高考题型重组练(十二)
Ⅰ.阅读理解
A
[2019·长春市质量监测二] My wife and I were at a crowded grocery store not long ago. It was a weekday evening, cold and wet — and ten. People were carelessly blocking aisles, complaining and cutting one another off with their carts.
Things got wor at the checkout line. The cashier scanned a man's discount card, but he misread the savings on her screen as an additional charge. He decided she was acting deliberately and began to argue.
“植树节英文She is being spiteful (恶意的)！” he yelled. “This is unbelievable.”
Other customers looked away as the cashier tried to reason with him. She called a manager, who accompanied the man to customer rvice. Shaken, she moved to the next c
ustomer in line.
We've all witnesd uncomfortable scenes like this in public places. The grocery scene was another example of how our trust in others has eroded. But it was also a teachable moment on how we can rebuild our faith — starting with just one person.
Back at the grocery store, my wife and I reached our uneasy cashier. I grabbed a bottle of water from a nearby cooler and handed it to her. “We felt bad about how that man treated you and wanted to buy this for you，” I said. Her face lit up, and we talked as she scanned our items. She told us she had been working that evening through vere foot pain and would be having surgery later that week. We wished her well in her recovery, and she thanked us as we left.
Tho are the balancing acts, the moments of responding social and emotional pain with healing, which will add up to restore trust among people. You can start that pattern in someone el's life, even in a place as ordinary as the neighborhood grocery store.顽石
体裁：夹叙夹议 题材：个人经历 主题：人与人之间信任感的缺失和重建
【语篇解读】 本文记叙了作者和妻子在一个杂货店中遇到了一位男士与收银员争吵，从而发觉人与人之间缺乏信任，而作者和妻子买水安慰收银员，以期重新建立人与人之间的信任。
1．Why did the man at the checkout line argue with the cashier?
A．The cashier called a manager to help her.
全国一卷数学B．Someone jumped the queue waiting to check out.
C．There was something wrong with his discount card.
D．He believed the cashier charged him more on purpo.
答案与解析：D 考查细节理解。根据第二段中的“but he misread the savings on her screen as an additional charge. He decided she was acting deliberately and began to argue.”可知，他误把省下来的钱当成了额外的收费，他认为收银员是故意的，并和她吵了起来。也就是说，他认为收银员是故意多收他的钱。故选D项。axx
2．Which of the following words can replace the underlined word “eroded” in Paragraph 5?
A．Changed. B．Incread.
C．Faded. D．均码Formed.
答案与解析：C 考查词义猜测。根据第五段中的“We've all witnesd uncomfortable scenes like this in public places. The grocery scene was another example of how our trust in others has eroded.”可知，我们都在公共场所目睹过这些不愉快的场面。而这些不愉快也说明了人与人之间缺乏信任，即彼此之间的信任削弱了。因此，erode与fade同义，意为“逐渐削弱；消失”。故选C项。
feeling什么意思
3．Why did the author buy a bottle of water for the cashier?
A．He thought the cashier might feel a little bit thirsty.英语论坛
B．He knew she had gone through much trouble recently.
C．He wanted to restore the trust between her and the man.
D．He wanted to comfort her after the terrible experience just now.
答案与解析：D 考查推理判断。根据倒数第二段中的英文职位大全“We felt bad about how that man treated you and wanted to buy this for you”可知，作者和妻子对于那个男人对待收银员的方式感到难过，因此给收银员买了一瓶水。由此可知，他们是想要安慰收银员。故选D项。
4．What is the last paragraph intended to do?
A．Add a warning.
B．Make a suggestion.
C．Introduce a topic.
D．Prent an argument.
答案与解析：B 考查推理判断。作者在最后一段呼吁人们行动起来，增强人与人之间的信任。因此，最后一段是作者对读者的建议。故选B项。
B
[2019·南昌二模] Robots are now being employed not just for dangerous tasks, such as discovering mines or rescuing people in disasters. They are also finding applications as houhold help and as nursing assistants. As increasing numbers of machines, equipped with the latest artificial intelligence, take on a growing variety of specialized and everyday tasks, the question of how people e them and behave towards them becomes ever more urgent.
A team led by Sari Nijsn of Radboud University and Markus Paulus, Professor of Developmental Psychology at LudwigMaximiliansUniversitat (LMU), have carried out a study to determine the degree to which people show concern for robots and behave towards them bad on moral principles.
建军节用英语怎么说
According to Sari Nijsn, the study t out to answer the following question: “Under what circumstances would adults be willing to sacrifice robots to save human lives？” The participants were faced with a hypothetical (假设的) moral dilemma: Would they be prepared to put a single person at risk in order to save a group of injured persons? In the situations prented the intended victim was either a human, a humanoid robot that had been humanized to various degrees or a robot that was clearly recognizable as a machine.
>wicked公司
