行为金融学课后答案1至5章anawer

更新时间:2023-05-09 02:15:15 阅读: 评论:0

第一章
1. Differentiate the following terms/concepts:
a.Prospect and probability distribution
A prospect is a lottery or ries of wealth outcomes, each of which is associated with a probability, whereas a probability distribution defines the likelihood of possible outcomes.
b.Risk and uncertainty
Risk is measurable using probability, but uncertainty is not.  Uncertainty is when probabilities can’t be assigned or the possible outcomes are unclear.
c.Utility function and expected utility
A utility function, denoted as u( ), assigns numbers to possible outcomes so that preferred choices receive higher numbers.  Utility can be thought of as the satisfaction received from a particular outcome. 
d.Risk aversion, risk eking, and risk neutrality
Risk aversion describes someone who prefers the expected value of a lottery to the lottery itlf.  Risk eking describes someone who prefers a lottery to the expected value of a lottery.  And risk neutrality describes someone who utility of the expected value of a lottery is equal to the expected utility of the lottery.
2.  When eating out, Rory prefers spaghetti over a hamburger.  Last night she had a choice of spaghetti and macaroni and chee and decided on the spaghetti again.  The night before, Rory had a choice between spaghetti, pizza, and a hamburger and this time she had pizza.  Then, today she cho macaroni and chee over a hamburger.  Does her lection today indicate that Rory’s choices are consistent with economic rationality?  Why or why not?
Rory’s preferences are consistent with rationality.  They are complete and transitive.  We e that her preference ordering is:
Pizza spaghetti macaroni and chee hamburger
3. Consider a person with the following utility function over wealth: u(w) = ew, where e is the exponential function (approximately equal to 2.7183) and w = wealth in hundreds of thousands of dollars.  Suppo that this person has a 40% chance of wealth of $50,000 and a 60% chance of wealth of $1,000,000 as summarized by P(0.40, $50,000, $1,000,000).
a. What is the expected value of wealth?
E(w) = .4 * .5 + .6 * 10 = 6.2
U(P) = .4e0.50 + .6e10 = 13,216.54
b. Construct a graph of this utility function.
The function is convex.
c. Is this person risk aver, risk neutral, or a risk eker?
Risk eker becau graph is convex.
d. What is this person’s certainty equivalent for the prospect?
ew = 13,216.54  gives w = 9.4892244 or $948,922.44
4. An individual has the following utility function: u(w) = w.5 where w = wealth.
a. Using expected utility, order the following prospects in terms of preference, from the most to the least preferred:
P1(.8, 1,000, 600)
P2(.7, 1,200, 600)
P3(.5, 2,000, 300)
Ranking: P2, P3, P1 with expected utilities 31.5972, 31.0209, and 30.1972 for prospects 2, 3, and 1, respectively
b. What is the certainty equivalent for prospect P2?
998.3830
c. Without doing any calculations, would the certainty equivalent for prospect P1 be larger or smaller?  Why?
The certainty equivalent for P1 would be smaller becau P2 is ranked higher than P1.
5. Consider two prospects:
    Problem 1: Choo between
        Prospect A:        $2,500 with probability .33,
                    $2,400 with probability .66,
                    Zero with probability .01.
        And Prospect B:    $2,400 with certainty.
    Problem 2: Choo between
        Prospect C:        $2,500 with probability .33,
                    Zero with probability .67.
        And Prospect D:    $2,400 with probability .34,
                    Zero with probability .66.
It has been shown by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (1979, “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk,” Econometrica 47(2), 263-291) that more people choo B when prented with problem 1 and when prented with problem 2, most people choo C.  The choices violate expected utility theory.  Why?
This is an example of the Allais paradox.  The first choice suggests that
u(2,400) > .33u(2,500) + .66u(2,400) or .34u(2,400) > .33 u(2,500)
while the cond choice suggests just the opposite inequality.
第二章
1. Differentiate the following terms/concepts:
a. Systematic and nonsystematic risk
Nondiversifiable or systematic risk is risk that is common to all risky asts in the system and cannot be diversified.  Diversifiable or unsystematic risk is specific to the ast in question and can be diversified.
b. Beta and standard deviation
Beta is the CAPM’s measure of risk.  It takes into account an ast’s nsitivity to the market and only measures systematic, nondiversifiable risk.  The standard deviation is a measure of dispersion that includes both diversifiable and nondiversifiable risks.
c. Direct and indirect agency costs

本文发布于:2023-05-09 02:15:15,感谢您对本站的认可!

本文链接:https://www.wtabcd.cn/fanwen/fan/78/560907.html

版权声明:本站内容均来自互联网,仅供演示用,请勿用于商业和其他非法用途。如果侵犯了您的权益请与我们联系,我们将在24小时内删除。

标签:
相关文章
留言与评论(共有 0 条评论)
   
验证码:
推荐文章
排行榜
Copyright ©2019-2022 Comsenz Inc.Powered by © 专利检索| 网站地图