人力资源管理专业外文翻译----更好地管理知识型员工
一、外文原文
原文一：
教师业务自传Knowledge Workers Need Better Management
黄疸偏高Knowledge workers could perform much better if we only knew how to manage them, says Thomas Davenport. His suggestion: Don't treat them the all same, and measure them tactfully.
They don't like to be told what to do. They enjoy more autonomy than other workers. Much of their work is invisible and hard to measure, becau it goes on inside their heads or outside the office. They are a growing part of the U.S. workforce, and their skills are hard to replace.前后鼻音绕口令
They're knowledge workers, and they are performing well below their potential becau co
mpanies still don't know how to manage them, says Thomas Davenport, professor of information technology and management at Babson College, in Wellesley, Mass., and director of rearch for Babson's executive education program.
"Knowledge workers are going to be the primary force determining which economies are successful and which aren't," he says. "They are the key source of growth in most organizations. New products and rvices, new approaches to marketing, new business models—all the come from knowledge workers. So if you want your economy to grow, your knowledge workers had better be doing a good job."
Yet after studying more than 100 companies and 600 individual knowledge workers, Davenport has come to the conclusion that the old dictum of hiring smart people and leaving them alone isn't the best way to get the most out of knowledge workers. As he writes in his latest book, "Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results from Knowledge Workers" (Harvard Business School Press, July 2005), although knowledge workers "can't be managed in the traditional n of the word, you can intervene, but you can't do it in a heavy-handed, hierarchical way."
小肚腩
东罗马帝国Executive Editor Allan Alter has followed Davenport's career from his days as a pioneering thinker on business process reengineering and knowledge management. He met with Davenport in his office at Babson College's School of Executive Education in order to learn how managers, and CIOs in particular, can improve the performance
of this critical gment of the workforce. An edited version of their discussion follows.
CIO Insight: How do you define knowledge workers?
DAVENPORT: People who primary job is to do something with knowledge: to create it, distribute it, apply it.
Most of the time they also have a high degree of education or experti. They include anywhere from a quarter to a third of the workforce, but not everyone who us knowledge. If you are digging ditches, you may have some knowledge on the job, but it's not the primary purpo of what you do.
Are companies doing a good job of managing and improving the performance of knowled
ge workers?
绿华园They're not. What most organizations do is HSPALTA: Hire smart people and leave them alone. We've spent a lot of effort recruiting knowledge workers and asssing how capable they might be before we hire them. But once they're hired we don't do a lot to improve their performance. Process improvement has mostly been for other workers: transactional workers, manufacturing workers, people in call centers. All the rious approaches to improving work have largely escaped knowledge work.
We let knowledge workers get away with saying there's no process to their work, that every day is different. We don't measure much of anything about knowledge work.舒乐安定副作用
If we don't measure knowledge work, why do you think there's room to improve knowledge worker productivity and performance?
It's a pretty well-informed hunch. People improve process all the time; they just haven't done it with knowledge-work process as much. It's an extrapolation of the same logic in other work, that process can be improved.五星红旗是谁设计的
Here is one number that indicates performance and productivity can be improved: IDC found that 1,000 knowledge workers can lo as much as $6 million a year just arching for nonexistent data, or repeating work that has already been done. Is it possible every knowledge worker is working to his or her potential? It's possible, but unlikely. We can get a lot better at improving their performance.
Why hasn't knowledge management helped more in the effort to improve knowledge-worker performance and productivity?
Knowledge management was an early attempt to intervene in knowledge work. For the most part, it wasn't particularly successful, becau we didn't look cloly at how knowledge workers did their work. We tried to be too broad in our focus.
