考研英语（阅读）模拟试卷488
(总分60, 做题时间90分钟)
2. Reading Comprehension
Section II Reading Comprehension
Part ADirections: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D.
Almost every year since the end of the financial crisis has started with rosy expectations among American forecasters, and this one is no different. Stock markets are buoyant, consumer confidence is improving, and economic ers are raising their growth forecasts for 2014. America's S&P 500 share index is at a record high, after rising 30% in 2013—the biggest annual gain in almost two decades. Powered by America, global growth of clo to 社会教案小班
4%, on a purchasing-power-parity basis, ems possible. That would be nearly a full percentage point faster than 2013, and the best showing for veral years. Yet amid the new-year cheer, it is worth remembering that almost every year since the financial crisis upbeat expectations have been disappointed. The biggest danger this time round is the optimism itlf. All around the rich world, things are looking better. Britain's recovery is gathering pace. Japan's economy ems strong enough to cope with the imminent ri in its consumption tax. Even Europe's prospects are less dismal. But America is driving this recovery. America's growth rests on strong foundations. First, hou-hold and corporate balance-sheets are in good shape. Unlike Europeans, who have barely reduced their private debt, Americans have put the hangover from the financial crisis behind them. The revival in hou prices is testament to that. Second, thanks to cheap energy, years of wage restraint and a relatively weak dollar, America is competitive. The two factors **bined to produce faster job growth which, along with high er share prices, suggests stronger consumer spending and higher investment ahead. Finally, the fiscal squeeze is abating. In 2013 the federal government took 1.75% of GDP out of the economy with tax 猪和狗相配婚姻如何
大学班级工作总结
白色食品ris and spending cuts. The recently agreed budget deal will help cut the fiscal squeeze to 0.5% of GDP this year. All the factors could boost America's growth to around 3% in 2014, well above its trend rate. More spending by American firms and houholds will, in turn, buoy demand for goods and rvices from everywhere from China to Germany. America's appetite for foreign wares is not what it once was, but its economy is so big that faster spending will push up exports around the globe. The resulting support for growth will, in turn, improve domestic confidence from Europe to Japan.
1.
What can be inferred from the first two paragraphs?
A America's economy is always promising after each financial crisis.
B American people are confident in their stock market.
C Holding too high expectations for American economy is not advisable.
java配置环境变量D America’s economy will suffer another decline in 2014.
2.
Usually predictors in America think that after economic crisis, ______.
A the prospects may em hopeful
B consumers will soon become confident again
C the economy will soon become better than it once was
D it may take a long time for the economy to recover itlf
3.
The biggest threat of this economic crisis is that ______.
A financial crisis is disappointing
周记作文300字B many people have lost their jobs
C economic recovery is slow in progress
D people's expectations are too optimistic
4.
According to Paragraph 3, which one is NOT true?
A Economy in Britain is becoming better.
B Economy in Europe is not promising at all.
C American economy is on the way to recovery.
D Japan can tackle the problem of consumption tax.
5.
Which of the following is true according to the last paragraph?
A China and Germany may increa their demand.
B America's economy is not what it ud to be.
C Faster spending may decrea imports from the world.
D Countries like Europe and Japan may be more optimistic.
