Resolving Conflicts and Possible Outcomes [1] There are many ways through which people can resolve conflicts between warring factions. The warring factions can be as few as two individuals, or they might be large people groups like countries. However, the ways of resolving conflicts do not all work in any one given situation? A person or groups of people ought to decide upon which the best way of resolving a given conflict is. A model of dual concern might be assumed where an individual tries to strike a balance between the concern he has for other people and the concern he has for himlf. On the one hand he may choo to be asrtive and have things done his way. On the other hand, he may choo to be empathetic, and do things according to the way the other person feels things ought to be done. [2] When engaged in a conflicting situation, some people might decide to resolve the conflict by staying aloof of the problem. To the people staying aloof is the best way of letting things get resolved. They prefer no active participation in eing to it that the situation is resolved. They do not care much about what other people feel in the circumstances. They do not think much about their personal feelings either. High conflict situations are not best resolved with this kind of approach, however, becau things can easily run out of control. [3] An example of such a situation is when a group of employees go on strike and the management sits back to e what might happen, without taking any active role in what is going on. The strike might escalate into such bad situations as burning of company asts by the disgruntled employees or even roughing up of the employers. A bad situation grows wor in that ca, becau the employees feel that the aloofness of the management does not address their concerns. The management, however, feels that the asrtiveness of the employees ought to have been toned down. If connsus could be reached between the two parties it would be at the point where the management has taken an active role in addressing the employees’ grievances. The employees, on the other hand, ought not to be greatly aggrieved, eing that at least their cries are being heard by a management that cares for them. It is rather unfortunate that a number of people who fall into this trap are the so called faithful. They let things be, and say to themlves and to others that things shall be sorted out by divine intervention. However, things ought to be done differently, becau not everyone has the same beliefs or religious leanings. Many people re different deities and some believe in a deity that asks them to help themlves before deity comes to their aid. Therefore, instead of their faith being a source of respite, it fuels the flames of conflict for some people. [4] Another way of resolving conflict is by adorning a compromising attitude. Such an attitude says to onelf and to others that it is good to be fair to both sides of the conflict. Such people are ready to listen to the arguments on both sides and to yield a bit to the demands of the other side. They also expect the other side of the conflict to yield to some of their demands, hence being fair. In the ca study above, for example, the employees would be expected to yield to some of the demands of management while the management also gives in to some of the demands of its employees. Ideally, not all demands from each side shall be met, but a balance can be struck wherein some of the wants from each side shall be addresd. Like in the previous ca, the more asrtive of the two groups will be expected to yield a bit, by being conciliatory. This will be expected of the employees who hold the management in ransom by their actions. Being fair would not e the employees flare up into a fracas situation of burning and looting. Being fair would also e the management taking an active role in the resolution of the conflict rather than sitting back and watching as situation change from bad to wor. [5] Conflict does not have to be a bad thing or a nasty experience. Where there are two or more people interacting with different interests at heart, disagreements are inevitable. However, such disagreements might be a source for better understanding of each other and even greater cohesion. In the workplace scenario above, conflict might have arin out of one employee’s obssion with letting the management know about everything that goes on while they are not being watched. The conflict of interests comes in with the other employees being oppod to clo supervision. It is further aggravated by the fact that one of their peers would like to make a good name for onelf by making the rest of them look bad in the prence of their superiors. [6] Solving such a conflict might require one to have high levels of asrtiveness as well as empathy. With the traits he can easily cooperate with his contenders to reach an amicable solution to their conflict. Such an individual is not only interested in his own welfare but has a heightened interest in the welfare of the people he contends with, as well. He shall cooperate with the other people to find a solution with which they shall all be agreeable. His cooperation might tend to favor the side of the fellow employees, or it might be in favor of the management. However, what would a person caught in the middle of such a conflict do? Through discussion with both parties, people get to be aware of the points of views that their contenders have. In effect, they do not undermine the goals of each other. 刘琼芳[7] There are three possible outcomes to any conflict resolution endeavor. Each of the outcomes depends on how the conflict resolution exerci is carried out. In the first place, a conflict resolution exerci might work in favor of both sides concerned. Since both parties win in the end, this is called a win-win situation. The first type of conflict resolution that was mentioned in this dialogue would never amount to a win-win situation. Not both parties win in the end. This is becau one of the parties stays aloof from the goings on of the resolution process. [8] Since its stand is neither here nor there, it becomes rather difficult to tell whether things are going the way they should for this group of people. Whether they win or lo is not the issue for this group, but rather, they only want tranquility in the end. They want peace but they are not ready to work or to fight for it. Maybe, therefore, one might be right in assuming that when peace prevails in the end, then that is a win situation for the people who do not want to stand up for what they believe in. It may be rightly opined that the people are cowards who do not have enough spine with which to face up to other people, even though they might be transgresd against. 青铜葵花作者 [9] A win-win result of conflict resolution is the best result that one can achieve. It results in greater cohesion among group members than before the conflict caud a rift between them. They also get to learn more about each other’s way of thinking and what things can cau them to be drawn apart. In future, they will not fear conflicting situations, but they would rather strive to keep away from tho things that divide them. They will strive for tho things that cau them to be drawn clor together as a single unit. [10] The other result of a conflict resolution is where one side wins and the other los. In such a ca, no workable connsus has been reached. One side of the conflict is way too aggressive while the other is too empathetic. The aggressive side is bound to have its way over the empathetic side. Thus, the aggressive side wins while the empathetic side los. This example of a scenario is called a win-lo situation becau one side wins while the other side los. It would be likened to an employer-employee conflict situation in which the employee has a field day over the employer, with all the employee’s demands being met. The employer’s demands, on the other hand are not heeded to. Otherwi, the employer might be too high handed towards the employee. Following such a situation, the employer ends up sacking the employee for reasons such as insubordination. | 化解冲突可能带来的结果 天窗保养交战双方可以通过各种方法解决矛盾。有矛盾的双方小至个人，大至群体比如国家。但是，有的时候不是所有的解决方法都有用。一个人或是群体应该选取最有效的办法解决矛盾。双重关注模型是指一个人需要关注两个方面即他人和自己，并在两者中取得一定平衡。他有可能选择坚持自己的主张；也有可能出于同理心，选择照别人的话去做。 卷入一场矛盾风波，有人选择回避问题。他们认为先将问题放一放是最好的解决方式，也倾向于以不主动参与的方式确保问题能够得到解决。他们很少在乎别人的感受，对自己个人的感受也少有考虑。这种办法并不适用于矛盾冲突较大的情形，因为这样局势容易失控。 女儿出嫁父亲简短致词 |
| 幼儿园大班教养笔记 |
本文发布于:2023-08-01 20:40:19，感谢您对本站的认可！
本文链接：https://www.wtabcd.cn/fanwen/fan/82/1126066.html
版权声明：本站内容均来自互联网，仅供演示用，请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系，我们将在24小时内删除。
| 留言与评论（共有 0 条评论） |
