新gre总分

GRE写作评分标准

1

GRE写作评分标准

GRE写作评分标准及ISSUE/ARGUMENT分数权重细节解读，快来看看吧,下面小

编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

GRE写作评分标准及ISSUE/ARGUMENT分数权重细节解读

GRE写作算分基本公式介绍

新GRE写作要求考生在30分钟+30分钟内分别完成两篇文章，它是美国所有作

文考试中时间最长而质量要求最高的一类作文考试。GRE写作的记分方式是这样

的，两篇作文总分都是六分，计算公式为你的得分=(Issue的得分+Argument的得

分)/2，最终的计分是以0.5分为一个格。

GRE写作不同题型要求简介

ask(30min)，要求作者根据所给题目，完成一篇表明立场的逻辑立论文。

nttask(30min)，要求考生分析所给题目，完成一篇驳论文，指出并且

有力的驳斥题目中的主要逻辑错误。

GRE作文两篇文章分数权重分析

首先GRE写作两个部分在总分中的权重是一样的。新GRE作文中有两个项目，

最后出的GRE作文分数是一个，所以如何进行GRE作文算分呢?由于AA的写作

不牵涉自己观点的展开，只须指出作者逻辑上的漏洞，因此在经过训练以后，写

起来并不困难;而AI的写作需要自己展开自己设立的观点，不但需要逻辑上的洞

察能力，还需要论证观点的能力，语言组织的能力，因此对于中国考生来讲比较

困难，难以短期内有较大提高。

但是这两个部分在总分中的权重是一样的，因此考生的策略应该是尽量提高AI

部分的写作能力而力保AA部分满分(或高分)。因为如果AA部分满分的话，AI

部分只需争取在4分以上就可以保证整体作文分数在5分以上。

ETS写作评分标准概述

参照ETS评过分的范文，我们不难发现：无论是ISSUE还是ARGUMENT在评分标

准上都有共同之处。

1.观点要有深度，论证要有说服力;

2.组织要有条理，表达清晰准确;

3.语言流利，句式复杂，词汇丰富。

这三条分别说的是行文的“思想性”、“结构性”和“表达性”，众多高分作文的考生

大凡都在这三个方面做得很好，我们理所当然也要从这里入手，采取“各个击破”

的方法解剖GRE作文的本质，从而得到一个理想分数。

GRE作文分类题库-ISSUE

GRE写作评分标准

2

一教育类nshouldrequireallitsstudentstostudythesamenational

curriculumuntiltheyentercollegeratherthanallowschoolsindifferentpartsofthe

nationtodeterminewhichacademiccourstooffer.”

omeleadersingovernment,sports,industry,andotherareasattributetheir

successtoawell-developednofcompetition,asocietycanbetterprepareits

youngpeopleforleadershipbyinstillinginthemanofcooperation.

rtoimprovethequalityofinstructionatthecollegeanduniversitylevel,all

facultyshouldberequiredtospendtimeworkingoutsidetheacademicworldin

professionsrelevanttothecourstheyteach.

sitiesshouldrequireeverystudenttotakeavarietyofcoursoutsidethe

student’sfieldofstudybecauacquiringknowledgeofvariousacademicdisciplines

isthebestwaytobecometrulyeducated.

esanduniversitiesshouldoffermorecoursonpopularmusic,film,

advertising,andtelevisionbecaucontemporaryculturehasmuchgreaterrelevance

forstudentsthandoartsandliteratureofthepast.

imarilythroughformaleducationthataculturetriestoperpetuatetheideas

itfavorsanddiscredittheideasitfears.

ucationalsystemmphasizethedevelopmentofstudents’capacityfor

reasoningandlogicalthinking,butstudentswouldbenefitmorefromaneducation

thatalsotaughtthemtoexploretheirownemotions.

tenasrtedthatthepurpoofeducationistofreethemindandthespirit.

Inreality,however,formaleducationtendstorestrainourmindsandspiritsrather

thantthemfree.

unately,

wehavenotyetlearnedhowtoraichildrenwhocanhelpbringaboutabetter

society.

ionis

tooimportanttoleavesolelytoagroupofprofessionaleducators.

poofeducationshouldbetoprovidestudentswithavaluesystem,a

standard,atofideas—nottopreparethemforaspecificjob.

yshouldidentifythochildrenwhohavespecialtalentsandabilitiesand

begintrainingthematanearlyagesothattheycaneventuallyexcelintheirareasof

i,thetalentsarelikelytoremainundeveloped.

ghinnovationssuchasvideo,computers,andtheinternetemtooffer

GRE写作评分标准

3

schoolsimprovedmethodsforinstructingstudents,thetechnologiesalltoooften

distractfromreallearning.

