Are interpersonal relationships more important than one’s practical ability to a successful career?
Good morning, everyone we are the objective part. I am debater 1 Han B .
I am debater 2 Du Fa .
We are the negative part. I am debater 1 Ding Wen.
I am debater 2 Li o.
正方立论
Interpersonal relationships means social interaction among the crowd, and cooperation is very important in today's society, we believe that human relationships are more important than individual ability.
Interpersonal relationships may help people lf-understanding. They can be ud to test whether you are health or not in the psychological.
In the enterpri, a top staff should know how to handle interpersonal relationships, and has harmonious relations with colleagues, if he have not good interpersonal relationships, I don’t think he will be able to improve his ability or achieve success. So that our sides insist on that relationships are more important for success
女娲造人的神话故事反方立论
自助旅游We believe that personal ability is particularly important in the work. Human capacity is the esntial. It is the most important thing for you to success. Only the capacity is real, it is the way to inflect the world. It can help you obtain the right to compete. So, our sides insist on that one’s practical ability is more important for success.
卧蚕是什么自由辩论
反方:Thinks for the opponent
正方：
反方：Is Bill Gates successful?
正方：Sure, he is a successful man.
反方：Which do you think more important about his success, his personal capacity or the interpersonal relationships?
正方：At that time, we do not understand the situation
反方：We don’t think you can admit that the personal capacity is more important , can you?
正方：“May be it is true, but according to a Harvard Business School Survey: people in the great achievements in their career, 26 percents rely on the ability to work, 5 percents on the family background, and interpersonal relationships accounted for 69 percents. How can you explain this?
调控手段反方：Isn’t good relationship the performance of individual capability?
正方：I think it’s not. Capacity can be trained compared with interpersonal relationships. That is to say: it is the difference between life and work, do you think so?
反方：So that what you learn is to do a good job in interpersonal relationships in the school, rather than a personal capacity？
正方：Of cour not, we said that if you have not a good relationship you won’t get success. Your personal ability is important, but Interpersonal relationships are more important.
反方：Perhaps you think that if you have good interpersonal relations, you will be promoted. But if you have not the ability to work, nobody will support you.
正方：Ok, you have strong ability 亲信干政and do the job very good, but without good human relations, who will support you?
反方：Why don’t you think the success of Bill Gates is supported?
正方：We do the work according to u the machine which is designed. Thus, is the interpersonal relationship more important in daily life?
反方：Your meaning is that the human will be replaced for machine, do you?
正方：We don’t think it, but some ability of the human is replacing at prent
史怀哲总结陈词
正方: We agree that the personal ability is very important. But the interpersonal relationships are more important to a successful career. In today's society, we all know that teamwork plays the most important role in competition. Teamwork need good interpersonal relationships .If one person can’t get on well with the colleagues. There will be no cooperation. No cooperation mean no success. So that our sides insist on that relationships are more important for success.
夕阳西下打一地名
各类小吃反方：We can e that now people pay much attention to interpersonal relationships, but we still think one’s practical ability is more important than interpersonal relationships to a successful career. Your boss will not think much about your interpersonal relationships, he just thinks a lot about how much profit you can create for him. Only strong practical ability can make a successful career. We insist on our viewpoint: one’s practical ability is more important than interpersonal relationships to a su
The relationship between lf-report abilities and personality was examined at both the phenotypic (zero-order) level as well as at the genetic and environmental levels. Twins and siblings (N = 516) completed lf-report ability and personality questionnaires. A factor analysis of the ability questions revealed 10 factors, including politics, interpersonal relationships, practical tasks, intellectual pursuits, academic skills, entrepreneur/business, domestic skills, vocal abilities, and creativity. Five personality factors were examined, including extraversion, conscientiousness, dependence, aggression, and openness. At the phenotypic level, the correlations between the ability factor scores and personality factor scores ranged from 0 to .60 (between political abilities and extraversion). The relationship between the two areas at the genetic level was found to range between –.01 and .60; the environmental correlations ranged from –.01 to .48. The results suggest that some of the lf-report ability scores are related to lf-report personality, and that some of the obrved relationships may have a common genetic basis while others are from a common environmental factor.
