大学英语A3
一、阅读理解
It's a modern problem: you're too busy to be disturbed by many phone calls so you turn your cell phone off. But if you don't remember to turn it back on when you're less busy, you could miss some important calls. If only the phone knew when it was wi to interrupt you, you wouldn't have to turn it off at all. Instead, it could let calls through when you are not too busy.
A bunch of behavior nsors and a clever piece of software could do just that, by analyzing your behavior to determine if it's a good time to interrupt you. If built into a phone, the system may decide you're too busy and ask the caller to leave a message or ring back later.
James Fogarty and Scott Hudson at carnegie Mellon University in Pennsylvania bad their system on tiny microphones, cameras and touch nsors that reveal body language and ac
tivity. First they had to study different behaviors to find out which ones strongly predict whether your mind is interrupted.
The potential "busyness" signals they focud on included whether the office doors were left open or clod, the time of day, if other people were with the person in question, how clo they were to each other, and whether or not the computer was in u.
The nsors monitored the and many other factors while four subjects were at work. At random intervals，the subjects rated how interruptible they were on a scale ranging from "highly interruptible" to "highly not interruptible". Their ratings were then correlated with the various behaviors. "It is a shotgun approach：we ud all the indicators we could think of and then let statistics find out which were important, " says Hudson.
The model showed that using the keyboard, and talking on a landline or to someone el in the office correlated most strongly with how interruptible the subjects judged themlves to be.
山山
Interestingly, the computer was actually better than people at predicting when someone was too busy to be interrupted. The computer got it right 82 per cent of the time, humans 77 per cent. Fogarty speculates that this might be becau people doing the interrupting are inevitably biad towards delivering their message, whereas computers don't care.
The first application for Hudson and Fogarty's system is likely to be in an instant messaging system, followed by office phones and cell phones. "There is no technological roadblock to it ud in a couple of years," says Hudson.
(1)、A big problem facing people today is that ______.
A：they must tolerate phone disturbances or miss important calls
B：they must turn off their phones to keep their homes quiet
C：they have to switch from a desktop phone to a cell phone
D：they are too busy to make phone calls or write e-mails
答案： A
(2)、The behavior nsor and software system built in a phone ______.
A：could help store important messages
B：could nd messages immediately
C：二战战场could tell when it's right to interrupt you
D：中小学必读书目could refu important phone calls
答案： C
(3)、Scientists at Carnegie Mellon University tried to find out ______.
A：why office doors were often 1eft open一百英语
B：when it was a good time to turn off the computer
C：what questions office workers were bothered with
D：which behaviors could tell whether a person was busy
答案： D宝宝烫伤
(4)、During the experiment, the subjects were asked ______.
A：to control the nsors and the camera
B蟹肉怎么做好吃：to rate the degrees to which they could be interrupted
C：to compare their behaviors with one another's
D：to analyze all the indicators of interruption
符组词答案： B
(5)、The computer performed better than people in the study becau ______.
A：the computer worked harder
B：the computer was not busy新年快乐简笔画
C：people tended to be biad
D：people were not good at statistics
答案： C
In 1985, the Coca-cola company made the decision to change the formula of its leading soft drink. The change was bad on the findings of many market studies. The studies had shown that the general respon to the new product was good. However, the change of the traditional Coca-cola by New Coke was rejected by the majority of drinkers. In fact, the company had to step back and restart production of the old formula of Coca-cola.
The most important reason why New Coke was rejected was the emotional relationship that existed between drinkers and the old soft drink formula. Drinking Coca-cola had become a tradition for many people over its 99 years of existence. The change made by the company was not only in Coke's formula but also in the traditional values an
d memories that it reprented to the drinkers. "We had taken away more than the product Coca-cola. We had taken away a little part of them and their past." The drinkers rejected this "improvement", becau "they believed that Coke stood for so they felt betrayed when the product changed completely overnight".
