让座英语
1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with experti in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and ntence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
◆ In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical me
thods ud in the study.
◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did the various experiments
should be provided.
3、对于研究设计的rationale:
Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：
The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show
if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.
5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：
A hypothesis needs to be prented。
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：
What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?
7、对研究问题的定义：
Try to t the problem discusd in this paper in more clear,
write one ction to define the problem
8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review:
99年属什么的生肖
The topic is novel but the application propod is not so novel.等级
9、对claim,如A＞B的证明，verification:
There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.
10、严谨度问题：
MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.
双鱼座性格特点男11、格式（重视程度）：
◆ In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is clo but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with "Instructions for Authors" which shows examples.
◆ Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, plea consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the "Instructions and Forms" button in he upper right-hand corner of the scre
en.
12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：
有关语言的审稿人意见：
◆ It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with experti in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and ntence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.
◆ The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing rvice before submission; only then can a proper review be performed. Most ntences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not complete ntences.
◆ As prented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are pro
blems with ntence structure, verb ten, and clau construction.
◆ The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We str
ongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is well-verd i
n English or who native language is English.
◆ Plea have someone competent in the English language and the subject matte
r of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?
◆ the quality of English needs improving.
寄宿舍来自编辑的鼓励：
Encouragement from reviewers:
◆ I would be very glad to re-review the paper in greater depth once it has be
en edited becau the subject is interesting.
◆ There is continued interest in your manuscript titled "……" which you subm
itted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Rearch: Part B - Applied Biomat
erials.
◆ The Submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of publication.
∙The paper is very annoying to read as it is riddled with grammatical errors and poorly constructed ntences. Furthermore, the novelty and motivation of the work is not well justified. Also, the experimental study is shallow. In fact, I cant figure out the legends as it is too small! How does your effort compares with state-of-the-art??
三伏时间∙The experiment is the major problem in the paper. Not only the datat is not published, but also the description is very rough. It is impossible to replicate the experiment and verify the claim of the author. Furthermore, almost no discussion for the experimental result is given. E.g. why the author would obtain this result? Which component is the most important? Any further improvement?
主要特点及具体事例∙the author should concentrated on the new algorithm with your idea and explained its advantages clearly with a most simple words.
回旋肌
∙it is good concept, but need to polish layout, language.
∙The authors did a good job in motivating the problem studied in the introduction. The mathematic explanation of the propod solutions is also nice. Furthermore, the paper is accompanied by an adequate t of experiments for evaluating the effectiveness of the solutions the authors propo.
