H且的用法和意义ow Do We Deal with the Drug Problem?家常牛肉面
1.Drugs
It is possible to stop most drug addiction in the United States within a very short time. Simply make all drugs available and ll them at cost. Label each drug with a preci description of what effect the drug will have on the taker. This will require heroic honesty. Don’t say that marijuana is addictive and dangerous when it is neither----unlike “speed,” which kills most unpleasantly, or heroin, which is addictive and difficult to kick.
For the record, I have tried almost every drug and liked none, disproving the popular theory that a whiff of opium will enslave the mind. Nevertheless many drugs are bad and they should be told why in a nsible way.
Along with exhortation and warning, it might be good for our citizens to recall that the United States was the creation of men who believed that each man has the right to do what he wants with his own life as long as he does not interfere with his neighbor’s pursuit of happiness.
Now one can hear the warning rumble begin: If everyone is allowed to take drugs everyone will and we shall end up a race of Zombies. Alarming thought. Yet, it ems most unlikely that any reasonably sane person will become a drug addict if he knows in advance what addiction is going to be like.
Is everyone reasonably sane? No. some people will always become drug addicts just as some people will always become alcoholics, and it is just too band. Every man, however, has the power (and should have the legal right ) to kill himlf if he choos. But since most men don’t, they won’t be mainliners either. Nevertheless, forbidding people things they like or think they might enjoy only makes them want tho things all the more. This psychological insight is, for some mysterious reason, always denied our governors.
It is a lucky thing for the American moralist that we have no public memory of anything that happened last Tuesday. No one in Washington today recalls what happened during the years alcohol was forbidden to the people by a Congress that thought it had a divine mission to stamp out Demon Rum---launching, in the process, the greatest crime wave in
the country’s history, causing thousands of deaths from bad alcohol, and creating a general ( and persisting ) contempt among the citizenry for laws of the United States.
The same thing is happening today. But the government has learned nothing from past attempts at prohibition.
Last year when the supply of marijuana was slightly reduced by the Feds, the pushers got the kids hooked on heroin and deaths incread dramatically. Who fault? I think the Government of the United States was responsible for tho deaths. The bureaucratic machine has a vested interest in playing cops and robbers. Both the Bureau of Narcotics and the Mafia want strong laws against the sale and u of drugs becau if drugs are sold at cost there would be no money in it for anyone.泰国东方饭店
驻村故事
If there was no money in it for the Mafia, there would be no friendly playground pushers. And addicts would not commit crimes to pay for the next fix. Finally, if there was no money in it, the Bureau of Narcotics would wither away, something they are not about to do without a struggle.
Will anything nsible be done? Of cour not. The American people are as devoted to the idea of sin and its punishment as they are to making money----and fighting drugs is nearly as big a business as pushing them. Therefore the situation will only grow wor.
2. T天上无二he Trouble with Legalizing Drugs
If you can’t win the game, change the rules. Such is the deliciously convenient reasoning that the drug problem can be resolved by legalizing it. Unfortunately, legalization sounds too good to be true and probably is.
It sounds good becau it’s simple. It would immediately remove the immen profits drugs now pump into the criminal underworld, it would reduce the forbidden-fruit attraction drugs have for young people and it would take away the criminal stigmas that prevents many addicts from eking help. You even could tax the sale of now-illegal drugs and u the money to build more treatment centers, which are desperately needed.
Deep thinkers have long advocated lifting the prohibition on drugs. Last year the debate
was stirred anew when Baltimore Mayor Kurt Schmoke called for a rious national debate on the subject.
大金山寺Schmoke’s advocacy was bad on his experience as a drug procutor. He felt as though he was bailing out the ocean with a teaspoon. Prohibition of drugs is working no better than prohibition of liquor worked earlier this century, he told Congress. It increas crime without eliminating addiction. So let’s change the rules.
拉肚子可以喝什么He was not alone in his ntiments. “Prohibition is an attempted cure that makes matters wor—for both the addict and the rest of us ,” wrote Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman in 1972, after President Nixon declared a “war” on drugs.
The simplicity of this prescription has proved irresistible to many. Unfortunately, the simple beauty of such logic has an ugly gaping hole. There is considerable evidence to suggest that with legalization drug u and its social costs would increa. Sharply.
