Title:
The rearcher of college English teacher’s performance appraisal
Topic:
Performance -----performance appraisal-----performance appraisal of college English teacher
Rearch questions:
1. What kind of aspects should be included in college English teacher performance?
2. What are the functions, Principles and significance of college English teacher performance evaluation?
3. what are the particularities of college English teacher performance?
4. What kind of teacher can be called high-qualified college English teacher? What are their characteristics?
5. What is the status quo of college English teacher performance evaluation?
6. How to establish a reasonable college English teacher performance evaluation system? What should be included in this system? What are the guidelines and stages of the reasonable evaluation system?
7. What is the appropriate evaluating method to college English teacher Performance?
摘要
本文的研究主要包括三大部分:第一部分,大学英语教师绩效评估现状研究,在这一部分里主要研究了大学英语教师绩效的概念界定,大学英语教师绩效的特殊性,高绩效大学英语教师的特征,同时采用问卷调查与访谈的方法对当前大学英语教师绩效评估的现状进行了研究。第二部分,大学英语教师绩效评估指标体系研究,在这一部分中主要研究了大学英语教师绩效评估指标体系建立的理论基础、基点、原则和功能,指标体系的具体结构和权重。第三部分,大学英语教师绩效评估的实施方法研究,包括应用数据包络分析方法和标杆管理方法对教师绩效进行排名,对绩效不佳的教师提出具体改进措施,利用增加约束的办法来平衡大学英语教师
的教学、科研和服务工作。为了进行深入研究,本论文进行了充分的准备与论证,重点针对大学英语教师绩效评估所涉及的7个方面,展开了较为全面的理论思辨和实证研究。
abstract
This disrtation includes three Parts. Part1 is rearch status. In this Part, the definition and the Particularities of college English teacher Performance are made clear , it Is a kind of conceptual refinement; The characteristics of high performance college English teacher is analyzed: the status quo of college English teacher performance Evaluation is studied by the way of questionnaires and interview. Part2 is the study of Index system of college English teacher Performance evaluation . in this Part, the Theoretical basis, guidelines, Principles and function of the index system are illustrated; The concrete structure and weight scales of the asssment index system are constructed. Part3 is actualization (or implementation method) study of college English teacher Performance evaluation. It includes :ranking 15 teachers using data envelopment analysis Method and bench-making method: bringing forward betterment measures to non-valid (or poor perfor
mance) teachers: balancing teaching, scientific rearch and rvice work Of college English teacher by adding constraints . In order to make an in-depth study or an intensive study, an adequate preparation And a substantial argument are made. Especially to the 7 aspects involved in college English teacher Performance evaluation, a comprehensive theoretical speculativeness and Empirical rearch are developed.
Citation:
教师绩效评估(teacher performance evaluation)是指按照一定的教育方针和政策,确立教师的工作目标和行为指标,对教师所实施的各种教育教学活动的有效性以及完成工作的状态水平进行科学的价值判断的过程,以了解教师工作的质量,通常是在工作中通过课堂观察、由领导、同事和学生等做出评定(蔡永红,2001)。教师评估,有人也称为“教师评价”、“教师评估”、“教师考核”。教师评估通过对教师素质及其在教育教学工作中的行为表现状况的测量,评判教师的素质水平和教育教学效果,并为进一步提高教师的素质水平和提高其教育教学效果提供切实可行的建议。何宪在《人才评价师》给出教师评估的概念是:教师评价是评价主体采用科学的方法,收集被评价者在主要活动领域中的表征信息,针对评价目标体系做出量值
或价值的判断过程,或者直接从所收集的表征信息引发与推断某些素质特性的过程“。本文认为,教师评估主要指根据学校的发展目标和教师的工作任务制定出的相应的评估指标体系,运用科学的方法(定性和定量)收集信息,对教师日常工作的有效性进行价值判断的过程,达到促进学科发展,为人事决策提供依据,促使教师成长和发展的目的。具体来说,大学教师评估应是在对大学教师的综合素质、教学、科研和服务等进行客观描述的基础上,对其做出价值判断的活动。一个完整的教师评估体系,包括评估的目的、评估运用的规则标准、评估的目标群体、评估所要涵盖的范围、评估的步骤和方法、评估的手段、评估所要涉及的人员以及评估所提供的反馈信息等(陈玉馄,1998)。
Reference:
参考文献
Alan Bryman, Dunean Cramer. Quantitative Data Analysis with Minitab A guide for Social Scientist Collection and Analysis. Lond and New York: International Thomson Publishing ComPany.1996.
Ali A l, et al. Strict vs. weak ordinal relations for multipliers in DEA[J].management Scienee,1991,37,(6):733-738.
Athanasso Poulos A D, Gounaris C, Sissouras A. A Descriptive Asssment of the Produetion and Cost Efficiency of General HosPitals in Greece[J].Health Care management science,1999,2(2):97-106.
Avkiran N K. Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian Universities Through data envelopment analysis[J].Socio-economic Planning Scienees,2001,35(1):57-50
Bandura, A.Self-efficacy:The exerci of control. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1997
Brouwers, A. & Tomie, W.,Alongitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived lf-efficacy in classroom management[J」.Teaching and Teacher Edueation,2000,16(3),239-253·
Cameron Kim, Smart John. Maintaining Effectiveness Amid Downsizing and Decline in
Institution of Higher Edueation[J].Rearch in Higher Edueation,1998,39(l):65-86.
Dale L L. A blueprint for a teacher development Program[A].Second Language Teacher education[C〕.北京:外语教学与研究出版社,人民教育出版社,2000.
Freeman D. Teacher training, development, and decision making model: A model of the teaching and related strategies for language teacher education[J]·TESOL Quarterly,1989,(23):27-45.
Xiao-BaiLi, Gray R, Reeves. A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis[J].European journal of operational Rearch,1999,115:507-517.
Zilla S, et al. Ranking units via AHP in the DEA context[C].The15th Triennial
International Conference of IROFS'99,Beijing,1999,Aug.:15-20.
班杜拉.自我效能:控制的实施[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2003.
包乌云.美国教师评价制度的改革与发展[J].教育探索.2004,45-47
布鲁纳,教育论著选[M],人民教育出版社,1989
布卢姆B·S、邱渊译,教育评价[M].华东师范大学出版社,1987.
