The impact of globalization has been largely positive. Discuss.侦探名言
Reviewing veral different definitions of globalization, it appears that it can be summarized as the growth in economic, political and cultural exchanges to a worldwide or global scale. To a certain extent, the great achievements in communication technology and transportation system, which em to be the main impetus of globalization, are immediately related to the income improvement and industrialization of developing countries in Asia and Africa, and the promotion of cultural interaction and international understanding. However, Buckley (1998) notes that the wealth gap has considerably rin in the past half century, and that international organizations like the UN are unable to deal with some new problems caud by globalization such as ‘organized crime’. P长鹿农庄门票essimistic globalists and transformationalists also point out cultural diversity loss and ‘culture invasion’ which resulted from globalization (Held, 2004)世界的另一个我. By considering the relevant evidence on the effects of globalization from economic, political and cultural perspectives respectively, this essay will demonstrate that the overall impact of globalization is more negative, though there are numerous facts which exemplify the positive role it has played in economic, politic
al and cultural development (Buckley, 1998).
Regarding economic globalization, there has been a great disparity between the North and South in the last few decades. This economic disparity 如何做春饼profoundly manifests in the over-concentration of wealth in developed countries and a few rich people (Buckley, 1998). On the one hand, due to the disparity in ‘industrial development’, developing countries are compelled to export raw materials at lower prices and import manufactured products from developed countries at high prices; in addition, despite the fact that the volume of foreign trade has rin in recent years, developing countries like Africa still account for a strikingly low portion of international trade. Conquently, it is the developed countries that most benefit from globalization, and it is much more unrealistic for developing countries to catch up with the developed countries (Buckley, 1998). On the other hand, since the economic profit could ldom be distributed equally within a country, the improvement in the average per-capita income may probably not embody the income improvement of the majority. Soars (2008) states that although the per-capita income in China appeared to ri by $2600 from 1980 to 2000, and the number in India h
as more than doubled from 1980 to 1996, it could be the conquence of a significant income ri among a few rich people instead of the overall increa among the majority. Therefore, the effect of globalization on increasing the economic gap between the rich and the poor is so significant that its narrowing effect is far more insignificant when compared with its widening effect.
As for the trend of political globalization, many new problems such as ‘organized crime’ brought about by globalization are beyond the control of any global organization including the UN; also, the concentration of political power has been deepened, which is clearly against the trend of democracy (Buckley, 1998). First, the advancement in network technology has greatly exacerbated ‘organized crime’. For example, the right-wingers in Germany establish connection with each other through the specialized network named Thule-Netz. While internet technology has fostered both international and national communication, it makes ‘organized crime’ grow at a much higher speed (Buckley, 1998). Second, to a great degree, globalization is the principal cau of ‘global anarchy’. Global organization like the UN tend to be active in creating a more fair political climate and impr
oving international relationships, but yet the emingly joint decisions reprent the interest of the majority in that superpowers such as the US play a dominant role in international society and may impo their force and desire on the weaker nations (Held,2004). As a result, political globalization actually has intensified regional conflicts and over-centralization of the powers rather than prerving worldwide peace and democracy.
In regard to the cultural globalization, the world has become ‘less diver and more homogenous’ (Held, 2004). This negative influence mainly shows in two aspects: the loss of cultural loss and ‘cultural invasions’. Firstly, as a main feature and a valuable treasure of mankind civilizations (Buckley, 1998), cultural diversity has a concentrated reflection in national language; nevertheless, while the number of countries that using English has incread, the number of national languages has decread significantly. Although the wide u of English as a common language between nations appears to facilitate international communication and promote mutual understanding, it caus irretrievable loss in language diversity. Secondly, pessimistic globalists emphasized the declination
of ‘national identity’ caud by ‘cultural invasion’ (Held, 2004). Their view is also supported by Buckley (1998) who shows that:噱头怎么读音
[The significant growth in worldwide] tourism has made the retention of traditional cultures more difficult while giving it new economic value … the world is being reshaped according to American values … The influx of tourists with different cultural values creates tensions in the receiving community – which may be suppresd when the economic benefits is sufficient large but may rankle beneath the surface (Buckley, 1998).
Therefore, cultural globalization has brought different communities clor, but it can also result in irretrievable loss of ‘cultural diversity’ and ‘cultural invasion’, which has caud much more latent hostility between nations.
To conclude, although globalization has some positive influence on the development of the world, the overall impact in economics, politics and culture is mostly negative. First of all, with the expansion of economic globalization, the North-South gap has been widened significantly, though open policy ems to make developed countries richer. Next, in spite
of the function as a good communications platform, the intergovernmental system faces vere challenges brought about by globalization; meanwhile, this system is more likely to result in over-centralization of political power. Last, though cultural globalization appears to propel cultural exchanges and international understanding, it often leads to the irretrievable loss of ‘cultural diversity’ and ‘cultural invasion’, and has caud much more 关于父爱的作文potential tension. Conquently, the dramatic gap in aspect of economics, politics and culture amongst nations and individuals all contribute to the rious diquilibrium of the world as a whole; thus, the overall impact of globalization is largely negative.
>设备维修保养制度
