论文摘要翻译

学位论文数据集

摘要Abstract

ObjectivesWelectedmedicalinstitutionsatallecnomiclevels,suchasoccupational

diapreventionandtreatmentagencies,hospital,chemicalpoisoningtreatment

institutioninShandongProvinceastheobjectofrearchbycompletingthe"Surveyof

PoisoningEmergencyAbilityQuestionnaireinMedicalInstitutionsofShandong"and

"PoisoningStaffQuestionnaire".Toinvestigatetheemergentpoisoningmedical

institutionsinvolvedthepoisoningemergencysituation,includingtheconstructionof

poisoningcontrolprofessionalteams,detoxificationdrugrerves,rervesandtheu

ofpoisondetectionequipment,personalprotection,trainingexercisandotheraspects

chingliterature,wecanunderstandthenational,provincial

legislationandmanagementonpoisonscontrol,developthestrategiesforpoisoncontrol

inShandongProvince,andprovidethereferencefordevelopingthetreatmentofacute

poisoningpreventionmeasures.

目的本研究选取山东省各级综合性医疗机构、职业病防治机构、化学中毒救治机

构作为研究对象，应用《山东省医疗机构突发中毒事件应急能力调查问卷》和《中

毒救治人员调查表》，进行问卷调查，了解参与中毒救治医疗机构的突发中毒急救

现状，包括中毒控制专业队伍建没（theconstructionofprofessionalpoisoningcontrol

teams）、解毒药物储备、毒物检测设备储备及使用、个体防护、中毒的培训演练

（rehearsals等方面情况；通过文献检索（thedocuments），掌握国家、省关于毒

物立法、管理情况（wecanunderstandthelegislationandmanagementinpoisons

controlofournationandeachprovince，and）；制定山东省急性中毒控制策略和中

毒中心建设规划（formtheoutlines）方案，为山东省制定急性中毒治疗预防措施提

供（offersomereferencesforwhatmeasuresshouldbetakeninthetreatmentofacute

poisoningprevention）参考依据。

MethodsByusingmulti-clustersamplingmethodology,1201medicalinstitutions

wereslectedin17citiesofShandongProvince,andadopting/conducting（个人感觉形

式应保持一致）thelf-madequestionnaireaboutpoisoningemergencytreatment

retotally1318poisoningemergencytreatment

capacityquestionnairesweget,1201copiesofvalidquestionnairesresponrateof

94.1%,questionnairefficiencyrateof91.1%.The“Poisoningstaffsurvey"were

collected1800copies,1600copiesofvalidquestionnaires,efficiencyrateof91.1%.

（看下面对照）theuofstatisticalsoftwareEpiData3.0toestablishadataba,double

checkthedataentry,

SPSS18.0statisticalanalysisanddataprocessingtoinvestigatemedicalinstitutions

surveyedpoisoncontrolprofessionalteamofage,education,jobtitle,suddenpoisoning

emergencytraininganddrillsdifferencesbymultipleindependentsamplesnonparametric

testmethodKruskal-Wallis,twoindependentsamplesnonparametrictestmethodMann-

-wayvariance

analysisafterranktransformationwasudtocomparethedifferencesbetweensurveyed

medicalinstitutionsaboutthenumberandageofrescueequipment,firstaidability,

homogeneityofvarianceusingtheStudent-Newman-Keuls,heterogeneityofvariance

usingDunnett'-wayANOVAwasudtocomparethedifference

betweenthethreemedicalinstitutionsinfirstaidabilityandrerveofdrug

velα=0.05.

方法采用多层整群抽样研究方法，选取山东省17个地市参与中毒救治的医疗机

构1201家为调查对象，采用自制的中毒救治能力和中毒救治人员调查问卷进行调

查，共回收《山东省医疗机构突发中毒事件应急能力调查问卷》1318份，有效问

卷1201份，问卷回收率为42.4%，问卷有效率为91.1%。共回收《中毒救治人员

调查表》调查问卷1800份，有效问卷1600份，问卷有效率为88.9%（哪去

了?），（Therearetotally1318poisoningemergencytreatmentcapacityquestionnaires

weget,1201copiesofthemarevalidquestionnaireswhichreflecttherateof***is

94.1%（哪来的数据）,andindicatetherateofquestionnairefficiencyis91.1%.

