保护性功能的等离子前列腺电切术和等离子前列腺剜除术的对比研究
摘要：
目的：比较等离子前列腺电切术和等离子前列腺剜除术的保护性功能及其对尿流动力学和生活质量的影响。
方法：对于符合研究标准的40名患有良性前列腺增生的男性患者，随机分为等离子前列腺电切术组和等离子前列腺剜除术组。对于两组患者，分别记录手术时间、失血量、住院时间、手术并发症以及手术后尿流动力学和生活质量评分，并统计两组患者的保护性功能。
console什么意思结果：两组患者的手术时间、失血量和住院时间在统计学上没有明显差异。等离子前列腺电切术组的保护性功能得分略高于等离子前列腺剜除术组，但差异不显著。等离子前列腺电切术组的尿流动力学指标与等离子前列腺剜除术组相比没有差异。等离子前列腺电切术组的生活质量得分略高于等离子前列腺剜除术组，但差异不显著。
结论：对于患有良性前列腺增生的男性患者，等离子前列腺电切术和等离子前列腺剜除术的保护性功能及其对尿流动力学和生活质量的影响没有显著差异，可以根据患者特点和术者经
验选择适当的手术方式。
关键词：良性前列腺增生，等离子前列腺电切术，等离子前列腺剜除术，保护性功能，尿流动力学，生活质量
全国研究生考试成绩查询Abstract：
footfetishtubeObjective: To compare the protective function, urinary flow dynamics, and quality of life after plasma enucleation of the prostate (PEP) and plasma vaporization of the prostate (PVP).
Methods: This study randomly assigned 40 male patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to the PEP group or the PVP group. Surgical factors including operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, surgical complications, postoperative urinary flow dynamics, and quality of life scores were recorded and compared between the two groups.
新概念2Results: There was no significant difference in the surgical time, blood loss, and hospital
stay between the two groups. The protective function score of the PEP group was slightly higher than that of the PVP group, but the difference was not significant. There were no significant differences in urinary flow dynamics between the two groups, and the quality of life score of the PEP group was slightly higher, but not significantly different from that of the PVP group.
Conclusion: Both PEP and PVP had similar protective effects on urinary continence, urinary flow dynamics and quality of life for patients with BPH. The choice of the surgical approach should be bad on the patients' personal characteristics and the surgeon's experience.
Keywords: benign prostatic hyperplasia, plasma enucleation of the prostate, plasma vaporization of the prostate, protective function, urinary flow dynamics, quality of lifeheartless
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition among aging men. Various surgical approaches have been developed to treat BPH, including plasma enucleation of the prostate (PEP) and plasma vaporization of the prostate (PVP). In this study, the prote三年级英语直播课免费
ctive function of PEP and PVP on urinary continence, urinary flow dynamics and quality of life for patients with BPH was compared.
hopper
The results showed that both PEP and PVP had similar protective effects on urinary continence, urinary flow dynamics and quality of life. However, the surgical approaches differed in their technical requirements and surgical outcomes. PEP required a longer operative time and more extensive training, but had a higher tissue removal rate and more complete removal of the prostate adenoma. PVP, on the other hand, had a shorter operative time and was easier to learn, but had a higher risk of postoperative complications and a lower tissue removal rate.聆讯是什么意思
Therefore, the choice of the surgical approach should be bad on the patients' personal characteristics and the surgeon's experience. Patients with larger prostates or more vere symptoms may benefit more from PEP, while patients with smaller prostates or less vere symptoms may prefer PVP. Surgeons with more experience in PEP may also achieve better surgical outcomes with this approach.
In conclusion, PEP and PVP are both effective surgical approaches for treating BPH, and the choice of the approach should be individualized bad on the patients' needs and the surgeons' experti. Further studies are needed to compare the long-term outcomes and complications of the approachestss
In addition to PEP and PVP, there are other surgical approaches for treating BPH, including transurethral rection of the prostate (TURP), open prostatectomy, and lar enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). TURP is the gold standard of surgical treatment for BPH and has been ud for decades with proven long-term efficacy. However, TURP is associated with a higher risk of complications such as bleeding, infection, and retrograde ejaculation. Open prostatectomy is a more invasive approach that is rerved for large prostates or patients with other medical conditions that require open surgery. Lar enucleation of the prostate, such as HoLEP, is a newer technique that has shown promising outcomes in terms of efficacy and safety, but it requires specialized training and equipment.
