Manuscript review
Recommendation
1. Publish after minor changes
北京就业2. Publish unaltered
3. Review again after major changes
4. Reject (Paper is not of sufficient quality or novelty to be published in this Journal)
5. Reject (Paper is riously flawed; do not encourage resubmission.)
A. Evaluation
1. How do you evaluate the manuscript?
Excellent
Good
聂海胜现代古诗词Fair
如何练嗓音让声音变好听Poor
B. Content
1. Is this paper of original value?
大喷嚏
Yes, definitely
To some extent
Hardly
I cannot judge this
2. Is this paper scientifically correct?
Yes
Probably, although all details have not been checked
Doubtful
3. To what extent will the results be uful for other scientists?
Large
Average
Small
4. How would you characterize the level of the paper?
For experts only
Uful for people working in related fields
Understandable also for nonspecialists
Superficial
6. Is the bibliography reasonable?
Yes
After minor modifications
No
C. Prentation
1. Is this title adequate?
Yes
转委托
No
2. Does the abstract give a correct description of the content?
Yes
No
3. Is the general organization of the paper acceptable?常规消毒
Yes
No
4. With respect to the content, is the length of the paper reasonable?
Yes
No, should be incread
No, should be decread
5. How do you rate readability?
Good
Some effort needed
Large effort needed
Unreadable
>皮肤黑黄
