2015御门听政年5月16日雅思写作真题回忆
小作文：
The diagram shows the stages of processing cocoa beans.
大作文：
澳洲：Health experts claim that walking is the best exerci. However people are walking less on a daily basis. What has made it happen and how to deal with this?
大陆：刘原龙To improve the quality of education, people think that we should encourage our students to evaluate and criticize their teachers. Others believe that it will result in a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss on both sides and give your own opinion.
类似旧题:
05.04.09
Nowadays education quality is very low. Some people think we should encourage our stu
dents to evaluate and critici their teachers. Others believe that it will result in a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss on both sides.
08.06.21
Some people think that children should obey the rules or do what their parents and teachers want them to do. Other people think that children controlled too much can’t deal with problem themlves. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.彭祖文化
少数民族歌曲 这次作文的题型为讨论类，题材为教育类，据今天考试的学生反映，今天的大作文难度适中，考生们只要在备考的过程中训练过教育类题材基本上都有能力应对这个题目。且看名师带来的写作分析和范文：
写作基本思路：本文分为四段，考生们需要对“应该”和“不应该”两方观点进行展开论证。例文中分别对“学生应该对老师进行评价”和“学生不应该对老师进行评价”这两个观点进行了论证，最后结论给出“应该评价”和“不应该评价”的优缺点，保持中立态度。
插叙作文
Para1：紧扣题目，描述题目中所出现的现象，提出中立观点，给出将在接下来段落中所讨论的主题。
Para2：从“学生应该给老师评价”拓展分析，指出学生评价老师这个行为会带给学生和老师什么样的正面效果。
Para3：从“学生不应该给老师评价”拓展分析，指出学生评价老师这个行为会带来的负面效果，从而表现出雅思考试要求考生需要掌握的辩证讨论的能力。
Para4：总结全文并且点题，再一次强调自己中立的观点。
参考词汇：
Evaluate v.评价，评估
Discipline n.规矩，规则
Feedback n.反馈
Performance n.表现
Downside n.负面，消极面
Embolden v.鼓励，使...有胆量
Immature adj.不成熟的
Entail v.牵涉
Counterproductive adj.事与愿违的
Disruptive adj.破坏的
文字控Impartial adj.公平的，公正的
参考范文
In order to guarantee the quality of education, many educators propo that students should be entitled to evaluate and criticize their teachers. However, others stand on a different ground. They claim that it will lead to disrespect and a loss of discipline in the classroom.
On the one hand, we cannot deny the fact that students' evaluation can guarantee the teaching quality to some extent. Conceivably, if teachers receive feedback with regards to
their classroom performance from students, they can adjust the contents or styles accordingly for the purpo of meeting the students' needs. In this n, it not only facilitates the communication between students and teachers, but also improves the quality of education.
On the other hand, however, this policy may entail certain downside. Provided that students are emboldened to criticize their teachers without any limitation or regulation, it may end up counterproductive. Immature or disruptive students who do not respect teachers will take advantage of this chance to criticize their teachers or even utter insults. Under such circumstances, it will definitely discourage teachers and disrupt normal classroom activities, which is not advantageous for improving the quality of education at all.
In my point of view, appropriate evaluation about teachers' teaching quality is acceptable, whereas irresponsible criticisms or offensive words, which may afflict teachers' dignity or interrupt classroom order, are neither suitable nor recommendable. In other words, students can be encouraged to give teachers impartial evaluations but it has to be carried
满楼红袖招out in such a way that caus no trouble to teacher’s normal classroom performance. (257 words 100edu提供)
范文二：
For ages, well-acknowledged obrvation of the nation has fallen on the outcomes of education and the effective ways of improving the quality of schooling. After reforming educational system, amending textbooks and supervising examinations, authorities and schools convert their attention to teachers’ asssment from students. Some enthusiastically advocate that it can be a feasible method to enhance teaching quality while others rai their doubts on the objectivity. To my best knowledge, I contend that appropriate and objective evaluation from students can prompts teachers’ performance.
On one hand, students, as the recipients of teaching, are qualified to asss their teachers. The direct result of teaching is, undoubtedly, students’ scores in tests, but it is subject to students’ mood conditions and learning levels. Therefore, teachers’ performanc
e is suppod to be evaluated with accordance to other indicators like teaching methods, teaching attitudes as well as teaching atmosphere. As a result, students, who have the clost and most frequent interactions, should be the ones giving their opinions and suggestions on their teachers. What’s more, the regular and proper feedback is likely to satisfy the needs of different students. The critical respon from all of the students can help teachers have a better understanding of their students, and thus, knowing more about their students’ demand, teachers are able to acquire the expected outcomes and avoid students’ disappointment and teaching failures.
On the other hand, becau some of the students are not objective enough, it might cau inaccurate appraisal about their teachers. In other words, some of the students might dislike a certain teacher for his personalities or other unknown reasons. The extreme emotions, in turn, will naturally influence their comments and the feedback could not be reliable or even wor, could be offensive. Under such situations, teaching evaluation los its origin functions; rather, it becomes a platform to show students’ disres
pect to their teachers.
In summary, a proper asssment system should be built up, and with reasonable comments and valid feedback, it can be an effective practice to improve teaching quality.（启扬）
