●Dicto Simpliciter 绝对判断(Latin: "from a maxim without qualification", meaning "from a universal rule") or ad dictum simpliciter (Latin: "to a maxim without qualification", meaning "to a universal rule") are Latin phras for a type of logical fallacy. The 软考答案a (meaning "from") is often omitted when this phra is ud in English, being mistaken for an indefinite article照相机折纸.
A dicto simpliciter fallacies are deductive fallacies that occur in statistical syllogisms. A dicto simpliciter occurs when an acceptable exception is ignored or eliminated.
●Hasty Generalization管理团队方案草率结论 is a logical fallacy of faulty generalization by reaching an inductive generalization bad on insufficient evidence. It commonly involves basing a broad conclusion upon the statistics of a survey of a small group that fails to sufficiently reprent the whole population.
●Post Hoc牵强附会, Latin for "after this, therefore becau of this", is a logical fallacy (of the questionable cau variety) that states, "Since that event followed this one, th
at event must have been caud by this one." It is often shortened to simply post hoc个人简历如何写 and is also sometimes referred to as fal cau, coincidental correlation, or correlation not causation. It is subtly different from the fallacy cum hoc ergo propter hoc, in which the chronological ordering of a correlation is insignificant.
和平鸽简笔画●Contradictory Premis矛盾前提 Conclusions are drawn from the interactions of premis: where two premis contradict each other, there can be no interaction and hence no conclusion. Similarly, if the definitions of two terms conflict with or exclude each other, then tho two terms cannot be simultaneously ascribed to a single object or event.养兔子
●Ad Miricordiam文不对题 is a fallacy中班家长寄语 in which someone tries to win support for an argument or idea by exploiting her or his opponent's feelings of pity or guilt. The appeal to pity is a specific kind of appeal to emotion.
●Fal Analogy错误类比 is an informal fallacy applying to inductive arguments. It is often mistakenly considered to be a formal fallacy, but it is not, becau a fal ana
logy consists of an error in the substance of an argument (the content of the analogy itlf), not an error in the logical structure of the argument.
●Hypothesis Contrary to Fact 与事实相反的假设 This fallacy consists in treating a hypothetical claim as if it were a statement of fact by making a claim, without sufficient evidence, about what would have happened in the past if other conditions had been prent or an event that will occur in the future.
●Poisoning the W峤怎么读ell井下放毒 (or attempting to poison the well) is a logical fallacy where adver information about a target is pre-emptively prented to an audience, with the intention of discrediting or ridiculing everything that the target person is about to say.
