hm是什么意思阅读理解之观点态度题
概述
观点态度题是高考英语阅读常考的一种题型，也是考生很容易失分的一种题型。这种题型有时问作者对某事持什么态度，有时问他人对某事持什么态度。所以大家解答这类题型时，思维一定要清晰，要注意看这道题是说谁的态度，关于哪一个话题，在文章中是怎样表现的。
一、注意事项
回肠荡气1.根据文章主题句来判断。文章的中心思想与作者的观点态度是密切相关的，而文章的主题句又反映了文章的中心思想，因此，可通过文章的主题句来判断作者的观点态度。
2.注意不要将个人的好恶态度糅进题中，要学会分清作者本人的态度和作者引用观点的态度。
3.要学会根据作者语言的褒贬去判断作者的态度。注意句中带有感情色彩的副词：如wonderfully，successfully，unfortunately，doubtfully等。
4.一般来说，作者的态度不可能是漠不关心的，因此见到indifferent，uninterested通常可以排除。
wba
5.作者的态度常常在转折词后表明出来，所以见到but就要提高警惕(还有类似的yet，however，although，nevertheless等)。
6.可以通过作者所举的例子，来判断文章作者的态度倾向。作者论证某观点时，给的例子是正面的，就可以判断作者的态度是积极乐观的；如果作者的论述有好有坏，举例有正面有反面，基本可以判断作者的态度是客观的。
二、感情色彩常用词归纳
1.表示贬义的常用词：negative，critical，ambiguous，disapproving，doubtful等。
2.表示褒义的常用词：positive，support，favorable，sympathetic，helpful，cautious，enthusiastic，admiring等。
3.表示中立的常用词：indifferent，neutral，objective等。德瑞姆心理教育机构
[示例1]
Friedman points out that the green economy (经济) is a chance to keep American strength.“The ability to design，build and export green technologies for producing clean water，clean air and healthy and abundant food is going to be the currency of power in the new century.”
30.What is Friedman’s attitude towards America’s future?
A.Ambiguous. B.Doubtful. C.Hopeful. D.Tolerant.
owa
postcode分析：根据最后一段第一句“Friedman points out that the green economy (经济) is a chance to keep American strength.”可知，Friedman 认为绿色经济是使美国保持实力的一个机遇。由此可知，他对美国的未来充满了希望。故选C项。
北京烤鸭英文[示例2]
Policymakers should start thinking now about how to make sure the appearance of driverl
ess vehicles doesn’t extend the worst aspects of the car-controlled transportation system we have today.The coming technological advancement prents a chance for cities and states to develop transportation systems designed to move more people,and more affordably.The car of the future is coming.We just have to plan for it.
refund
4.What is the author’s attitude to the future of lf-driving cars?
拿下马来A.Doubtful. B.Positive. C.Disapproving. D.Sympathetic.
答案 B
解析 推理判断题。根据文章最后一句“The car of the future is coming.We just have to plan for it.”可知,作者对无人驾驶车是持积极支持的态度,故选B项。
课后练习（一）
Preparing Cities for Robot Cars
The possibility of lf-driving robot cars has often emed like a futurist’s dream,years aw
ay from materializing in the real world.Well,the future is apparently now.The California Department of Motor Vehicles began giving permits in April for companies to test truly lf-driving cars on public roads.The state also cleared the way for companies to ll or rent out lf-driving cars,and for companies to operate driverless taxi rvices.California,it should be noted,isn’t leading the way here.Companies have been testing their vehicles in cities across the country.It’s hard to predict when driverless cars will be everywhere on our roads.But however long it takes,the technology has the potential to change our transportation systems and our cities,for better or for wor,depending on how the transformation is regulated.
parcel
While much of the debate so far has been focud on the safety of driverless cars(and rightfully so),policymakers also should be talking about how lf-driving vehicles can help reduce traffic jams,cut emissions(排放) and offer more convenient,affordable mobility options.The arrival of driverless vehicles is a chance to make sure that tho vehicles are environmentally friendly and more shared.
Do we want to copy—or even worn—the traffic of today with driverless cars?Imagine a future where most adults own individual lf-driving vehicles.They tolerate long,slow journeys to and from work on packed highways becau they can work,entertain themlves or sleep on the ride,which encourages urban spread.They take their driverless car to an appointment and t the empty vehicle to circle the building to avoid paying for parking.Instead of walking a few blocks to pick up a child or the dry cleaning,they nd the lf-driving minibus.The convenience even leads fewer people to take public transport—an unwelcome side effect rearchers have already found in ride-hailing(叫车) rvices.
A study from the University of California at Davis suggested that replacing petrol-powered private cars worldwide with electric,lf-driving and shared systems could reduce carbon emissions from transportation 80% and cut the cost of transportation infrastructure(基础设施) and operations 40% by 2050.Fewer emissions and cheaper travel sound pretty appealing.The first commercially available driverless cars will almost certainly be fielded by ride-hailing rvices,considering the cost of lf-driving technology as well as liability a
nd maintenance issues(责任与维护问题).But driverless car ownership could increa as the prices drop and more people become comfortable with the technology.
Policymakers should start thinking now about how to make sure the appearance of driverless vehicles doesn’t extend the worst aspects of the car-controlled transportation system we have today.The coming technological advancement prents a chance for cities and states to develop transportation systems designed to move more people,and more affordably.The car of the future is coming.We just have to plan for it.
