李世默ted英文演讲稿
篇一：李世默TED演讲稿(中英文)
李世默TED：
骑驴看唱本中国崛起与“元叙事”的终结探索勾股定理
Good morning. My name is Eric Li, and I was born here. But no, I wasn’t born there. This was where I was born: Shanghai, at the height of the Cultural Revolution. My grandmother tells me that she heard the sound of gunfire along with my first cries. When I was growing up, I was told a story that explained all I ever needed to know that humanity. It went like this. All human societies develop in linear progression, beginning with primitive society, then slave society, feudalism, capitalism, socialism, and finally, guess where we end up Communism! Sooner or later, all of humanity, regardless of culture, language, nationality, will arrive at this final stage of political and social development. The entire world’s peoples will be unified in this paradi on earth and live happily ever after. But before we get there, we’re engaged in a struggle between good and evil, the good of socialism against the evil of capitalism, and the good shall triumph. That,
葱花馒头of cour, was the meta-narrative distilled from the theories of Karl Marx. And the Chine bought it. We were taught that grand story day in and day out. It became part of us, and we believed in it. The story was a bestller. About on third of the entire world’s population lived under that meta narrative. Then, the world changed overnight. As for me, disillusioned by the failed religion of my youth, I went to America and became a Berkeley hippie. Now, as I was coming of age, something el happened. As if one big story wasn’t enough, I was told another one. This one was just as grand. It also claims that all human societies develop in a linear progression towards a singular end. This one went as follows. All societies, regardless of culture, be it Christian, Muslim, Confucian, must progress from traditional societies in which groups are the basic units to modern societies in which atomized individuals are the sovereign units, and all the individuals are, by definition, rational, and they all want one thing: the vote. Becau they all rational, once given the vote, they produce good government and live happily ever after. Paradi on earth, again.
Sooner or later, electoral democracy will be the only political system for all countries
恁时and all peoples, with a free market to make them all rich. But before we get there, we’re engaged in a struggle between good and evil. The good belongs to tho who are democracies and are charged with a mission of spreading it around the globe, sometimes by force, against the evil of tho who do 助学金申请流程
not hold elections. Now. This story also became a bestller. According to the Freedom Hou, the number of democracies went from 45 in 1970 to 115 in XX. In the last 20years, Western elites tirelessly trotted around the globe lling this prospectus: multiple parties fight for political power and everyone voting on them is the only path to salvation to the long-suffering developing world. Tho who buy the prospectus are destined for success. Tho who do not are doomed to fail. But this time, the Chine didn’t buy it. Fool me once… The rest is history. In just 3p years, China went from one of the poorest agricultural countries in the world to its cond-largest economy. Six hundred fifty million people were lifted out of poverty. Eighty percent of
相逢的喜悦the entire world’s poverty alleviation during that period happened in China. In other words, all the new and old democracies put together amounted to a mere fraction of what a single, one-party state did without voting. See, I grew up on this stuff: food stamps. Meat was rationed to a few hundred grams per person per month at one point. Needless to say, I ate my grandmother’s portions. So I asked mylf, what’s wrong with this picture Here I am in my hometown, my business growing leaps and bounds. Entrepreneurs are starting companies every day. Middle class is expanding in speed and scale unprecedented in human history. Yet, according to the grand story, none of this should be happening. So I went and did the only thing I could. I studied it. Yes, China is a one-party state run b
y the Chine Communist Party, the Party, and they don’t hold elections. There assumptions are made by the dominant political theories of our time. Such a system is operationally rigid, politically clod, and morally illegitimate. Well, the assumptions are wrong. The opposites are true. Adaptability, meritocracy, and legitimacy are the three defining characteristics of China’s one-party煎豆腐的家常做法
非法出版物system. Now, most political scientists will tell us that a one-party system is inherently incapable of lf-correction. It won’t last long becau it cannot adapt. Now here are the facts. In 64 years of running the largest country in the world, the range of the party’s policies
has been wider than any other country in recent memory, from radical land collectivization to the Great Leap Forward, then privatization of farmland, then the Cultural Revolution, then Deng Xiaoping’s market reform, then successor Jiang Zemin took the giant political step of opening up party membership to private businesspeople, something unimaginable during Mao’s rule. So the party lf-corrects in rather dramatic fashions. Institutionally, new rules get enacted to correct previous dysfunctions. For example, term limits. Political leaders ud to retain their positions for life, and they ud that to accumulate power and perpetuate their rules. Mao was the father of modern China, yet his prolonged rule led to disastrous mistakes. So the party instituted term limits with mandatory retirement age of 68 to 70. One
