Cambridge11
TEST1
Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
话题和题型分类
政府类、同意不同意类型
dettol题目分析
轨道交通VS道路交通
满分范文赏析
美女翻译张京More often than not, “getting somewhere” is ud metaphorically to mean “getting what one wants”, but in the context of ever-expanding cities and over-crowded traffic condition
s, the term has come to mean a headache for commuters and governments alike. Thus, the choice between “roads or railways” has come to the attention of authorities, and this essay believes that the utilization of public transport, exemplified by railways, should be encouraged whenever possible.
recruits | 内容 | 详细条目 |
段落 | 此段结构 | 1 引出话题 2 阐述个人观点 |
此段功能 | 首段开篇摆明观点: 无论如何轨道交通都应该被鼓励 |
| | |
Obviously, the less traffic there is on the roads, the more efficient transportation operates, and the less polluted the environment is. Even though one can dispute that the road system was planned decades ago, and was not meant for the increasing volume of vehicles as a sign of life improvement, it is just becau private vehicle ownership is prevalent, and road system cannot be bettered at will, that public transport, i.e. railways designed to carry a multitude of pasngers and transport them at a high speed, should b
e encouraged. Conquently, with less road traffic, exhaust emissions will be dramatically reduced, and a cleaner environment is readily at hand.
学费英文 | 内容 | 详细条目 |
段落 | 此段结构 | 1 反面论据一：道路交通会污染环境，也会造成交通拥堵 |
此段功能 | 本段是文章第二段，说了道路交通的缺点 |
| | |
However, the term “whenever possible” in the opening paragraph does carry some weight. For newly developed regions, especially tho with a small or slow increa in population and traffic in the foreeable future, roads can be a more pragmatic medium of transport when compared with railroads, underground or not, which are considerably more expensive and less adaptable.
| 内容 | 详细条目 |
段落 | 此段结构 | 1 让步说明轨道交通有些情况下也不适用 |
此段功能 | 本段是文章第三段， 转折让步引出特殊的情况 |
| | |
Railways, for their pasnger capacity and speediness, are no doubt a more nsible solution to congested traffic and pollution problems than roads.
| 内容 | 详细条目 |
段落 | 此段结构 | 总结全文 国家建造师网 |
此段功能 | 强调观点，重述了轨道交通的好处 |
| | 万宝路的意思 |
满分要素剖析：
一、语言表达
本文多采用复杂的句式，多采用连词，副词thus、however、obviously、conquently似文章结构更加紧密，句式更加新颖，全文观点明确，内容紧凑。
1. Obviously, the less traffic there is on the roads, the more efficient transportation operates, and the less polluted the environment is.
the…, the…, the 加上比较级结构，表示越……就越……，一种很好用来表示两者正向或者
反向变化的句式。
2. For newly developed regions, especially tho with a small or slow increa in population and traffic in the foreeable future, roads can be a more pragmatic medium of transport when compared with railroads, underground or not, which are considerably more expensive and less adaptable. weight.
compared with比较起……，通常用来作对比
二、逻辑结构
本文采用总分总的结构，先表明自己的观点，然后第二段从侧面论证自己的观点，第三段让步转折，最后在结尾处重申观点。
练一练
根据以下思路亲自练习写一篇作文
写作提示：
A．轨道交通
速度快
更加环保
更加安全
B．道路交通
更加方便
更加享受，私家车环境更好
Test2
Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increa recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
话题和题型分类
政府类、个人观点
题目分析
立法有效Or靠个人
满分范文赏析
The environment is what all livelihoods depend on, so all participants should have a fair share of work in sustaining it. Humans, for the advantages they have taken from nature and the harm they have conquently done, should chip in with willing actions no matter whether their contributions are legally bound or not.
| 内容 | 详细条目 |
段落 | 此段结构 | 1 描述现实 2 引出观点：立法并不是唯一的解决办法 |
此段功能 | 首段开篇引出观点 |
| | |
Admittedly, citizens will no doubt try harder to recycle in the face of laws and corresponding punishment. Even though recycling is a crucial and integral part of environmental protection, people, for the trouble or other concerns, are better at words than deeds. In light of an unidealistic reality, laws and binding regulations should be in place before it is too late.
| 内容 | 详细条目 |
段落 | nun此段结构 | 让步说明政府立法的有效性 |
此段功能 | chang本段是文章第二段，表明政府立法的有效。 |
| | |
However, individuals are ultimately responsible for recycling. For one, daily wastes constitutes one third of the pollution on earth. It is only reasonable to demand that everybody “be a man of action” and “clean up their own mess”. For another, recycling is not a burden to be pasd from one individual to another, considering the welfare of everybody on earth is at stake.
| 内容 | 详细条目 |
新冠肺炎英文名修订为covid 19段落 | 此段结构 | 个人应做到回收利用，否则地球会陷入险境。 |
此段功能 | 本段是文章第三段，转折，表明个人更应该行动起来。 |
| | |
Additionally, instead of laws, incentives might be more feasible and effective. A mechanism of recycling can be created on the government’s part: tax cuts or reimburment for the delivery of bulky waste to designated locations, the construction of more collection spots, or promotional campaigns highlighting the importance of recycling.
| 内容 | 详细条目 |
段落 | 此段结构 | 奖励也会是很高效的鼓励回收利用的方法 |
此段功能 | 本段是文章第四段，补充说明对于另一个政府可以做的鼓励回收利用的事情。 |
| | |
cell phone
In sum, laws will help to recycle waste, but not as much as incentives from the government could, and the cau will only be advanced when everybody is in it together.
| 内容 | 详细条目 |
段落 | 此段结构 | 全文总结 |
此段功能 | 提炼自己的观点：立法可能有帮助，但是只有每个人都参与，齐心协力才会真的有效。 |
| | |
满分要素剖析：
一、 语言表达
本文结构清晰，思维缜密，词汇句法的运用流畅自如，非常完整有逻辑地表达了作者观点。
1. Humans, for the advantages they have taken from nature and the harm they have conquently done, should chip in with willing actions no matter whether their contributions are legally bound or not.
