GRE北美满分作文赏析[1]
2016年GRE北美满分作文范文赏析[1]
导语：下面是小编整理的GRE北美满分作文，供您参考学习，希望能带给您帮助。
The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:
"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increas, the wages paid to employees should also increa. Hence it makes financial n for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expens and save money."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the u of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument w
ould make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
fat的比较级yukuo
GRE写作范文：
大连外语培训GRE首段common files是什么
goolg
This argument states that it makes financial n for employers to make the workplace safer becau by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is bad on the premi that as the list of physical injury increas, the wages paid to employees should also increa. However, there are veral assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the incread payroll expens due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, becau most companies agree that as the risk of injury increas so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work envir
翻译 英文
onments agree.
peoplesoftGRE中间段1
The first issue to be addresd is whether incread labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly incread wages than it would not make n to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expens of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial n to simply pay the incread wages. No business or business owner with any n would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to the decisions making financial n, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical n.
GRE中间段2
This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely u financial n in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the ca. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment becau while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itlf on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.
GRE中间段3
Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the ca of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety pr
ecautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.
shallwegoGRE末端
In conclusion, while at first it may em to make financial n to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial n. Furthermore, financial n may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analys must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。， coal mine)。 Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expens.
如何增进夫妻感情>生产商英文
