For the development of a country, it is more important to spend money on education of very young children than to spend on universities.
Education plays an increasing fundamental role in our days. We tie the future of our country to the level of education standard and government is projecting to increa the funding for students. But there is a substantial divergence of opinion. Some say that the significance of educating our young children outweighs that of elder students and the government should elevate the investment on the former. In my opinion, spending more on universities is a great deal.
First, 董庭兰through the investment on university we can harvest an instant result on the improved employment rate. The USA is suffering the aftermath of economy crisis in 2008. Countless companies are shrinking their salary and cutting employees; highly educated graduates are anxious for hunting an ordinary job. Therefore the request of new job opportunity is increas法国申根签证ing correspondingly. To fill the unemployment rate gap, government can invest more money to enhance the education level in the universities, who teaching qualities link to th
e employment rate directly. For example, the university can make u of the money into the extension of library and purcha of more books, motivating more students to engage into library marathons. Or investing the money on the recruitment of nior professors, who can not only deliver more practical knowledge to students, but also u his/her strong personal network to recommend some excellent students to some positions.
Second, numerous scientific rearch achievements come from universities labs. Doing experiments is not so cost-efficient but brings many progressions to our lives and our society, which is cloly related to everyone. So labs need more funding. For example, enjoying a good reputation in the domain of physics, Stanford University us her linear accelerator, which is the largest in the world, to accomplish many rearches. But starting up the machines needs electricity much enough to light up a town for a whole year. Is that worthy? Certainly it is. Seemingly not environmental-friendly at first sight, the rearches in Stanford are exceedingly important; without them, the nuclear power cannot get its proper and safe u on generating electricity, which prohibits many trees from being cut down and cuts the potential carbon emissions invisibly. There is no doubt t
hat the government should pay the bill, providing solid funding for universities to explore the science.
Admittedly, scientists are more mindful of the preliminary education for young kids. According to rearch, 5-10 year-old is the golden time to cultivate children’s intelligences. Kids are unconsciously influenced by environmental elements such as the sophisticated teaching facility. But we should take it with a grain of salt. Young children are prone to be distracted in multi-media classrooms becau their brains are not mature enough to resist temptations of online games, which can be played cretly on the class. So, spending too much money on young children is merely an exerci in vain.
In sum, although educational funding on young children cannot be left on the sidelines, only the universities can live up to the great funding and make best u of it. Put more money on the latter when facing limited budgets.
预估分数：4.5
论据展开的推理不错，叙述也清晰，说服力强
积累不错，单词量等都挺大的，但叙述的时候要注意细节
急忙造句用词方面，有的地方不必那么正式。
铁蹄
Independent Task | Level：Good |
科任>称赞拼音4.5 | 27 |
| |
We need tohave different sources of news and information to know which one is the realone or who is telling the truth.
The ability of independent thinking, virtually symbolizes the [the去掉]intelligence, is treasured nowadays. Lazy modern people tend to be misled by some single-sourced ne
ws, becau the same event can be reported in different versions which may either agitate public anger or reassure their anxiety. Therefore, limited information will encumber people to dig the truth. In my point, grasping varies sources of news are the cornerstone to explore and identify the reality.
We are in the maze, the emingly shortcut to the truth may be the deliberate pitfall. To bury the truth or cover the crime, the government will control the public opinions and exert influences on people. [这里可以说take advantage of 就不用这么累赘地说两个短句了]So the sole source of news is not trustworthy. For example, in North Korea, numerous dissidents are being muzzled by the leader. Kim Jong Eun cuts the connection to the outside world and instills his extreme thought to citizens, making them believe that they are the “happiest man” [men] in the world. Under such totalitarianism, it is difficult for people to know their real life. But there are still some people who can cretly surf the Internet, knowing their life and the truth of their nation from CNN or BBC. Increasing number of citizens are escaping[加from]你会吗 North Korea currently. That exemplifies how different sources of news help people to find the truth. 朝鲜的例子举得很不错创艺生活]
Although diver sources of news may perplex people, they are the cornerstone for in depth truth exploring. [加连字符]One-sided news reports make it easy for North Korean to know the truth. On the contrary, in the countries with freedom of speech, it is grossly tough for people to identify the reality. Nonetheless, different sources of news provide different perspectives toward the same events. By comparison of the news, we can survive from the overwhelming information. For example, Reuters, Times and The Wall Street journals, they cho different point [复数] to report the Mh370 accidents. Finding the contradictions and common points in the reports, we can ensure that the plane has deviated its airline and the oil had been consumed up. But whether the plane exploded or directly sank into the a needs further information. [结合时事很好，而且也和前面一段有自然的衔接]
