SCI 投稿全过程信件模板
SCI 投稿全过程信件模板一览
一、最初投稿Cover letter
Dear Editors:
We would like to submit the enclod manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be considered for publication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original rearch that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elwhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclod.
In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.
The following is a list of possible reviewers for your consideration:
1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××
2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××
We deeply appreciate your consideration of our manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the reviewers. If you have any queries, plea don’t hesitate to contact me at the address below.
Thank you and best regards.
Yours sincerely,
××××××
Corresponding author:
Name: ×××
E-mail: ××××@××××
二、催稿信
Dear Prof. ×××:
Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submitted manuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of 千金市骨翻译“With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted to jour
nal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been nt to reviewers or not?
I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time check the status for us. I am very plead to hear from you on the reviewer’s comments.
Thank you very much for your consideration.
Best regards!
Yours sincerely,
××××××
Corresponding author:
Name: ×××
E-mail: ××××@××××
三、修改稿Cover letter
Dear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）:
On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revis
e our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).
We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revi our manuscript according to the comments. Attached plea find the revid version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.
We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thank you and best regards.
Yours sincerely,
××××××
Corresponding author:
Name: ×××
E-mail: ××××@××××
四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）
List of Respons
Dear Editors and Reviewers:
你是哪里人英文Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Tho comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our rearches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revid portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:
apple retail storeResponds to the reviewer’s comments:
Reviewer #1:
1. Respon to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Respon: ××××××
2. Respon to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Respon: ××××××
。
。。。。。晒黑后如何快速美白
逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏
针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：
We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...
We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...
It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……
We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.
We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion
As Reviewer suggested that……
Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……
最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：
Special thanks to you for your good comments.
Reviewer #2:
同上述
Reviewer #3:
winsys
让梦想照进现实
××××××
Other changes:
1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”
2. Line 107, “……” was added
3. Line 129, “……” was deleted
××××××
We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. The changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revid paper.
We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.
Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.
五、文章接受后可以考虑感谢一下负责你文章的编辑或主编（根据需要）
Dear Prof. ××××××:
Thanks very much for your kind work and consideration on publication of our paper. On b
ehalf of my co-authors, we would like to express our great appreciation to editor and reviewers.
Thank you and best regards.
Yours sincerely,brita
××××××
Corresponding author:
Name: ×××
E-mail: ××××@××××
六、询问校稿信件（如果文章接受后时间较长）
Dear ×××:
Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure if it is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of our accepted manuscript titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号), since the copyright agreement for publication has been nt to you two months ago. I am just wondering that how long I can receive the proof of our manuscript from you?
I would be greatly appreciated if you could spend some of your time for a reply. I am very
plead to hear from you.
replaceallThank you very much for your consideration.
Yours sincerely,
××××××
Corresponding author:
Name: ×××
E-mail: ××××@××××
七、文章校稿信件
Dear Mr. ×××:
Thanks very much for your kind letter about the proof of our paper titled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号) for publication in “Journal Name”. We have finished the proof reading and checking carefully, and some corrections about the proof and the answers to the queries are provided below.
Corrections:
1. In ****** should be **** (Page ***, Right column, line***)
2. In **** the “*****” should be “****” (Page ****, Right column, line****)
Answers for “author queries”:
1. *********************.
2. **********************
3. **********************
We greatly appreciate the efficient, professional and rapid processing of our paper by your team. If there is anything el we should do, plea do not hesitate to let us know.
Thank you and best regards.
Yours sincerely,
××××××
Corresponding author:
Name: bich×××
E-mail: ××××@××××
How to publish in Top Journals
Kwan Choi, Editor, RIE
Revid, March 7, 2002
Since February 1, 1998
In respon to popular demands, this brief note is provided for the benefit of all academic authors. The original intent was to produce a book of advice, but time is a scarce commodity and you may have to wait indefinitely for a book-length summary.
This brief manual provides uful suggestions for today's authors. The goal is to "foster the greatest good to the greatest number of people."1 If this note is uful to you, plea tell your friends about it. If you follow most of the rules, the probability of achieving tenure or promotion may increa significantly. If most authors acquired the basic skills mentioned here, they would then be competing in terms of the beauty of their ideas, not in terms of cosmetic skills.
Disclaimer
Plea note that the advice contained here may not necessarily improve the chances you
r earch papers will be published. By downloading or acquiring a copy of this guide, you agree that:
In no event shall the author be liable for any indirect, incidental, collateral, exemplary, conquential, or special damages or loss arising out of your u of rules suggested in this guide.
Contents
Subjects | Options* | Remark |
Introduction | PDF HTML | Purpo, acceptance rates, references |
General Publication Strategies 南洋中学 | PDF HTML | This ction covers 28 long-term, general suggestions. |
Writing Strategies | PDF HTML | This ction explains 39 helpful recommendations about writing papers. |
Preparation and Submission | PDF HTML | It covers 18 dos and don'ts when submitting a paper to a journal. |
Rejection and Revision | PDF HTML | This ction includes 12 ways to deal with rejection and how to revi manuscripts when you receive an invitation to revi. |
Being a Good Referee | PDF HTML | Of cour, you have to be a good referee to become a successful writer. 11 rules to guide good reviewing are offered here. |
Qustions and Answers | PDF HTML | Here are some questions raid by readers. |
| | |
*Internet Explorer displays the pages more accurately than Netscape. For printing, download PDF files.
Comments or Questions
If you have comments or questions, plea contact me.
Acknowledgment
I thank all tho who made helpful comments and suggestions. The usual caveats apply.
Note
1. Urantia Book (p. 1488)
Rejected
The editorial process is impersonal; do not take rejection personally. Keep trying.
1. Will the next submission be affected by previous rejections?
No. Your past history of success or failure has no bearing on your next submission. No ca
usality, period. Editorial decisions are bad on the contents or the ideas contained in that particular paper.
2. Some papers are rejected becau the ideas are not well developed in your paper. In this ca, you may further refine the paper. If, as a result, the paper is different in substance, it can be submitted as a new paper.
3. " 'The stupid referee' did not understand my paper."
This is usually an expositional problem on your part.
4. You may request a reconsideration of your paper if the negative decision was bad on
▪ incompetence of referees, or
▪ alleged factual or mathematical errors, when in fact the referee made a mistake.
Both of the can be verified, in principle, by others. We will try to get another opinion.
5. However, do not claim this too frequently, or you may lo credibility in the future.
To Request a Reconsideration
< >
When you request a cond or third opinion, nd a message via e-mail, fax, or snail mail, specifying the reasons: (i) incompetent referee, or (ii) mathematical/factual errors.
If it is deemed that your paper derves a cond or third opinion, you will be informed so. Then proceed with the next step. Otherwi, the process ends here.
Include (i) 2 copies of the latest version, (ii) an additional submission fee, and (iii)a letter, stating the same reason above (e-mail messages do not contain signatures and hence cannot be treated as official). Remember, when you request a reconsideration, the paper should not be submitted elwhere simultaneously for publication consideration. The editorial office intends to provide a fair refereeing process to all authors. However, additional referees must be persuaded to review the paper. (The editorial office awards a one-year subscription to reviewers.)
