公共课英语一模拟题2020年(301)
(总分100,考试时间180分钟)去掉痘印的方法
阅读理解
A new book by a former lawyer at Kirkland & Ellis, one of the nation's largest law firms, has delivered a thrill to the already rattled legal profession. In The Lawyer Bubble: A Profession in Crisis, Steven J. Harper argues that legal jobs are disappearing not becau of short-term economic fluctuations but becau of powerful long-term trends. The word bubble is an overstatement, but Harper derves credit for sounding the alarm.
The decline in the market for lawyers is being driven by an array of forces. For some time now, corporate clients have been less willing to sign off on bulky legal bills. They have increasingly been balking at the top hourly rates of $1,000 that some partners charge. And as a result of globalization, an increasing share of American legal work is being shipped overas. Lawyers in India and other lower-wage markets are willing to do 百度英译汉
boobythe work for a fraction of what American law firms would charge. Taking away even more of this work: newly sophisticated legal software that can do "document review" and other tasks for which lawyers were once needed.
The legal market is without question soft the days. Last June, the Association for Legal Career Professionals relead a grim placement report stating that only 65.4% of law-school graduates had found jobs for which it was necessary to pass a state bar exam. And the Internet is full of first-hand accounts of law-school graduates who say that their law degree has not helped them get a law job—and, wor still, tho who report that their degree has actually hurt their job prospects, since some employers now tell them they are overqualified for nonlegal positions.
Harper argues that the profession's leaders are a big part of the problem. He contends that big-firm managers are too focud on maximizing profits for the biggest, most rainmaking partners—at the expen of junior lawyers and the long-term interest of the firm. And he faults law-school deans for putting the interests and salaries of law professors ahead of the interests of their underemployed, debt-laden students.
Controversial as it is, Harper's big-picture argument is undoubtedly correct, and it is a real cau for concern. Bar associations and legal academics have begun talking about how the profession should adapt—discussions that are long overdue. The biggest problem with The Lawyer Bubble is not the warning it is sounding but its title; unlike tulips and other speculative bubbles in the past, lawyers will always be a necessity not a fad. But then, The Very, Very Challenging Job Market for Lawyers doesn't have the same ring to it.
1. 1.The book The Lawyer Bubble: A Profession in Crisissilicon
A. has rattled legal profession.
B. is an exaggeration of the situation.iface
john sculleyC. has caud deeper concern.
D. is a big blow to legal profession.
2. 2.Which of the following statements is true of Paragraph 2?
戴维营
A. The decline of legal profession is driven by economic recession.
B. Globalization has pod a tremendous impact on lawyers in America
C. Many lawyers are unemployed with the introduction of legal software.
D. The downturn of legal profession is the outcome of a bunch of factors.
3. 3.It can be inferred in Paragraph 3 that a degree in law has
简爱电影A. always been difficult to finish **plete.
B. enabled law graduates to cure decent jobs.
C. actually hampered some graduates in the job market.
D. overqualified students for their future jobs.
4. 4.According to Steven J. Harper,
A. leaders in the legal profession are not to blame.
B. the legal profession will burst like a bubble.
C. the inequity in the profession should be adjusted.
D. lawyers are actually a fad not a necessity.
5. 5.The author thinks that Harper's argument in the book is
A. alarming yet exaggerating.
B. disputable yet reasonable.
C. controversial and doubtable.
D. correct and reasonable.
Public health officials grappling with the obesity epidemic have debated a wide range of approaches to helping slim the American waistline. To some degree, everything from building more sidewalks to banning chocolate milk has been explored. Yet few tactics havwhoknows
e been as polarizing as the possibility of introducing tariffs on treats. Despite endorment from veral respected obesity rearchers and politicians, soda taxes, for example, have been subject to vere scrutiny, as critics protested that implementing a tax before verifying that it would achieve the end result was shortsighted and potentially overreaching. So, in attempt to determine just how sin taxes might impact people's food choices, psychologists from the University of Buffalo decided to put junk food levies to the test—in the lab.
