Paper Books Will Not Be Obsolete
The appearance of e-books has already proved a success and may well start a trend. Paper books are not obsolete, however, nor will they be. Although e-books have some advantages, e-books are not likely to replace paper books.
The habit of reading paper books is difficult to change. According to an optimistic report relead in April 2012 from the American Pew Center, among the readers who have a habit of doing some bedtime reading, nearly half of them prefer reading paper books (Wang). Surprisingly, e-book readers also buy a considerable number of paper books. According to the survey, 88 percent of e-book readers admit that they still buy paper books for many reasons (Wang). People’s long-standing reading habit for over thousands of years cannot be changed overnight despite the announcements made by manufacturers that宫寒吃什么好
e-books have many advantages against traditional paper books (Li). The value of reading lies in the words we e and also in the relation with readers’ spirit and life experience. Reading is something that we do with our bodies (Egan). People can be distinguished by the way they
hold a book, the speed they ruffle the pages and the notes they take down on the books. People gain mild satisfaction through the thickness of paper and the smell of ink. From the perspective of person孕妇能不能吃枸杞
, habit and gesture, the touch of paper books can be regarded as the most elementary n (Egan). Touching is how people started to explore the world, to feel it, to measure it, and make good u of it. The irreplaceable feeling of touch adds nsory information to the books, enriches the meaning of the words and provides multidimensional understanding (Egan).
Compared with e-books, paper books em less portable and convenient. However, the defects do not outweigh the merits. Firstly, paper book can also be artwork. Each paper book has its own cover, which is elaborately designed and sometimes rved as an implication of the theme of the book attractively. For example, the unique mitransparent cover of the recent English versio太原之战
n of 1Q84 (written by Haruki Murakami), which was designed by Chip Kid, successfully reveals the virtual and the real worlds in the novel’s plot (Lian). Secondly, each paper book is collectible and unique to some extent. For the publication of paper books is limited, paper books posss the quality of scarcity. For rea
ders who sincerely love a particular book, a physical copy of the book can not be thoroughly replaced by an electronic facsimile (Catone). Above all, the paper book itlf is a link to history. When people are in the contemplation of the single volume, or mass of volumes, people form a picture of time past as a growing deposit of diment; people capture a n of its depth and dimensionality (Birkerts 145). However, when people are facing an e-book, they can no longer feel this n of chronology becau all information is equally accessible in a weightless order on their electronic devices (Birkerts, 146). They can easily retrieve any ction of history without knowing the previous chapters, which is not favorable to their comprehension of history.
Actually, e-books are not suitable for everyone. Not everyone has an e-book reader in daily life and not everyone likes to read books off on an electronic device. Many niors have difficulties in keeping abreast of the development of information technology becau they tend to react slowly to new things. They are loyal to traditional paper books. Young children at school should continue to read the printed words on paper books for protecting their eyesight. It is said that people react differently to the messages on electro
nic screens and paper. From a psychological perspective, people tend to get tired less frequently and accept the content more easily when they read a physical paper book (Wang).
It ems that most people attain better reading experiences and lf-satisfaction from paper books than from e-books. Since both paper books and e-books have their merits and disadvantages, paper books will not be replaced by e-books completely. There is reason to hope that they can have a bright future together. “Paper books do not have to disappear for e-books to flourish and e-books don’t have to be the only choice” (Catone).
Works Cited
Birkerts, Seven. The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic
Age.USA: Faber and Faber, Inc, 1994.
Catone, Josh. “Why printed books will never die?” 16 January 2013. 3
November 2013 < /2013/01/16/e-books-vs-print>
Egan, Timothy. “The Reading Renaissance”, English Salon. 28 Oct.
2013<d./Periodical_yysl-sz201304002.aspx>.
Lian Xiaochuan. “The Outlet of Traditional Books in the Swirl of E-books”,
China Publisher. January 2012: 58-59.
Li Tong, Chen Liping. “Electronic Paper Book: Strengths, Problems,
Opportunities”, 2010 International Conference on Future Information Technology and Management Engineering, October, 2010: 259-262.儿童简单画画图片
Wang Zhengsheng. “E-book or P-book”, World Culture, August 2012: 6-9.
