Ecolinguistics杂志社英文
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ecolinguistics emerged in the 1990’s as a new paradigm of linguistic rearch which took into account not only the social context in which language is embedded, but also the ecological context in which societies are embedded. Michael Halliday's 1990 paper New ways of Meaning: the challenge to applied linguistics is often credited as a minal work which provided the stimulus for linguists to consider the ecological context and conquences of language. Among other things, the challenge that Halliday put forward was to make linguistics relevant to the issues and concerns of the 21st century, particularly the widespread destruction of ecosystems. The main example Halliday gave was that of ‘economic growth’, where he described how the orientation of the English language with regard to unmarked terms such as large, grow, tall, and good gives growth a positive aspect, despite the negative ecological conquences. Since Halliday's initial comments, the field of ecolinguistics has developed considerably, a recent development being the appli
cation of ecolinguistics to Education for Sustainability by the Language & Ecology Rearch Forum. The discipline of ecolinguistics is traditionally divided into two main branches, eco-critical discour analysis and linguistic ecology (e Fill 1996), although this distinction has been criticized as reductionist (e Steffenn 2007). Ecolinguistics could be regarded as a branch of ecomiotics (Selvamony 2007).
Eco-critical discour analysis
Eco-critical discour analysis includes, but is not limited to, the application of critical discour analysis to texts about the environment and environmentalism, in order to reveal underlying ideologies (eg, Harré et al. 1999, Stibbe 2006, 2005a, 2005b). In its fullest formation, it includes analysis of any discour which has potential conquences for the future of ecosystems, such as neoliberal economic discour and discursive constructions of consumerism, gender, politics, agriculture and nature (eg, Goatly 2000, Stibbe 2004). Eco-critical discour analysis does not just focus on exposing potentially damaging ideologies, but also arches for discursive reprentations which can contribute to a more ecologically sustainable society.
Linguistic ecology
雅思口语练习网站Pioneered by Einar Haugen, this branch of linguistics us the metaphor of an ecosystem to describe relationships and interaction among the diver forms of language found in the world, and the groups of people who speak them. A healthy language ecology consisting of a wide diversity of forms of language is claimed to be esntial for healthy ecosystems, since local ecological knowledge is built into local language varieties (e Mühlhäusler 1995). The term was actually coined in an article by C.F. Voegelin, F.M. Voegelin and Noel Schutz on the "Language Situation" in Arizona. See Voegelin, Voegelin and Schutz, 1967 (this was, of cour, acknowledged by Haugen).
cost的用法Resources
Language & Ecology Rearch Forum ()
--contains a wide range of resources including the online journal Language & Ecology, and an international network of ecolinguists
The Ecolinguistics Website (www-gewi.kfunigraz.ac.at/ed/project/ecoling)复习的英语
The Language, Ecology and Society Website (www.languageecologysociety)
References
∙ Bang, Jørgen Christian and Jørgen Døør (2007) Language, Ecology and Society. A Dialectical Approach. Edited by Sune Vork Steffenn and Joshua Nash. London: Continuum.
业余爱好英文查询四级成绩∙ Bastardas-Boada, Albert (1996) Ecologia de les llengtake careües. Medi, contactes i dinàwing是什么意思mica sociolingüística [Ecology of languages. Context, contacts and sociolinguistic dynamics]. Barcelona: Proa.
∙ Bastardas-Boada, Albert (2002) "Biological and linguistic diversity: Transdisciplinary explorations for a socioecology of languages" Diverscité langues, vol. VII.
∙ Bastardas-Boada, Albert (2002) “The Ecological perspective: Benefits and risks for Soci
olinguistics and Language Policy and Planning”, in: Fill, Alwin, Hermine Penz, & W. Trampe (eds.), Colourful Green Ideas. Berna: Peter Lang, pp. 77–88.
∙ Bastardas-Boada, Albert (2007) "Linguistic sustainability for a multilingual humanity" Glossa. An Interdisciplinary Journal vol. 2, num. 2.
∙ Calvet, Jean-Louis (1999) Pour une écologie des langues du monde. Plon
∙ Fill, Alwin (1996): "Ökologie der Linguistik - Linguistik der Ökologie." In: Alwin Fill (ed.): Sprachökologie und Ökolinguistik. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Linguistik. Pp. 3–16.
∙ Fill, Alwin and Peter Mühlhäusler (2001) The ecolinguistics reader. London: Continuum.
∙ Goatly, Andrew (2000) Critical reading and writing: an introductory courbook. London: Routledge
抱歉的意思
∙ Halliday, Michael (1990) New ways of meaning: the challenge to applied linguistics. Reprinted in Fill and Mü胚根hlhäusler (2001) pp175–202
∙ Harré, Rom and Jens Brockmeier and Peter Mühlhäusler (1999) Greenspeak: a Study of Environmental Discour. London: Sage.
