九年义务教育延长十二年观点英语作文
The high school entrance examination itlf is a wrong topic. Everyone can e the proposal of "12-year compulsory education" every year. Many reprentatives feel that the nior high school entrance examination is not required at all. Why can't nior high school also provide compulsory education? Now our country is rich, and the average quality of students and basic education are getting better and better. Why not let your kids go to high school?
Becau education and exams are two different things. I've made a subtitle for this topic before that reads:
"You need your kids to go to high school, but society doesn't."
What parents e is that their children are their only ones. They all hope that their children can get better educational resources and have a higher social status in the future. But what society needs is "division of labor". The state collects taxes from everyon
e and establishes education, not to meet the needs of parents, but to meet the needs of social employment.
From this perspective, many of the public's doubts about education policy can be answered. Just like our college entrance examination reform, many parents are scolding, in the past, arts and sciences were divided into subjects, which can be evaluated and run very well. Now that you have come up with so many "innovations" in the college entrance examination, it is difficult for teachers to evaluate how many points our children "should" be able to take.
But this is the purpo of reform. From your point of view, you think that the college that the child graduated from is his origin, and knowing his exact positioning will make him high if he fails in the exam. But from the perspective of the country, your child will enter the labor market one year later, and if he retires at the age of 65 or 70, he will pay one less year of social curity. One child is like this, how about 100,000 people a year, and one million people are rehabilitated?
Reform the college entrance examination, increa the chance, and the probability of high relap will naturally decrea. As long as your child is not in high school, then the reform of the college entrance examination is a success.
In the same way, instead of 12-year compulsory education, a group of children will be diverted from the middle school entrance examination, and they will enter vocational education and enter the labor market three years earlier. Not only does the country save money, but they can also pay three more years of social curity. You can understand this account.
The people's idle time to scold the Ministry of Education, and the success of the Ministry of Education's educational reform policy, are two sides of the same thing. Everyone's interests are different, and naturally they will have completely different ideas and practices. Like education reform, it is simply not something that can be changed by individual will. Social needs are like that, what can the Ministry of Education do?
If parents with insufficient financial ability want their children to receive higher education, t
here is only one way to encourage their children to "do better than others"
