Supplier Quality System Asssment Checklists
Section 1: Quality Management System
环境噪声污染1. Quality Function, ISO standard & Responsibilities
2. Internal Audits Quality System and other Compliance
3.Training for all Level of Organization
身不由己的近义词
Section 2: Resource Management and Capacity
Planning
4. New Product Introduction and Qualification Process
5. Capacity Planning巡视报告
6. Change Management Process, Product and Material
7. Process Capability / Process Characterization
8. Product & Process Quality Metric Review
9. Customer and Field Performance Quality Data
10. Quality Data and Communication
Section 3: Production Process
11.Calibration System and Control
12. Measurement System Analysis (Gauge R and R)
13. Control & Disposition of Non-conforming Material
14. Receiving Material Quality System and Procedure
15. Work Instructions for Manufacturing Process
16. Final Inspection and Acceptance Procedure
17. Packaging, Storage, Shipping, Material Handling
and Bar Code Requirements
18. Houkeeping, POPI and Preventive Maintenance
19. Out of Control Actions for an Internal Defect for
Mfg/Asmbly/Service Site
Section 4: Sub-Tier Quality Control and Quality
Improvements
20. Sub-Tier Supplier Selection and Management
21. Sub-Tier Supplier Corrective and Preventative
Action
22. Process Flow, FMEA, Control Plan and Statistical
Tool
23. Statistical Methods / SPC on Box X Dimensions
24. Problem Solving Techniques
25. Continuous Improvement and Mistake Proofing
U the ED12695 Quality System Asssment Scoring Form to document the results of the audit and any required actions.
Rating:
SCORE 1: Unacceptable - This element is not included in the organization’s quality management system.
SCORE 2: Unacceptable - Both planning and execution for this element require substantial improvement.
SCORE 3: Marginally Acceptable - This element is included in the supplier’s quality management system and planning is adequate. However, execution requires improvement.
SCORE 4: Acceptable - This element is included in the supplier’s quality management system and is generally well-executed.
SCORE 5: Excellent - This element is included in the supplier’s Quality Process. Planning and execution are extremely thorough.
SECTION 1: QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, Responsibility and Internal audit.
1. Quality Function, ISO Standard & Responsibilities
Is there a Quality function or organization which provides customer advocate guidance to the total organization, and i s this position fully supported by management? Is the Organization’s quality management system properly documented, maintained and has measurement metric? SCORE 1:
∙Organization has not achieved any ISO quality certification.
∙Organization does not have any quality manual.
SCORE 2:
∙Organization has obtained ISO9000 level certification and certification has not
expired.
∙Supplier has Quality manual and policy statement well documented and signed by top management.
SCORE 3:
∙Organization has obtained ISO9001 and ISO 14000 certification and other
nationally recognized quality certifications.
∙Supplier is regularly reviewing the regulatory agency requirement and keeping up compliance such OSHA, Rohs, EPA, Product Safety, ESD, and Contamination
control etc…
∙The role of the Quality function is clearly defined. Quality manual is periodically reviewed by nior management and updated as necessary
SCORE 4:
∙In addition to ISO 9000, the organization has a plan to pursue a higher level
quality certification or award (such as TL 9000, TS16949, Malcolm Bald ridge
National Quality Award, etc.).
∙Quality function clearly rves in the customer advocacy role.
∙Management is supporting a Six Sigma or Zero defect and cycle time
improvement program.
∙Quality system compliance annual audit is performed by external registrar and has very few findings.
SCORE 5:
∙The Quality function takes a leadership role in promoting the Six Sigma process, The Green Belt, Black Belt, lean enter prize or similar certification program is encouraged by
management.
∙Senior Management regularly reviews effectiveness of the clod loop corrective action of the external audit findings.
∙The role of the Quality function is well recognized and supported by all levels of management (Quality metric is part of the business review).
∙The Organization works directly with Customers not only in resolving issues, but also in understanding Customers’ business/needs to anticipate their requirements.