GRE作文分类题库-ISSUE

二学习类suallylearnmuchmorefrompeoplewhoviewswe

eementcancau

stressandinhibitlearning.

dofstudycanadvancesignificantlyunlessoutsidersbringtheirknowledge

andexperiencetothatfieldofstudy.

quiresrealeffortand

courageistomoveintheoppositedirection-inotherwords,tomakethingsassimple

aspossible.

tsshouldmemoriesfactsonlyaftertheyhavestudiedtheideas,trends,and

tswhohavelearnedonlyfactshave

learnedverylittle.

rsandrearchesshouldnotbeconcernedwithwhethertheirworkmakesa

reimportantthattheypursuetheir

individualinterests,howeverunusualoridiosyncraticthointerestsmayem.

cademicareaorprofessionalfield,itisjustasimportanttorecognizethe

limitsofourknowledgeandunderstandingasitistoacquirenewfactsand

information.

nnotbealteredbyourwishes,ourinclinations,

orthedictatesofourpassions.

ould

questionwhattheyaretaughtinsteadofacceptingitpassively.

ervationissubjective;

itisalwaysguidedbytheobrver’xpectationsordesires.

anmindwillalwaysbesuperiortomachinesbecaumachinesareonly

toolsofhumanminds.

aljudgmentofwork,inanygivenfieldhaslittlevalueunlesscomesfrom

someonewhoisanexpertinthatfield.

whopursuetheirownintellectualinterestsforpurelypersonalreasonsare

morelikelytobenefittherestoftheworldthanarepeoplewhotrytoactforthe

publicgood.

alitydoesnotmeanthinkingsomethingthatwasneverthoughtbefore;it

GRE写作评分标准

4

meansputtingoldideastogetherinnewways.

studyingthediscipline,weethesameworldasbefore,butwithdifferenteyes.

studentsandscholarsinterpretthematerialstheyworkwithintheir

entinterpretationscome

aboutwhenpeoplewithdifferentpersonalitieslookatexactlythesameobjects,facts,

data,oreventsandedifferentthings.

quiremoreknowledge,thingsdonotbecomemorecomprehensible,but

morecomplexandmoremysterious.

ravemistaketotheorizebeforeonehasdata.

GRE作文分类题库-ISSUE

三行为类ghmanypeoplethinkthattheluxuriesandconveniences

ofcontemporarylifeareentirelyharmless,theyinfact,preventpeople

fromdevelopingintotrulystrongandindependentindividuals.

figuressuchasactors,politicians,andathletesshouldexpectpeopletobe

eyekapublicrole,theyshouldexpectthat

theywillloatleastsomeoftheirprivacy.

nganappealingimagehasbecomemoreimportantincontemporarysociety

thanistherealityortruthbehindthatimage.

ceptof‘individualresponsibility’ghsocieties

mustholdindividualsaccountablefortheirownactions,people’sbehaviorislargely

determinedbyforcesnotoftheirownmaking.

rkrequires

cooperation,whichmotivatespeoplemuchmorethanindividualcompetitiondoes.

ealmoflife-whetheracademic,social,business,orpolitical—theonlyway

tosucceedistotakeapractical,ratherthananidealistic,tic

behaviorguaranteessurvival,whereasidealisticviewstendtobesupercededby

simpler,moreimmediateoptions.

imarilythroughouridentificationwithsocialgroupsthatwedefineourlves.

roughmistakescantherebediscoveryorprogress.

oplerecognizethebenefitsofindividuality,butthefactisthatpersonal

economicsuccessrequiresconformity.

whoarethemostdeeplycommittedtoanideaorpolicyarethemost

criticalofit.

GRE写作评分标准

5

ntofinformationcaneliminateprejudicebecauprejudiceisrootedin

emotion,notreason.

tesntialqualityofaneffectiveleaderistheabilitytoremain

derwhois

quicklyandeasilyinfluencedbyshiftsinpopularopinionwillaccomplishlittle.

wholack

experiencearefreetoimaginewhatispossibleandthuscanapproachataskwithout

constraintsofestablishedhabitsandattitudes.

ivenfield,theleadingvoicescomefrompeoplewhoaremotivatednotby

convictionbutbythedesiretoprentopinionsandideasthatdifferfromthoheld

bythemajority.

waysanindividualwhoistheimpetusforinnovation;thedetailsmaybe

workedoutbyateam,buttrueinnovationresultsfromtheenterpriandunique

perceptionofanindividual.

s,whetheracademicorprofessional,involvesanabilitytosurviveinanew

environmentand--,eventually,--tochangeit.

oplechooacareeronthebasisofsuchpragmaticconsiderationsasthe

needsoftheeconomy,therelativeeaoffindingajob,andthesalarytheycan

anyoneisfreetochooacareerbadonhisorhernatural

talentsorinterestinaparticularkindofwork.

lisworthy,thenanymeanstakentoattainitisjustifiable.

oftenlookforsimilarities,evenbetweenverydifferentthings,andeven

d,athingshouldbeconsideredonits

ownterms,weshouldavoidthetendencytocompareittosomethingel.

aremistakenwhentheyassumethattheproblemstheyconfrontaremore

complexandchallengingthantheproblems,lusion

iventuallydispelledwithincreadknowledgeandexperience.

,oneshouldsay,

‘Moderationsismostthings,’sincemanyareasofhumanconcernrequireoratleast

profitfromintenfocus.

alty—whethertoone’s

friends,toone’sschoolorplaceofemployment,ortoanyinstitution—isalltoooften

adestructiveratherthanapositiveforce.

GRE写作评分标准

GRE写作评分标准

6

1.托福综合写作和独立写作异同

2.带你了解托福与雅思的区别