考研英语（阅读）-试卷53
(总分70,考试时间90分钟)
2. Reading Comprehension
Section II Reading Comprehension
Part ADirections: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D.
When one of his employees phoned in sick last year, Scott McDonald, CEO of Monument Security in Sacramento, California,, decided to investigate. He had already informed his staff of 400 curity guards and patrol drivers that he was installing Xora, a software program that tracks workers" whereabouts through GPS technology on **pany cell phones. A Web-bad "geo-fence" aroundwork territories would alert the boss if workers strayed or even drove too fast. It also enabled him to route workers more efficiently. So when McDonald logged on, the program told him exactly where his worker was—and it wasn"t in
bed with the sniffles. "**e you"re eastbound on 80 heading to Reno right now if you"re sick?" asked the boss. There was a long silence—the sound of a job ending— followed by, "You got me." Learn that truth, and learn it well: what you do at work is the boss"s business. Xora is just one of the new technologies from a host of companies that have sprung up in the past two years peddling products and rvices—software, GPS, video and phone surveillance, even investigators—that let managers get to know you really well. "Virtually nothing you do at work on a computer can"t be monitored," says Jeremy Gruber, legal director of the National Workrights Institute, which advocates workplace privacy. Nine out of 10 employers obrve your electronic behavior, according to the Center for Business Ethics at Bentley College. A study by the American Management Association and the ePolicy Institute found 76% of employers watch you surf the Web and 36% track content, keystrokes and time spent at the keyboard. You can"t really **panies for watching our Web habits, since 45% of us admit that surfing is our favorite time waster, according to a joint survey by and AOL. A Northeast **pany found that veral employees who **plained of overwork spent all day on . Business argue that t
heir snooping is justified. Not only are they trying to guard trade crets and intellectual property, but they also must ensure that **ply with government regulations, such as keeping medical records and credit-card numbers private. **panies are liable for allowing a hostile work environment—say, one filled with porn-**puter screens—that may lead to lawsuits. "People write very looly with their e-mails, but they can unintentionally reach thousands, like posters throughout a work site," says Charles Spearman of diversity-management consultants Tucker Spearman & Associates. "In an investigation, that e-mail can be one of the most persuasive pieces of evidence."
1. Scott McDonald fired one of his employees becau the employee
A. didn"t accomplish his job well.清华少儿英语教材
B. drove too fast.
C. covered up his illness.
D. cheated when he asked for leave.
2. Xora is a software program ud to
A. improve management experti of administrators.
B. familiarize people with the investigated person.
C. pinpoint people"s location and whereabouts.
D. combat GPS in surveillance technology.
3. The study by the American Management Association showed that
A. information on a **puter is not confidential.
北京会计培训B. people should try to prevent themlves from being spied.
C. **puters at work might po a threat to privacy.
D. employees should stop their electronic behavior unrelated to work.
4. The word "snooping" (line 1, Paragraph 5) most probably means
A. scrambling. B. mquiring.
mosso简 爱C. invading. D. rearching.
蜕变的英文
5. What can we infer from the last paragraph?
A. Business snooping is reasonable and should be promoted.
B. Employers are in favor of the idea of business snooping.
category是什么意思C. Upgraded surveillance can help guard against legal charges.
D. Privacy can be always revealed to the public as evidence.
The Gowanus Canal in Brooklyn is notoriously toxic. Since 1869, the mile-long waterway has been a dumping ground for garbage, industrial waste, guns and body parts—its waters once too dirty to arch. Today you can still stand on a bridge over the canal and e underwear floating on the water. The odor, once almost unbearable, has softened into an occasional summerstink, thanks to a flushing tunnel installed 10 years ago. A gro
wing number of artists and young people have moved into the industrial lofts and row hous nearby. Some of the most oblivious have been spotted on the canal in canoes, their paddles stirring 140 years worth of detritus (small pieces of rubbish) from leather factories, chemical plants and more. Now, the Gowanus pioneers want somebody to finally detoxify their hazardous neighborhood. They imagine it as Brooklyn"s little Venice, although a bit cleaner. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering naming the Gowanus an official Superfund site. That would bring in a slow but steady federal cleanup with money and the legal influence to force polluters to help pay. The prent Mayor of the New York City also wants a cleaner Gowanus, but he wants to do it his way. At a community board meeting Tuesday night, about 200 people listened as the mayor"s experts argued against a Superfund listing. It was a hard crowd to move. Many wore a button that said it all: "Gowanus Canal: Superfund Me." The mayor and his team are particularly worried about how a Superfund site would affect the real estate market, especially a few possibilities for larger developments in the area. Instead of being "stigmatized" by the Superfund label, as they put it, they favor the "Superfund Alternative"
plan. Although there are few details at this point, that effort would be run by the city and overen by the EPA Every year, the city would rush to collect funds from the Corps of Engineers and other agencies to help clean up the area to the EPA"s satisfaction. The city could only plead with polluters to help pay. With so many pollutants and so many polluters, this looks like a job for Superfund. Brooklyn can handle the label. Residents already enjoy boasting about their survival or joking about living near the canal"s dark humors. Why el have a popular bar called the Gowanus Yacht Club? They just want the cleanup done and done right.
