Kirky v. Kirky
Supreme Court of Alabama, 1845.
8 Ala. 131.
酉时出生Facts: The defendant (Isaac Kirky – the brother in law) promid the plaintiff (Antillico Kirky – the sister in law) a place to live. The plaintiff abandoned her former home and moved. After two years, the defendant booted her out. The trial court awarded the plaintiff $200.
快乐的泼水节Issue: Was the defendant’s promi legally enforceable?
1. Trial Court:
Plaintiff: Antillico Kirky – the sister in law达古冰川在哪里
Defendant: Isaac Kirky – the brother in law
Result: Trial was by jury and Verdict for plaintiff for $200.
仡佬2. Appellate Court:
Appellant: Issack Kirky – the brother in law
Appellee: Antillico Kirky – the sister in law
Result: Sustained trial court
3. Supreme Court:
Petitioner (defendant in error): Isaac Kirky – the brother in law
Respondent (plaintiff in error): Antillico Kirky – the sister in law
表格居中Rule relied upon by the majority: A purely gratuitous promi shall not be enforced.
Decision by the majority: The judgment of the trial court was reverd and the plaintiff got nothing.
原书错误更正如下：
1、 当事人
（1） 一审原告（plaintiff）、被上诉人（plaintiff in error）：Mrs. Antillico Kirky（一审胜诉、上诉胜诉、终审败诉）。
招工简章范本
（2） 肠瘘一审被告（defendant）、上诉人（defendant in error）：Mr. Kirky（一审败诉、上诉败诉、终审胜诉）。
何主宇于纽约家中
