chile阅读下列短文, 从给的四个选项 (A、B、C和D) 中, 选出最佳选项。 六级估分器
antares
The question of what children learn, and how they should learn, is continually being debated and redebated. Nobody dares any longer to defend the old system, the learning of lessons parrot-fashion, the grammar-with-a-whip system, which was good enough for our grandparents. The theories of modem psychology have stepped in to argue that we must understand the need of children. Children are not just small adults; they are children who must be respected as much.如何美白脸部
在线翻译文章>穿越火线的英文
Well, you may say, this is as it should be, a good idea. But think further. What happens? "Education" becomes the responsibility not of teachers, but of psychologists (心里学家当我想起你 张学友). What happens then? Teachers worry too much about the psychological implications (示意posted) of their lessons, and forget about the subjects themlves. If a child dislikes a lesson, the teacher feels that it is his fault, not the child’s. So teachers worry whether history is "relevant" to modern young children. And do they dare to recount stories about violence? Or will this make the children themlves violent? Can they tell their class about children
of different races, or will this encourage racial hatred? Why teach children to write grammatical ntences? Verbal expression is better. Sums? Arithmetic? No: Real-life mathematical situations are more understandable.
英文合同范本>学习化妆培训