intact是什么意思
6. In the opening paragraph, the author introduces his topic by
A. prenting an assumption.
B. narrating a story.
C. depicting a phenomenon.
D. making a comparison.
7. The phra "Some of the most oblivious" (Line 3, Paragraph 2) here means
A. people who randomly pollute the canal.什么意思英文
B. people who care little about the odor.
C. people who try to neglect the smell.
D. people who wish to clean the canal.
8. The EPA"s proposal of listing the Gowanus an official Superfund site will
A. bring in efficient and continuous cleanup on Gowanus Canal.
B. rai fund from the federal government, the New York City and the polluters.
C. turn **munity into a cleaner, larger and healthier ttlement.
D. be cheerfully welcomed by the current residents in **munity.
9. The prent New York mayor would be most likely to agree that
A. the treatment of Gowanus Canal shouldn"t hamper future development.
B. the city should shoulder more responsibilities rather than the federation.
C. it"s unnecessary to resort to the federation for financial support.
D. it"s more proper to plead with polluters to help pay.
10. The bar-name "Gowanus Yacht Club" express汽车安全驾驶
A. local residents" wishes for the future development.
B. local residents" yearning for cleanup on Gowanus Canal.
混血儿英语C. Gowanus pioneers" resolution to clean the canal.
D. Gowauns pioneers" rentment towards the mayor.
The quest for wisdom is as old as Socrates, but it"s also an up-to-the-minute economic indicator. A contrarian one: when things are going well, you don"t have to go arching fo
r wisdom. It streams nonstop over CNBC, its avatars sit atop the Forbes list of billionaires and each day it proves again the eternal truthsof the free market.Then in duecourthingsgo to hell;theelites humbly confess their ignorance to Congress or a grand jury, and the arch for new patterns begins. Tellingly, scholars date the modern scientific study of wisdom to the work of the American psychologist Vivian Clayton in the malai-ridden 1970s. Clayton devid the first empirical tests for wisdom, which she defined as the ability to acquire knowledge and analyze it both logically and emotionally—picking up on the work begun by Socrates. So it"s no coincidence that veral dozen rearchers in fields ranging from neuroscience to art, music and law have just received wisdom-eking grants under the auspices of the University of Chicago. The $2.7 million program, funded by the Templeton Foundation, is called Defining Wisdom, a name that implies the rearchers will know what they were looking for once they find it. Wisdom, according to Robert J. Sternberg of Tufts University, the author of veral books on the topic, is still an obscure field with minimal academic cachet. With so much at stake, the program"s directors, psychologists John Cacioppo and Howard Nusbaum, dismisd the
traditional approach to wisdom rearch; rather they cast their nets wide and deep into the pools of academy. The 38 proposals they approved include ones aimed at finding wisdom in computer operations and in classical literature. Starting at the beginning, one scholar obrves that "language is the medium by which wisdom-related knowledge is usually conveyed." That sounds lf-evident, but another scientist propos to "explore music as a form of wisdom." "We are trying to think out of the box," says Nusbaum. Cacioppo and Nusbaum dismiss arguments about the inherent circularity of arching for wisdom at the same time as defining it. But they have some preconceptions about what they expect to find. They e "wisdom" in part as a corrective to the "rational choice" pattern of decision making, the foundation of free-market economics. Rational choice holds that everyone"s happiness is best rved when people maximize their short-term individual gains, even at the expen of the broad interests of society or the long-term future. That is precily opposite the approach of, for example, ants, which are entirely indifferent to their individual fates and don"t, as a rule, over-expand out of reckless greed.