The new aircraft reprents a $250m bet by Bombardier that Mexico could provide not just routine labour but manufacturing that depended on high-tech materials. It placed the bet, according to Michael McAdoo, head of global strategy, becau it was eing old European rivals go bust and new ones emerging in low-cost countries such as China and India. Workers in Wichita and **plained. But Mr. McAdoo says they came to reali that if
outsourcing some manufacturing to Mexico ensured Bombardier's future, it would safeguard their own jobs for years to come. A shared concern with employment is one of the reasons that politicians are starting to pay more attention to NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement), which in recent years has been failing to live up to its early promi. Rebooting the agreement tops the agenda at the meeting of the leaders of the three countries scheduled to take place in Mexico this February. "There's a joint willingness among all three countries to relaunch the idea of North America, not just in terms of manufacturing, but in innovation and design," says Sergio Alcocer, under-cretary for North America in Mexico's foreign ministry. In May 2013 Barack Obama—who in 2007, on the campaign trail, called NAFTA a "mistake"—trumpeted cross-border trade on a visit to Mexico, noting that the United States exports more to Mexico than to the BRIC countries—Brazil, Russia, India and **bined. On a visit in September his vice-president, Joe Biden, dwelt on NAFTA's untapped potential. The trade agreement was beginning to look out of date. There needed to be freer movement of "goods, people and information" across the borders, despite curity worries. More shared infrastructure inve
stment was necessary. He acknowledged that politicians had held up such improvements: "Make us do it," he urged business people and the public. In the United States, the potential of clor integration has been outweighed—at least in the eyes of politicians—by the fear of job loss, as well as illegal drugs, crime and immigration from Mexico. Canada, however, long ago started eing Mexico as a rival in its relationship with the United States, rather than a partner. Mexico, in which almost half of the population lives in poverty, much the same level as 20 years ago, has mixed feelings.
6.
Which of the following is true according to the first paragraph?
A Routine work can be offered by Mexico.
B The bet is believed to be somewhat bad on emerging rivals.
C Mexico can offer labour and manufacturing.
D Job opportunities can be protected in Mexico.
7.
According to Paragraph 2, which one is true about NAFTA?
A Politicians always pay much attention to NAFTA.
B NAFTA has reached its original anticipation in recent years.
C One aim that politicians stress NAFTA is to boost employment.
D All countries except Mexico wish to reboot the idea of North America.
8.
According to Paragraph 3, which one is NOT true?
A America exports more to Mexico than to China.
B There may be curity concerns across the borders.
C American government now values much on the trade with Mexico.
D Statesmen have greatly improved constructions across the borders.
广阔无垠的意思
9.
We can learn from the last paragraph that ______.
A Canada es Mexico and United States as **petitors
B NAFTA brings only benefits to all three North American countries
C American politicians have anticipated concerns after clor integration
D Mexicans feel optimistic about their future when they integrate with the U.S.
10.
The text mainly discuss about ______.
A rebooting of NAFTA and its concerns
B employment in North American countries
斯德哥尔摩症候群C contributions of North American countries
D relationship among North American countries
It is a fact universally accepted that Britons dislike immigration. Sure enough, when travel restrictions on Romanians and Bulgarians (impod when their countries joined the EU) were lifted on January 1st, newspapers and politicians fretted. Two MPs even took it upon themlves to meet a morning flight from Bucharest and quiz its pasngers. Yet a report published on January 2nd by Ipsos MORI, a polling firm, shows attitudes to be mor
e varied. A widening gap divides tho born before 1965 from younger folk. Although immigrants are often said to deprive younger Britons of entry-level jobs and housing, members of Generation Y (born in 1980 or later) and Generation X (born between 1966 and 1979) are ambivalent towards them. By contrast, the baby boomers (born between 1945 and 1965) and the old, who benefit most from cheap carers and cleaners, counterintuitively think immigrants a drag. Age influences opinion more strongly than social class does. This makes Britain an oddity. Ipsos MORI conducted the same study in Germany, and found the views of the young and the old to be converging. According to Robert Ford of the University of Manchester, the gap between the old and the young is larger in Britain than in America, France or Spain, too. Different life experiences explain why. When baby boomers were in their politically formative teens and early 20s, Britain was a pretty homogeneous place; before the mid-1970s it was clor to the Commonwealth than to continental Europe. That generation grew up doubtful about diversity. East European immigrants, who began arriving in large numbers in the mid-2000s, doubly offend them. Bobby Duffy of Ipsos MORI, who has conducted focus groups
with members of this generation, reports that the prospect of retirement makes people worry about their children's chances. For Generation X, mass immigration, European integration and multiculturalism are part of the furniture. They grew up in a more individualistic Britain; which, says Mr. Ford, explains their relative distaste for authority, homogeneity and flag-waving. This, like university attendance (**mon among this group than their parents), tends to make people more tolerant of different races and nationalities. Thus Generation X's experiences are clor to tho of Generation Y than to the baby boomers—a fact reflected in Ipsos MORI's findings.
