2013 Text 4
On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday -adman- a modest policy victory for the Obama Aministration. But on the more important matter of the Constitution, the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upt the balance of power between the federal government and the states.
In Arizona v. United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law. The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization” and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial.福州雅思培训班 Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too clo to the federal sun. On the overturned provisions the majority held Congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.
However,连衣裙英语怎么写 the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement. That’s becau Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.
Two of the three objecting Justice -- Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas -- agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia, who offered an even more robust defen of state privileges going back to the Alien and Sedition Acts.stone cold
The 8-0 objection to President Obama tures on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking asrtion asrtion of federal executive power”. The White Hou argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White Hou claimed that it could invalidate any otherwi legitimate state law that it disagrees with.
Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could. It never did so.The administration was in esnce asrting that becau it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. [423 words]
36. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned becau they _____.
[A] disturbed the power balance between different states
[B] overstepped the authority of federal immigration law
[C] deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers
cigarette
[D] contradicted both the federal and state policies
37. On which of the following did the Justices agree,according to Paragraph4?
[A] Congress’s intervention in immigration enforcement.
[B] Federal officers’ duty to withhold immigrants’information..
[C] States’ legitimate role in immigration enforcement.
[D] States’ independence from federal immigration law
essay38. It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that the Alien and Sedition Acts ______.
[A] stood in favor of the states.
[B] supported the federal statute.
[C] undermined the states’ interests.
[D] violated the Constitution.
39. The White Hou claims that its power of enforcement ______.
[A] is dependent on the states’ support.
[B] is established by federal statutes.
[C] outweighs that held by the states.
[D] rarely goes against state laws.
spoil40. What can be learned from the last paragraph?
almost perfect[A] Immigration issues are usually decided by Congress.
[B] The Administration is dominant over immigration issues.
[C] Justices wanted to strengthen its coordination with Congress.
puyuma[D] Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.twista
