Should we have national parks?
To begin with,national parks are necessary in that they can protect the variety of species and help us learn about the environment. Nevertheless ,someone argued that exploration of the national parks is damaging to the environment. So,should we have national parks? Here are some concrete opinions form bilateral standpoint.
People who oppo establishing national parks hold the view that wild areas should not be disturbed. They believed that the best way to maintain ecological balance is to keep nature in the raw. It is not reasonable to circle a range of land for protection . They strongly appeal to comply with wild world and actively respect its law rather than command it.
However the rebuttal put forward deems that the establishment of national parks aims to provide a safe home for native plants and animals. Without necessary protection,some rare animals such as rhinos become easy target of poachers. Besides,national parks usually ba on original environment and formed with hundreds of aboriginal landscape. Tho artificial buildings and facilities are just added for convenience. In this respect,establishing n
ational parks does not consort with natural laws.
考研复试辅导班星期三 英文
cet4准考证打印 Another argument of antis insists that exploration of the national parks is damaging to the environment. Constructions are bond to cau impact. As a counter,supporters refute that reasonable exploration can not only protect biodiversity,but also help people learn more about the environment. Landscape resource in national parks which has shown rarity and specificity is playing a significant role around the world.
Whether we should have national parks is a controversial topic all the time. Recent years an increasing number of people believe that as long as we make good u of national parks to protect plants and animals ,both environment and human begins can benefit a lot from them,so do I.
luck什么意思
周思佳
petio>specialized
责任感英文机械唯物主义>peril156001208
高考时间2021具体时间