1800copiesofthe“Poisoningstaffsurvey"werecollected,whichconsistof1600copies

validquestionnaires,thatillustratetherateofefficiencyis91.1%.）运用EpiData3.0统

计软件建立数据库，进行数据双人录入，并对数据进行逻辑分析和缺失值处理The

applicationofstatisticalsoftwareEpiData3.0establishes（ed）adataba,doublecheck

thedataentry,anddataanalysisandlogicmissingvaluesprocessing.将被调查机构和

人员按照2013年GDP分为高、中、低三组（第一、二、三阵营），运用

SPSS18.0对数据进行统计学分析和处理（Wehaveananalysisandarrangement

in……bythecomparisonbetween……and……），被调查医疗机构中毒控制专业

队伍年龄、学历、职称、突发中毒事件应急培训和演练差异情况，采用多组独立样

学位论文数据集

本非参数检验Kruskal-Wallis法，阵营间的两两比较采用两个独立样本非参数检验

Mann-Whitney法，被调查医疗机构抢救设备数量和使用年限、急救能力差异情

况，采用秩变换后单向方差分析，方差齐采用Student-Newman-Keuls，方差不齐采

用Dunnett’sT3法。被调查三级医疗机构急救能力和解毒药物储备差异情况，采用

单向方差分析。检验水准α=0.05。

Results①Thestructureofage,educationalbackground,jobtitleandpoisoning

ucture:First,thethirdcamps

werelessthanacondcamp,therewasnosignificantdifferencebetweenthecondand

thirdcamp;Educationalbackground:Thecondcampishigherthanthefirstcamp,and

thefirstcampismorethanthethirdcamp;Jobtitle:Thefirstandthethirdcampare

greaterthanthefirst,thereisnosignificantdifferencebetweenthefirstandthecond

ingtreatmentcapacity:thefirstcampismorethanthecond,the

condcampismorethanthethird.结果①三大阵营年龄结构、学历结构、职称结

构、中毒救治能力有显著性差异。年龄结构：第一、三阵营均小于第二阵营，第

二、第三阵营没有显著性（obvious，Google上是significant，你看着办吧，可能

人家的更正式一些）差异；学历结构：第二阵营学历高于第一阵营，且第一阵营大

于第三阵营；职称结构：第一、二cond阵营高于第三third阵营，第一、二阵营

没有显著性差异；救治能力：第一阵营大于第二、第三阵营，第二阵营大于第三阵

营。②Inmedicalinstitutionsofeachcamp,therearedifferencesinthenumberof

poisoningrescueequipmentisgastriclavageandheartdefibrillator,nodifferenceonthe

clavagemachine:Thefirstcampislessthanthecond,

thirdcamp,thereisnosignificantdifferencebetweenthecondandthethirdcamp;

