形容词以单音节与双音节为主。受动词带宾语构式的压制，在形容词带宾语构式中，形容词被压制为及物动词，转喻状态变化的过程。在识解致使关系事件过程中，人们倾向于将注意力投射到原因和结果两个焦点上，而选择性地忽略致使的具体过程及方式，体现在语言上，表现为对致使原因及其结果的凸显和编码。
依据Talmy（2000b）的两种基本致使事件情形，本论文将形容词带宾语构式分为两种子构式。第一种子构式表达致使结果意义，通常语序为：致使事件导致结果事件，使主体产生具象的变化结果。另一种子构式表达致使情感意义，通常语序为：结果事件由致使事件引起，使主体产生抽象的情感变化。
根据Rappaport Hovav and Levin（2010）对等级性和非等级性形容词特性的分类方式，以及方式义与结果义互补假设理论，本论文发现只有等级性形容词才能通过构式压制成为结果动词，表示实体的变化
情况。而非等级性形容词隐含方式意义，无法进入表示致使结果的形容词带宾语构式。
关键词：汉语形宾构式；认知语言学；致使事件；等级性形容词
ABSTRACT
Ma’s Grammar, the first systematic and comprehensive grammar book on Mandarin Ch ine, has touched upon the “Adjective + Object” structure in Chine. Since then, the “Adjective + Object” structure has been a hot issue in the academic circles. Scholars have done extensive and deep rearches on the “Adjective + Object” structure in terms of its mantics and structure. In the framework of Cognitive Linguistics, this thesis attempts to explore the formation mechanism of the “Adjective + Object” construction, the types of adjectives that can take objects, the meaning that the adjectives express after taking objects and other related issues.
In accordance with the definition of construction propod by Goldberg (1995, 2006), this thesis establishes that the “Adjective + Object” structure is an independent construction, conveying the causat ive meaning. Coerced by the “Verb + O bject” construction, adjectives in the “Adjective + Object” construction are converted into transitive verbs and metonymically stand for the process of change of state. When construing a causative event, we tend to fix our attention on the cau and re
sult of the event, and lectively ignore the specific causal process and manner. Thus the cau and result are profiled and encoded.
According to the two causative situations put forward by Talmy (2000b), this thesis classifies the “Adjective + Object” construction into two sub-constructions. One express the meaning of CAUSE-to-BECOME and its quence is from causing event to caud event, making the entity occur with concrete change. The other express the meaning of CAUSE-to-FEEL and the quence is from caud event to causing event, making the entity occur with abstract emotional change.
Finally, in accordance with the classification of scalar adjectives and nonscalar adjectives and the manner/result complementarity hypothesis propod by Rappaport Hovav and Levin (2010), this thesis finds that only scalar adjectives can be coerced into result verbs to show the change of entity. Non-scalar adjectives only implies the meaning of manner and cannot be coerced into the “Adjective + Object” construction.六点定位原理
Key words:the “Adjective + Object” construction in Mandarin Chine; Cognitive Linguistics; the causal event; scalar adjectives
CONTENTS
读写结合
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................... I 摘要 ................................................................................................................ II ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................... III Chapter One INTRODUCTION . (1)
1.1 Background of the Study (1)
1.2 Significance and Objectives (3)大英死海门票
乘法结合律教案
1.3 Organization of the Thesis (4)
Chapter Two LITERATURE REVIEW (6)
2.1 The Word Class of the Adjectives in the “Adjective + Object” Structure (6)
2.1.1 Flexible U of Words (6)
2.1.2 Multi-category Words (8)
2.1.3 Fixed Class of Words (9)
2.2 Classifications Bad on Semantic Relationship (10)
2.3 Quantitative Analysis of the “Adjective + Object” Structure (11)
2.5 Explanations on the “Adjective + Object” Structure (12)
Chapter Three THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK: COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS. 14
3.1 The Term of “Construction” (14)
3.2 The Basic Views of Conceptualization (15)
3.2.1 Construal (15)
3.2.2 Windowing of Attention (17)
3.3 The Causal-Chain Event Frame (18)
3.3.1 The Definition of the Causal-Chain Event Frame (18)
3.3.2 Discontinuous Windowing in the Causal-Chain Event Frame (18)
3.3.3 The Semantics of the Causal-Chain Event Frame (19)
3.4 Manner/Result Complementarity Hypothesis (21)快递啥时候放假
3.5 Verbs of Scalar Change (23)
Chapter Four ANALYSIS OF THE “ADJECTIVE + OBJECT” CONSTRUCTION (25)
4.1 The “Adjective + Object” Construction (25)
4.1.1 The Meaning of the “Adjective + Object” Construction (25)
4.1.2 The Form of Adjectives in the “Adjective + Object” Construction (28)
4.2 The Formation Mechanism of the “Adjective + Object” Construction (31)
4.2.1 The Perspective of the “Adjective + Object” Construction (31)
4.2.2 The Mechanism of Selection in the “Adjective + Object” Construction.32
4.2.3 The Metonymic Construal of the “Adjective + Object” Construction (33)
如何更改文件后缀
4.3 The Causal-chain of the “Adjective + Object” Const ruction (35)
4.3.1 Windowing of Attention in this Construction (35)
4.3.2 The Semantics of the “Adjective + Object” Construction (37)
4.3.3 The Comparison between the Two Variants of the “Adjective + Object”
Construction (40)
4.4 The Characteristics of Adjective i n the “Adjective + Object” Construction (40)
4.4.1 Scalar Adjectives (40)
4.4.2 The Relationship between Scalar Adjectives and Result Verbs (44)
Chapter Five CONCLUSION (46)
5.1 Major Findings of the Study (46)
5.2 Implications of the Study (47)
5.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Study (47)
曹丕和曹操的关系REFERENCES (49)
List of Tables and Figures
Table 2.1 Semantic type of the “Adjective + Object” structure (11)
Table 4. 1 Comparison of monosyllabic adjectives in two structures (29)
学党史心得感悟Table 4. 2 Comparison of disyllabic adjectives in two structures (30)
Figure 3. 1 Two basic causative situations (20)
Figure 4. 1 Better rvice makes p eople’s hearts warm (31)
Figure 4. 2 Time turns cherry red and banana green (32)
Figure 4. 3 The causal relationship between “cadres” and “clean streets” (36)
Figure 4. 4 The detailed causal relationship of ntence (8) (37)
Figure 4. 5 Two basic causative situations (37)
Figure 4. 6 The causative situation of ntence (9) (38)
Figure 4. 7 The causative situation of ntence (10) (38)
Figure 4. 8 The causative situation of ntence (11) (39)
Figure 4. 9 The metonymical progression of vitamin C whitening skin (43)
