基因工程的优缺点英语作文易贝乐
Human gene field has made great progress, and through genetic engineering in order to offer rvice to change the nature of need progression. But, in a very long period of time, to the philosophy of human genetic engineering ethics problems enough attention. Cloning technology to the human genome from since the great discovery, a growing problem, and compared with this process, human corresponding social ethics system is not established.
颁发的意思Genetic ethics is its contents include the look, but there are two aspects; one is ecological ethics, on the one hand, is the social ethics. Would gene for ecological ethics, mainly to regulate and coordination of genetic engineering and the contradiction between the ecological environment; Just as the social ethics, gene is mainly to regulate and coordinate gene engineering and social or ethical problem. The establishment and development of genetic ethics not only won't hinder development of natural science, it will further enhance our understanding of the nature of science, will also help us to the truth, laws, causality new understanding.
Ecological ethics for plant genetic rearch work of norms and reasonable constraint, mostly for biodiversity consideration. In recent years, the plant gene rearch made rapid progress, the advances drive a ries of the agricultural revolution, and especially in food revolution oriented. However, this to plant gene optimization bad revolution, has led to the destruction of the species diversity. For example, it makes people eat food from 5000 kinds of shrunk to 150. A similar is for increasing production and shorten, fertilizer played a pivotal role in growth, but also caud the soil harden and surface damage. The same situation also happens in the rearch and application of animal genes. For example, tube cows and sheep for people to control tube biological gender provides the basis for this technology for possible human biological of population control. On a particular populations, male quantity don't need a lot of, but the female, according to quantity is important laws of nature, the male female born roughly, therefore, the probability of how to increa in female born quantity and reduce the number of male is critical. But this way, would cau the imbalance of female proportion, causing the natural ecological unbalance. When this technology applied to humans, a bigger problem. Some
cwrtime ago on cloning technology discussion shows that the gene cloning technology once ud to humans, may bring or cau trouble not even we can imagine.
透明翻译So, whether genetic ethics genetic engineering and gene technology conflict? Obviously not, becau genetic ethics and genetic technology to rve man this is esntially identical. Both requirements should make full u of gene technology for the benefit of mankind, and to generate as much as possible to avoid interfering all harmful to society phenomenon. Just different countries and regions, the degree to which and the proportion between the difference. For developing countries like China, it is not how focud try to overcome the genetic engineering of gene technology, the negative influence, but how to best possible u genetic engineering and gene technology economic development. For example, we all now know that biodiversity is the ba for sustainable development of nature, i.e., evolution is not to "balance the disadvantages of mutual coordination, but, is a diversified process, and the optimization is inevitable to monotonicity. However, at prent, genetic engineering major is among the best, obvious optimal with biological diversity direction in practice, and ran contrary indeed caud also stefan salvatore
dicethin怎么读音发音this problem. But, to the vast number of developing countries, so it has solved many very difficult realistic problem.
It can be learned, the establishment and development of genetic ethics not only won't block development of natural science, it will further enhance our understanding of the nature of science, will also help us to the truth, laws, causality new understanding. Obviously, genetic engineering is undoubtedly conform to the laws of nature. However, the result will to nature social sustainable development put forward tough challenges, this chapter for truth and by people scientific issues of depth. This question is actually a junction with something culture substantial contents of the problem. Several Nobel Prize for physics in the physicists about Chine traditional culture and western culture have said, the western natural science about "laws" concept and in the China traditional culture "reason" is "the same thing". In fact, if only from the phenomenon ems to yes, however, said mediocrity are very different up. Natural scientific law concept, mainly reflects the nature of the properties, and lf development in Chine traditional culture, the major reason of concept, it is a kind of sustainable development of social order. There is a com
mon side, this is about Chine traditional culture syncretic thoughts, in this ca, the society also can be regarded as part of the nature of generalized and follow nature. However, two also have many differences. On the one hand, nature does not in itlf will guide balanced, stable, orderly and sustainable development, as natural disasters is also performed about the same as the laws of nature, nature have not produced in before they eliminated many species. Cannot simply think that only man-made not abide by the laws of nature behavior will lead to sustainable development problems, and destruction that nature.
sampletext>neutrality
