审稿意见怎么写
一般审稿意见至少要包含三条：
（1）简要描述论文的研究内容和意义，并作出评价。对于其比较好的部分，要给于肯定。
（2）针对文章中的内容和结果，指出其具体的不足之处，并谈谈你的看法。文章的不足之处有三种层次：第一，论文结果不正确或有重大失误；第二，论文缺乏重要的结果；第三，论文的结果不够完善。
（3）最后，给出你的综合评价，接受，修改，还是拒收。
英文论文审稿意见汇总
以下关于英文投稿过程中编辑给出的意见,与大家一起分享。12点无轻重主次之分。每一点内容由总结性标题和代表性审稿人意见构成。
1、目标和结果不清晰。
It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with experti in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and ntence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.
2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。
◆ In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical me
thods ud in the study.
◆ Furthermore, an explanation of why the authors did the various experiments
should be provided.
3、对于研究设计的rationale:
Also, there are few explanations of the rationale for the study design.
4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：
man in the mirror歌词
harbinger
The conclusions are overstated. For example, the study did not show
if the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.
steve young5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：
A hypothesis needs to be prented。
6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：
What was the rationale for the film/SBF volume ratio?
7、对研究问题的定义：
Try to t the problem discusd in this paper in more clear,
write one ction to define the problem
8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review:
The topic is novel but the application propod is not so novel.
9、对claim,如A＞B的证明，verification:
There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improvement on previous work.
六级英语成绩查询10、严谨度问题：
MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.
11、格式（重视程度）：
◆ In addition, the list of references is not in our style. It is clo but not completely correct. I have attached a pdf file with "Instructions for Authors" which shows examples.
◆ Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are unsure, plea consult the formatting nstructions to authors that are given under the "Instructions and Forms" button in he upper right-hand corner of the screen.
12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：
有关语言的审稿人意见：
◆ It is noted that your manuscript needs careful editing by someone with experti in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and ntence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.
bedding◆ The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper translation/reviewing rvice before submission; only then can a proper review be performed. Most ntences contain grammatical and/or spelling mistakes or are not complete ntences.
jtl
◆ As prented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are pro
blems with ntence structure, verb ten, and clau construction.
◆ The English of your manuscript must be improved before resubmission. We str学习视频
ongly suggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is well-verd i
n English or who native language is English.
比较级
◆ Plea have someone competent in the English language and the subject matte
r of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?
◆ the quality of English needs improving.
来自编辑的鼓励：
Encouragement from reviewers:
◆ I would be very glad to re-review the paper in greater depth once it has be
en edited becau the subject is interesting.
◆ There is continued interest in your manuscript titled "……" which you subm
山冈的读音
itted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Rearch: Part B - Applied Biomat
erials.
alas
◆ The Submission has been greatly improved and is worthy of publication.
