I
wdlANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN FY 2005WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION
FY 2005 Annual Performance Plan W estern’s FY 2005 Annual Performance Plan outlines key measures and targets for asssing how well we accom-
plish our mission of marketing and delivering Federal hydropower. We developed this plan using guidance from the Gov-ernment Performance and Results Act. The measures and targets are bad on national, Federal and regional operating criteria and industry standards for power system reliability, safety and investment repayment. By developing and identifying program performance measures and targets, Western managers are able to cloly moni-tor and asss program performance, take action to maximize the effectiveness and efficiency of activities, and produce desired results. Through the measures and targets, Western, in turn, contributes to the Department of Energy’s goal of fostering a diver supply of reliable, affordable and environmentally sound energy.
Aligning Budget and Performance
GPRA’s goal is to promote more effective management of program performance in government by linki
ng budget dollars to program performance and results—in short, performance-bad budgeting. The Budget and Performance Integration initiative in the President’s Management Agenda, and the Office of Management and Budget’s Program Asssment Rating Tool further underscore this link. Ac-cordingly, beginning with this FY 2005 Annual Performance Plan, Western’s performance measures and targets parallel tho included in the annual budget request, the Department’s performance mea-surement tracking system, and other GPRA documents outlining our program.
1
FY 2005 Performance Plan
rotaryPower System Reliability: With more than 17,000 miles of high-voltage transmission lines spanning most of the western half of
the United States, Western markets approximately 40 billion kilowatthours of Federal hydropower annually to more than 680 wholesale utility customers. This hydroelectric resource is an important component of our customers’ energy mix. They rely on this power for residential, commercial, agricultural and municipal us. Uninterrupted delivery of power is a key result for Western.
october
Performance Measure: North American Electric Reliability Council CPS 1 and 2 ratings. The control area performance standards measure power system error frequency, or Western’s ability to match generation to load and magnitude of unscheduled power flows.
FY 2005 Target: Meet or exceed NERC standards for control
areas.
C PS 1 is a statistical measure of area control error variabil-
ity and its relationship to frequency error. The minimum
level of compliance is 100 percent; the maximum is 200
percent.
CPS1 Performance History
Western Average Industry Average
FY 2000199.40173.91
FY 2001186.93168.57
FY 2002185.66172.95
FY 2003185.61169.07
结论的意思FY 2004184.01165.11
2
stringsC PS 2 is a statistical measure designed to limit unaccept-
ably large unscheduled power flows. The minimum level of compliance is 90 percent; the maximum is 100 percent.
CPS2 Performance Historycocks
Western Average Industry Average FY 200098.2896.22
FY 200198.4895.65
FY 200298.5196.29
FY 200398.0996.49
FY 200498.3096.66
tribeca
Performance Measure: Accountable transmission system outages. This measure quantifies the efficiency of Western’s efforts to reduce/eliminate avoidable outages (tho caud by human er-ror through improper or incorrect equipment operation, installa-tion or maintenance).
FY 2005 Target: Total FY 2005 outages will not exceed the av-erage number of outages for the past five years (average of 23).
Outage Performance History
Target Actual
FY 2000≤ 3430
iswearFY 2001≤ 2731
arc welderFY 2002≤ 2617
FY 2003≤ 2113
FY 2004≤ 2621
utmostFY 2005≤ 23
3
