专业英语四级（作文）模拟试卷195 (题后含答案及解析)打开谷歌
题型有： 6. WRITING
PART VI WRITING
1． Read carefully the following excerpt on garbage classification and then write your respon in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which you should: - summarize the main message of the excerpt, and then - comment on whether individuals and companies should be punished for incorrectly disposing of garbage. You should support yourlf with information from the excerpt. Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks. Greater Public Participation Needed to Sort Garbage Correctly Residents will be fined 50 yuan maximum and organizations not more than 50,000 yuan for not throwing rubbish correctly in Guangzhou, capital of south China’s Guangdong province. The regulation will take effect on Sep. 1 this year. An official with the local city planning man
agement ctor said that the organizations that fail to correctly dispo of garbage will be fined in the grace period, but individuals violating the rules will not be punished. Property management companies worried about the effective implementation of the regulation, saying that they can only encourage or persuade residents to put waste in the right places but they are not able to fine the violators. They have to pay more money to hire cleaners to relocate the rubbish to the right places, which means the property management fees will accordingly ri. Currently the law enforcement department is only responsible for supervising whether the waste in the residential areas is correctly dispod, and as for how to require individuals to handle garbage classification, it is up to the property management companies. This ems to clearly define the roles and responsibilities of different parties, but the lack of public participation might undermine the intentions of the garbage-sorting campaign. The garbage classification law is something new in China, and the relevant government departments should pay more attention to raising public awareness to deal with garbage correctly instead of simply imposing harsh punishments on them.
php模板
正确答案： Unnecessary to Punish People for Incorrect Garbage Disposal A regulation, which stipulates fines for individuals and organizations who fail to correctly dispo garbage, is due to take effect this year. The new regulation is aimed at raising public awareness of dealing with garbage. Although the roles are well defined for the property management companies and the law enforcement department, the former still fret over the effective implementation of the regulation becau they have no rights to fine the violators. As far as I am concerned, punishments for incorrectly disposing of garbage are not necessary. To begin with, the authorities have long ignored to teach citizens how to properly dispo of garbage. Conquently, a majority of citizens have no knowledge of throwing rubbish correctly. Therefore, however heavy the punishments may be, the effort will only come to naught. Besides, compared with punishments, the better way to rai public awareness of correctly disposing of rubbish is the spread of knowledge. Government should conduct more activities to teach people the exact way of dealing with garbage. Only when the people have a thorough understanding of how to handle their garbage can they really participate in the correct garbage disposal. In conclusion, I think punishments for incorrect disposal of garbage are unnecessary.
变更诉讼请求申请书解析： 本题主要讨论是否应该因为不合理处理垃圾而受罚。首先应当总结概括材料中内容，再给出自己的观点。文章结构可安排如下： 第一段：简要概括材料内容，提出自己的看法——因不合理处理垃圾而受罚是没有必要的。 第二段：分两点论证自己的观点。首先，由于有关单位忽视教会市民如何正确处理垃圾，因此大部分人并不知道如何合理处理垃圾，罚款只能是徒劳无功；再者，与罚款相比，更有效的措施莫过于传播垃圾要如何合理处理的相关知识。 第三段：总结全文，重申观点——因不合理处理垃圾而受罚是没有必要的。 知识模块：作文
写荷花的诗句2． Read carefully the following excerpt on wanghong effect and then write your respon in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which you should: - summarize the main message of the excerpt, and then - comment on wanghong effect. You should support yourlf with information from the excerpt. Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks. Cyber-Celebrity Culture is Warping Chine Youth The recent online debut of a new girl band, who calls themlves “Sunshine”, has made waves on the interwebs. The teens, with their “unattractive”时间同步失败 and “fat” appearance
and laughably bad singing skills, induce ferocious criticism, but at the same time, thrive on it. This, of cour, is not the first time that ugly, untalented wannabe celebrities have made headlines in China. Back in 2006, Furong Jiejie (“Sister Lotus”), a 20-something woman in Bening, posted her narcissistic pictures of plump figure, plain face and inelegant dance moves. Tho won her a nationwide following as well as paid appearances on television. Surely enough, after Sister Lotus started appearing on prime-time television, a whole slew of copycat “ugly” girls also started blogging about themlves. And following Sunshine’遍行s explosion on social media, numerous new bands like “Power Girls” 松茸的吃法“Love-wings” and “Superstar” starring average-looking adolescent girls started popping up on people’s mobiles. Some people think that this kind of grass roots lf-promotion is fantastic for Chine youth who may not otherwi have any opportunities or privileges to get them ahead in China’s competitive society, but for tho middle-class kids who come from good backgrounds and receive excellent educations, there is a rising concern among parents that social networking is distracting the kids from academics. What’s wor, they also fear that the narcissistic addictions of the stude
nts to social media will interfere with learning knowledge and real-life skills, leaving an entire generation of wired youth with absolutely no other recour once their online followers forget about them.