cardiacdefibrillator:Thefirstcampismorethanthecondcamp,thecondcampis

redifferencesintheaverageufullifeofpoisoning

equipmentistheheartdefibrillatorsandmulti-parametermonitors,nodifferenceonthe

efibrillator:Thefirstcampislongerthanthecondcamp,

thecondcampislongerthanthethirdcamp,multi-parametermonitors:thefirstcamp

islongerthanthecond,thirdcamp,thereisnosignificantdifferencebetweenthe

condandthethirdcamp.②各阵营医疗机构中毒抢救设备储备数量存在差异的是

洗胃机和心脏除颤仪，其他设备储备数量上无差异性。洗胃机：第一阵营少于第

二、三阵营，第二、第三阵营无显著性差异；心脏除颤仪：第一阵营多于第二阵

营，第二阵营多于第三阵营。各阵营医疗机构中毒抢救设备平均使用年限存在差异

的是心脏除颤仪和多参数监护仪，其他设备平均使用年限无差异性。心脏除颤仪：

第一阵营长于第二阵营，第二阵营长于第三阵营，多参数监护仪：第一阵营长于第

二、三阵营，第二、第三阵营无显著性差异。③Poisoningtreatmentcapacityhasa

significantdifferenceinmedicalinstitutionsofeachcamp,thefirstcampisgreaterthan

thecondandthethirdcamp,ary

healthcareofeachcamp,therearedifferencesinpoisoningtreatmentability,thefirst

campisgreaterthanthecondandthirdcamp,thecondcampisgreaterthanthethird

ondaryandtertiarymedicalinstitutionsofeachcampdonotexist

significantdifferences.③各阵营中毒救治能力有显著性差异，第一阵营高于第二、

三阵营，第二阵营高于第三阵营。各阵营一级医疗机构中毒救治能力存在显著性差

异，第一阵营高于第二、三阵营，第二阵营高于第三阵营。各阵营二级、三级医疗

机构中毒救治能力不存在显著性差异。④Therervecapacityofdrugdetoxification

ineachcamphassignificantdifference,thefirstcampisstrongerthanthecondandthe

snosignificantdifferencebetweenthecondandthethird(同样的词在英

语中不宜重复，读者已经明白你所讲的阵营Camp，thus,personallyspeaking，it

shouldbeomitted.).therervecapacityofdrugdetoxificationinprimaryhealthcareof

eachcamphassignificantdifferences,thefirstisstrongerthanthecond,thefirstis

strongerthanthethird,thereisnosignificantdifferencebetweenthecondandthethird

mptwo,threemedicalinstitutionsPoisoningcapacitydoesnotexist

ondaryandtertiarymedicalinstitutionsofeachcampdo

notexistsignificantdifferences.④各阵营解毒药物储备能力有显著性差异，第一阵

营强于第二、三阵营，第二阵营与第三阵营无明显差异hasasignificant

difference。一级医疗机构中各阵营解毒药物储备能力有显著性差异，第一阵营强

于第二阵营，第一阵营强于第三阵营，第二阵营与第三阵营无明显差异。各阵营二

级、三级医疗机构中毒救治能力不存在显著性差异。⑤Eachcamppoisoning

emergent（换成形容词）

primaryhealthcare,thecondaryandtertiarymedicalinstitutionsofeachcampdonot

exist（换成haveno）significantdifferences.⑤各阵营突发(emergency就是紧急事

件，sudden就没有必要了吧！)中毒应急培训与应急演练情况无显著性差异，各阵

营一级、二级、三级医疗机构培训和演练情况均无显著性差异。

学位论文数据集

ConclusionsTherearesignificantdifferencesinpoisoningcapacityamongthemedical

institutionsinregionsofdifferenteconomiclevels,suddenpoisoningemergencytraining

tostrengthenaidequipment,supplies,

needtostrengthenthe

poisoncontrolteambuilding,drugdetoxificationandrescueequipmentrerves,improve

theleveloftreatmentandtreatmentcapacitythroughtraininganddrills.结论不同经济

水平地区医疗机构的急救能力存在显著性差异，Inthisrearch,itindicatesthatthere

aresignificantdifferencesinpoisoningcapacityamongthemedicalinstitutionsofdifferent

economiclevelsofeachregion，poisoningemergenttrainingsanddrillsareinthesame.

而中毒培训演练没有差异，需加强中低经济水平地区急救设备、物资、人员等配

备，加强中毒控制队伍建设、解毒药物和解毒药物储备，通过培训和演练提高救治

能力和救治水平。Weneedtostrengthen（addmorepowerintheareaof）aid

equipment,supplies,personnelbuildingamongthelowereconomiclevelofeachregion.

Thepoisoncontrolteambuilding,drugdetoxificationandrescueequipmentrervesarein

needbadly,suchanimprovementoftheleveloftreatmentandtreatmentcapacitycanbe

achievedthroughtrainingsanddrills.

Figure15;Table23;Reference34

Keywords:Occupationalstress;Migrantworkers;Workfatigue

图15幅；表（Chart）23个；参34篇。

关键词：中毒；医疗机构；急救；应急

分类号：R1

Chinebookscatalog:(要是是参考书目的意思personally

thinking，”Bibliography”shouldbeudinthisformalessay.）

◇注：大部分红色字体为yoursand蓝色字体为mine。本文纯属个人理解若有

偏差，请各位同仁给予建议！

Editor：Jeremy