Comments / Objective Evidence:
Score:
2. Internal Quality system and other compliance Audits
有关立志的名言Does an internal asssment program exist as part of the quality system review process and does Management regularly report on the results?
SCORE 1:
∙No evidence of a quality management system internal asssment program exists.
SCORE 2:
∙ A documented quality management system internal asssment procedure exists and a few areas of the business such as manufacturing and inventory storage area are being assd.
∙Some corrective action has taken place bad on the results of the asssments.
∙The individual areas for an internal audit are being scheduled from a master schedule. SCORE 3:
∙Management has established a documented procedure and audit check list for conducting quality management system internal audits for all major areas of the business.
∙Management is providing resources to conduct an internal audit and corrective action to assure that all business areas are audited per specified interval in the procedure.
回族有哪些节日
∙Asssors are sufficiently trained and independent of the area assd.
∙Metric is ud to monitor on time audit, clo rates for corrective action items, reductions in # of corrective actions from year to year by various area of business and repeat rate of non
conformance.
SCORE 4:
∙The asssment schedule and frequency is sufficient to enable management to determine if
a business unit is in control.
∙Asssment results are part of a clod-loop corrective action process.
∙Management is actively reviewing results of internal asssments and using the data to initiate continuous programs.
∙Metrics utilized to track the internal audit program are showing positive measurable results.
∙Asssor certification validation period and retraining plan is kept updated.
SCORE 5:
∙There is evidence that all corrective actions are clod or are being actively worked on
∙The quality management system internal audit program is deployed in all major areas of the business and has become a routine part of the business unit review process.
∙All Corrective actions have been well documented using 8D or similar tools and have verified that ro
ot cau and solution has been implemented and supported with data. Management
has a method or metrics in place to ensure that corrective actions are effective.
∙Records and schedules pertaining to the quality management system internal asssment program are quality records and are collected, retained, and maintained per the quality record procedure
Comments / Objective Evidence:
Score:
3. Training for all levels of organization
Is Management’s support of ongoing tr aining (including problem solving, statistical
technique, and quality training) sufficient and is it documented by an organizational
training plan? Do employees have training plans to fill knowledge gaps in areas
applicable to their job function?
SCORE 1:
∙No written training plan exists.
∙Some training is performed as time and budget allows and training tends to be limited primarily to manufacturing related skills.
SCORE 2:
∙There is a documented training plan for direct labor employees.
∙Training plan includes new hires, promotions, transfers and also covers UL, OSHA, Safety and other regulatory compliances that the business demands.
SCORE 3:
∙Annual training plans for the entire organization are required by management. The training plan is fully documented and includes all new hires, transfers and managers.
∙Training plans generally tie to business and quality objectives.
∙The quality and quality related staff training curriculum includes process improvement topics, for example: Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA), Control Plan, 8D and SPC.
∙ A training program with a full curriculum and complete training records is implemented across all areas of the organization.
SCORE 4:
∙There is a well designed training roadmap/program with strong ties to the organizat ion’s business plan.
∙Employees have comprehensive training plans that account for individual needs and development.
∙Metrics have been established to evaluate training effectiveness in support of strategic plans.
Progress to plan is reviewed regularly by management.
六级模板∙Key employees of the quality group and other related areas have received process improvement training that includes GR&R, Process flow, control plan, SPC, 8D problem
solving or equivalent.小产是什么意思
SCORE 5:
五年级上语文∙Training at all levels is driven by strategic objectives, customer requirements and expectations, and individual development needs.
∙Training effectiveness measures clearly demonstrate a positive impact of training in accomplishing business and customer satisfaction objectives.
∙The training plan is updated as new training needs are identified. The program for quality area includes a variety of statistical tools including but not limited to: Pareto diagrams, cau and effect diagrams, stratified sampling, advanced problem solving techniques, DOE, 8D,
Drill Deep and Drill Wide and identification of critical characteristics, etc.
Comments / Objective Evidence:
Score:
