平板开不了机怎么办
42. The following appeared in the opinion ction of a national newsmagazine.
蔬菜饼的做法“To rever the deterioration of the postal rvice, the government should rai the price of postage stamps. This solution will no doubt prove effective, since the price increa will generate larger revenues and will also reduce the volume of mail, thereby eliminating the strain on the existing system and contributing to improved morale.”
Discuss how etc.
全国性新闻杂志的意见栏：
为了转变邮政服务退化的状况，政府应该提⾼邮资邮票的价格。这个解决⽅法将毫⽆疑问是有效的。因为价格提升会产⽣更⼤的收益⽽且会减少邮件数量，从⽽消除⽬前系统中存在的紧张并有助于提⾼⼠⽓
1价格提⾼带来的增加和数量减少带来的减少哪个⼤不是定数nars腮红批号
2收益增加并不⼀定就会提⾼⼠⽓，因为他们的⼯资很可能是固定⼯资⽽不是绩效⼯资。
徐艳芳
3其他⽅法可能更有效果。例如减低成本，把固定⼯资改成绩效⼯资。
1，收⼊是否会增加？因为volume会减少。
炸鸡饭
干法读后感2，⼠⽓与volume的减少是否有关系？很可能⼯资是fixed salary，不会被其他改变。
孕妇凉鞋3，是否有其他的办法？⽐如引进技术，减少成本等等。
The author concludes that a postage-stamp price increa is needed to reduce the deterioration of the postal rvice. The author reasons that raising the price of stamps will accomplish this goal becau it will generate more revenue, thereby eliminating the strain on the system. The author further reasons that a price increa will also reduce the volume of mail, thereby improving the morale of postal workers. The reasoning in this argument is problematic in three respects.
The main problem with the argument is the author’s mistaken assumption that eliminating strain on the system and improving employee morale are mutually achievable by way of an increa in stamp prices. A price increa will generate more revenue only if the volume of mail remains constant or increas. But, if the volume of mail increas or remains constant, worker morale will not be improved. On the other hand, if the price increa reduces the volume of mail, revenues may decrea, and the strain on the system will not be eliminated. Conquently, eliminating the strain on the system and improving the morale of the workers cannot both be achieved by simply raising the price of postage stamps.
打包行李Secondly, the author’s conclusion that the propod price increa is necessary to reduce deterioration of the postal rvice relies on the assumption that no other action would achieve the same result. However, the author provides no evidence to substantiate this assumption. It is possible, for example, that careful cost-cutting measures that do not decrea worker morale might achieve the same goal. It is also possible that other revenue-enhancing measures that do not undermine employee morale are available.
Thirdly, the author unfairly assumes that reducing mail volume and increasing revenues will improve employee morale. This is not necessarily the ca. It is possible that employee morale is materially improved only by other means, and that additional revenues will not be ud in ways that improve morale. It is also possible that a decrea in mail volume will result in a reduction of the size of the labor force, regardless of revenues, which in turn might undermine morale.
In conclusion, the author’s propod solution to the problem of the deterioration of the postal rvice will not work. Raising postage-stamp prices cannot bring about both of the outcomes the author identifies as being necessary to solve the problem. Before we can accept the argument, the author must modify the proposal accordingly and must provide more information about the relationship between employee morale and mail volume.