正确答案： The Negative Effects of Wanghong Effect China is witnessing the internet swarming with wanghong, the grass-root internet celebrities who win nationwide popularity by pulling stunts. Some people deem this as a good way for the wanghong to get themlves known. But for parents of students who receive good educations, they fret over the distractions of the social networking on their children that may eventually leave them with no real-life skills and knowledge to survive in the future. As far as I am concerned, this wanghong effect will exert negative influences on our society. To begin with, the internet celebrities’ behaviors convey wrong values to children or teenagers. A majority of internet celebrities attract their followers by conducting delirious, dangerous activities, making cynical remarks about things people hold a grudge against, showing off their wealth, or even wor, displaying violence and x. This will undeniably shape the kids’ values in a negative way. What’s more, wanghong effect pos a threat to the social
order. For example, the recent news has it that some wanghong dined on an underground train during rush hours. This not only prents a threat to other pasngers’ safety, but also breaches the traffic rules. In conclusion, I think the wanghong effect will exert negative influences on our society.
解析： 本题的主旨是对网红效应做出评价。首先应当总结概括材料中内容，再给出自己的观点。文章结构可安排如下： 第一段：简要概括材料内容，提出自己的看法——网红效应带给我们社会的影响是消极的。 第二段：分两点铺陈论述自己的观点。第一，他们发表的内容传达的是错误的价值观；第二，网红效应对社会秩序造成威胁。 第三段：总结全文，重申观点——网红效应对我们社会的影响是消极的。 知识模块：作文
3． Recently, “workfare” has been developed in some countries to replace the traditional “unemployment welfare”. Under “workfare” models, welfare recipients are obliged to perform some work or undergo training in exchange for their welfare payments. Do you think “workfare” models are a nsible choice. The following are the supporters’ and opponents’ opinions. Read carefully the opinions from both sides and write your resp
on in NO LESS THAN 200 words, in which you should first summarize briefly the opinions from both sides and give your view on the issue. Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization, language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks. YES Workfare offers the unemployed opportunities to develop skills to work their way out of poverty. Productive work rais the expectations of tho involved by increasing their lf-respect and provides them with more confidence in their abilities. It also develops skills associated with work, such as time keeping, taking and giving instructions, working in a team, accepting responsibility and prioritising. Such skills may em mundane, but they are very valuable to employers. Workfare schemes require applicants also to arch for work whilst completing the schemes. Moving from a traditional something-for-nothing welfare scheme to a workfare system stops all the individuals from being burdens on the state, cutting welfare rolls very rapidly and allowing the government to concentrate upon assisting the truly needy. NO Workfare is actually a more expensive option than traditional unemployment benefit. The jobless are ultimately given at least the same amo
unt of taxpayers’ money, but the state also has to pay the costs of tting up the schemes, the materials, the wages of supervisors, transport and childcare, etc. In a recession, when the numbers of the unemployed ri substantially, the costs of work-fare schemes could be prohibitive and lead to the collap of the policy. Furthermore, even if the state wanted to, they couldn’t enroll everyone—given that most people who lo a job find another within six months, there’s no point dragging people into the schemes who will find work anyway given a little more time.
