考研英语真题阅读理解试题及名师解析(24)
modem是什么意思考研英语真题阅读理解试题及名师解析(24)
Do you remember all tho years when scientists argued that smoking would kill us but the doubters insisted that we didn’t know for sure? That the evidence was inconclusive, the science uncertain? That the antismoking lobby was out to destroy our way of life and the government should stay out of the way? Lots of Americans bought that nonn, and over three decades, some 10 million smokers went to early graves。
There are uptting parallels today, as scientists in one wave after another try to awaken us to the growing threat of global warming. The latest was a panel from the National Academy of Sciences, enlisted by the White Hou, to tell us that the Earth’s atmosphere is definitely warming and that the problem is largely man-made. The clear message is that we should get moving to protest ourlves. The president of the National Academy, Bruce Alberts, added
this key point in the preface to the panel’s report: “Science never has all the answers。” But science d oes provide us with the best available guide to the future, and it is critical that our nation and the world ba important policies on the best judgments that science can provide concerning the future conqu
tweak
ences of prent actions。
Just as on smoking, voices now e from many quarters insisting that the science about global warming is inplete, that it’s OK to keep pouring fumes into the air until we know for sure. This is a dangerous game: by the time 100 percent of the evidence is in, it may be too late. With the risks obvious and growing, a prudent people would take out an insurance policy now。
Fortunately, the White Hou is starting to pay attention. But it’s obvious that a majority of the president’s advirs still don’t take global warming riously. Instead of a plan of action, they continue to press for more rearch—a classic ca of “paralysis by analysis。”
To rve as responsible stewards of the pla, we must press forward on deeper atmospheric and oceanic rearch. But rearch alone is inadequ ate. If the Administration won’t take the legislative initiative, Congress should help to begin fashioning conrvation measures. A bill by Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, which would offer financial incentives for private industry, is a promising start. Many e that the country is getting ready to build lots of new power plants to meet our energy needs. If we are ever going to protect the atmosphere, it is crucial that tho new plants be environmentally sound。26. An argument made by supporters of smoking was that
[A] there was no scientific evidence of the correlation between smoking and death。
[B] the number of early deaths of smokers in the past decades was insignificant。
[C] people had the freedom to choo their own way of life。
[D] antismoking people were usually talking nonn。
27. Aording to Bruce Alberts, science can rve as
[A] a protector。
[B] a judge。
[C] a critic。
[D] a guide。
28. What does the author mean by “paralysis by analysis” (Last line, Paragraph 4)？
哥伦比亚自行车
ko是什么意思[A] Endless studies kill action。
[B] Careful investigation reveals truth。
[C] Prudent planning hinders progress。
[D] Extensive rearch helps decision-making。
29. Aording to the author, what should the Administration do about global warming?
[A] Offer aid to build cleaner power plants。
[B] Rai public awareness of conrvation。
[C] Press for further scientific rearch。
[D] Take some legislative measures。
30. The author associates the issue of global warming with that of smoking becaucolumnist
[A] they bot h suffered from the government’s negligence。
[B] a lesson from the latter is applicable to the former。
[C] the oute of the latter aggravates the former。
polygon[D] both of them have turned from bad to wor。
名师解析
26. An argument made by supporters of smoking was that
吸烟的支持者提出的观点是
[A] there was no scientific evidence of the correlation between smoking and death。
没有科学证据证明吸烟和死亡之间存在相互联系。
[B] the number of early deaths of smokers in the past decades was insignificant。
在过去的几十年中过早死亡的吸烟者人数不多。
[C] people had the freedom to choo their own way of life。
人们有选择自己生活方式的自由。
[D] antismoking people were usually talking nonn。
反对吸烟的人通常一派胡言。
【答案】 Cignoreca
【考点】事实细节题。
【分析】从第一段可以看出，其实支持吸烟的人的理由不止一个，比方证据不够充分，科学也不能确定，反对吸烟的游说是为了毁掉我们的生活方式等等。[A]选项是出题人成心扩大范围，夸大选项，
成心绝对化，原文只是证据缺乏，而不是没有证据。[B]选项说死亡人数不多，而原文提到的“1,000万”可不是小数字。[D]选项不符合的原因是作者说支持吸烟的人的话是“nonn”(一派胡言)，而不是反对吸烟的人的话。
27. Aording to Bruce Alberts, science can rve as
根据布鲁斯·阿尔伯特的观点，科学能充当
[A] a protector. 保护人。 [B] a judge. 评判人、法官。
[C] a critic. 批评者。 [D] a guide. 向导。
【答案】 D
【考点】事实细节题。
eoa【分析】文章第二段第四句中有这样的话“科学从来都不能够提供所有的答案，但是科学却能够为我们提供通向未来的最正确引导”。
28. What does the author mean by “paralysis by analysis” (Last line, Paragraph 4)？
作者通过“分析性瘫痪症”(第四段最后一行)表达什么意思？
[A] Endless studies kill action. 无穷尽的研究遏制了行动。财政学就业方向
[B] Careful investigation reveals truth. 详细的研究提醒了真理。
[C] Prudent planning hinders. 慎重的方案阻碍了进展。
[D] Extensive rearch helps decision-making. 广泛的研究帮助决策。
阿黛尔新歌【答案】 A
【考点】上下文暗示题。
