专四作文样题 (2016 年发布)
第一部分：原题
PART VI WRITING
[45 MIN]
Should we review traditional Chine characters鄂尔多 or continue using
simplified characters? This has been an intenly discusd question for
years. The following are the supporters' and opponents' opinions. Read
carefully the opinions from both sides and write your respon in about 200
words, in which you平津战役总指挥是谁 should first summarize briefly the opinions from both
sides and give your view on the issue.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency,
organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions
may result in a loss of marks.
Yes No
Traditional characters, which In today ’s world, efficiency date back to more than 2000 years matters most. Traditional
| ago, have a more beautiful appearance and a more reasonable | | characters, which usually have more strokes than学习教师法心得体会 simplified ones, |
| | | |
structure. As indicated by the 親 are more difficult to learn. By
| and 愛 examples, traditional characters make more n, convey traditional values and can therefore reprent traditional culture. For纳美族 two millennia, Chine historical records and classic works were written in traditional characters. To be able to read them and inherit traditional cultures, we need to bring traditional characters back. Politically, it is also necessary to restore traditional Chine characters. Currently, traditional characters are still in u in Hong Kong, Taiwan and many Chine communities around the world. Restoring them can contribute to cross-Strait exchanges and national reunifications and unite Chine people around the world. | | contrast, simplified characters are much easier to learn and u. Over the past 50 years, lots of classic texts have been turned into simplified-character versions, which means simplified characters can also promote and prerve traditional culture. Constant simplification has been a trend in the evolution of Chine characters. From the oracle bones script of 3000 years ago to traditional characters, the Chine writing system has always been slimming down for better communication. |
| | | |
第二部分：参考答案（ 1）
写作指南
考生在下笔之前应先审题，明确写作要求：针对 “我们究竟是该恢复中文繁
体字还是继续使用简体汉字 ”这一热议话题，首先总结正反方的意见，然后给出
个人观点。文章结构可安排如下：
第一段：简要概括赞同和反对恢复繁体字方和提倡使用简体字方的观点，
第二段： 表明自己的观点：复兴繁体字是不明智的。直击正方观点漏洞，
分三点铺陈论证。繁体字在沟通交流上效率不及简体字；繁体字可读性和可接
受性不强；保存传统文化和价值并不是只有恢复繁体字这一种方式。
第三段：重申观点 —— 恢复中文繁体字不是明智之举。
The necessity to revive traditional Chine characters has aroud an
increasingly heated discussion for decades. Some in favor of it hold that
traditional Chine characters, with a more vivid and descriptive appearance,
is a perfect embodiment of traditional culture and a bond for cross-Straits
exchanges and national reunification ( 复兴 ). Some are against it for its
complexity to write and inefficiency to communicate, which can be otherwi
avoided by simplified characters. Besides, simplified characters can also
rve the purpo of promoting traditional幼儿学唐诗 culture and this simplified writing
system is an irreversible ( 不可逆的 ) trend.
From my perspective 搏的组词, it's not wi to deliberately / intentionally initiate a
renaissance of traditional Chine characters for following reasons:
First幼儿活动设计教案 and foremost , words and language are tools created for better
communication. In this 知名猎头公司n, efficiency is of utmost importance if simplified
Chine characters can perform the same function of the traditional ones.
Secondly , readability ( 可读性) and acceptability are potential barriers /
hindrance to the restoration ( 恢复) of traditional characters. Most of mainland
Chine learn simplified characters from their infancy / childhood. So it will be
hard for them to accept a totally unfamiliar word system.
Last, traditional Chine characters do help cultural inheritance ( 传承) ,
but it doesn't mean reviving it is the sole ( 唯一的) way to prerve traditional
