2022年份硕士考研英语阅读理解

2022年份硕士考研英语阅读理解

每门学科都有其特点，英语考研，需要多背多记多练，但是考研

又不是一般的考试,所以方法与耐烦缺一不行.下面我给大家带来关

于2022硕士考研英语阅读理解，期望会对大家的工作与学习有所关

怀。

考研英语阅读理解

(一)法律类

Byalmosteverymeasure,PaulPfingstisanunsentimental

ektheSanDiegoCountydistrictattorney

saidhefullyintendstotrysuspectCharlesAndrewWilliams,

15,

beforethetragedy,Pfingsthadstoodbehindthecontroversial

Californialawthatmandatestreatingmurdersuspectsasyoung

as14asadults.

SonobodywouldhavewageredthatPfingstwouldalsobethe

chhisveryownInnocenceProject.

YetlastJune,Pfingsttoldhisattorneystogobackoverold

murderandrapeconvictionsandseeifanyunravelwithnewly

rwords,hewantedto

revisitpastvictories--thistimeplayingfortheotherteam.

Ithinkpeoplemisunderstandbeingconservativeforbeing

biased,dermyselfapragmaticguy,and

第1页

Ihavenointerestinputtinginnocentpeopleinjail.

AroundtheU.S.,flabbergasteddefenseattorneysandtheir

rosecutors,however,

ll,eachDAtestcostsas

muchas$5,erestheunspokenrisk:ifdozensof

innocentsturnup,veindictedhisshop.

Butninemonthslater,nobudgetshavebeenbustedor

ts

teamconsidersconvictionsbefore1993,whenthecitystarted

scardcasesifthedefendanthas

560remainingfiles,theyhave

re-examined200,lookingforcaseswithbiologicalevidenceand

defendantswhostillclaiminnocence.

tcompelling

involvesamanserving12yearsformolestingagirlwhowas

erswerethereatthetime.

Policefoundasmalldropofsalivaonthevictimsshirt--too

hatspotcouldfreea

edbySanDiego,10

rtingDAaudits.

ByAmandaRipleyeznciscosijevicrtwell;LisaMcLaughlin;

JosephPierro;JoshTyrangielandSoraSong

第2页

本文习题命题仿照对象2022年真题

PfingstcarryouthisownInnocenceProject?

[A]Bygettingridofhisbiasagainstthesuspects.

[B]Byrevisitingthepastvictories.

[C]ByusingthenewlydevelopedDA-testingtools.

[D]Byhiscooperationwithhisattorneys.

fthefollowingcanbeanadvantageofInnocence

Project?

[A]Tohelpcorrectthewrongjudgments.

[B]Toousttheunqualifiedprosecutors.

[C]Tomaketheprosecutorsinanawkwardsituation.

[D]Tocheerupthedefenseattorneysandtheirjailed

clients.

ression“flabbergasted〞(Line1,Paragraph3)

mostprobablymeans_______.

[A]excited

[B]competent

[C]embarrassed

[D]astounded

Pfingstanunsentimentalprosecutor?

[A]Heintendedtotryafifteen-yearoldsuspect.

[B]Hehadnointerestinputtingtheinnocentinjail.

第3页

[C]HesupportedthecontroversialCalifornialaw.

[D]Hewantedtotrysuspectasyoungasfourteen.

fthefollowingisnottrueaccordingtothetext?

[A]Pfingst’smovedidn’thaveagreatcoverage.

[B]Pfingst’smovehadboththepositiveandnegative

effect.

[C]Pfingst’smovedidn’tworkwell.

[D]Pfingst’smovegreatlyencouragedthejailedprisoners.

篇章剖析

本文承受的是记叙文的模式。第一段指出芬斯特作为一位铁面无

私的检查官的一些做法;其次段指出芬斯特实施“清白预备〞的预备

及做法;第三段指出实施“清白预备〞造成的反响以及可能存在的问

题;第四段和第五段是实施“清白预备〞的结果和影响。

词汇解释

prosecutor[5prRsIkju:tE(r)]n.检察官,检察员,起诉人,原

告

controversial[kRntrE5v:F(E)l]adj.争辩的,争议的

mandate[5mAndeIt]v.批准制订一个训令，如通过法律;发布指

令或要求：

wager[5weIdVE(r)]v.下赌注,保证

conviction[kEn5vIkF(E)n]n.定罪,宣告有罪

unravel[Qn5rAv(E)l]v.说明,解决

第4页

flabbergast[5flAbE^B:st;(?@)-^Ast]v.口使大吃一惊,

第5页

哑然失,使目瞪口呆

indict[In5daIt]v.起诉,控告,指控,揭露

bust[bQst]v.破产或缺钱

oust[aJst]v.剥夺,取代,驱除

discard[dI5skB:d]v.抛开;遗弃;废弃

molest[mE5lest]v..,困扰,调戏

saliva[sE5laIvE]n.口水,唾液

难句突破

forethetragedy,Pfingsthadstoodbehindthe

controversialCalifornialawthatmandatestreatingmurder

suspectsasyoungas14asadults.

主体句式：…Pfingsthadstoodbehind…

构造分析：Evenbeforethetragedy是本句的时间状语;主句

是Pfingsthadstoodbehind…;that引导的宾语从句修饰law;在

从句中，as…as是一词组，意思是“和…一样〞;毁灭的第三个as

是介词，意思是“作为〞。

句子译文：甚至在这场悲剧发生之前芬斯特就支持加利福尼亚州

的一项颇有争议的法律。这项法律规定，以成人身份受审的谋杀嫌疑

犯的最低年龄可以降到十四岁。

题目分析

1.答案为C，属事实详情题。文中对应信息“Pfingsttoldhis

attorneystogobackoveroldmurderandrapeconvictionsand

第5页

seeifanyunravelwithnewlydevelopedDA-testingtools.〞

是对其次段第一句的补充说明。

2.答案为A，属推理推断题。从上下文我们可以得知，实施“清

白预备〞就是使用先进的DA技术来重新审理过去的案件当中可能

存在的冤案错案。

3.答案为D,属猜词题。从其次段第一句话我们得知芬斯特可能

是美国第一个实施特殊独特的“清白预备〞的人，因此他的做法很可

能是令人感到惊异的，从而可猜出该词的含义。

4.答案为B，属推理推断题。从第一段和其次段给出的事例我们

可以看出，芬斯特不愿放过任何一个犯罪的人，即便他的年龄还不算

大;他也不愿使无辜者蒙冤，即便案件已经审理。

5.答案为C，属推理推断题。正由于“Pfingst’smoveworks

well〞,美国才又有“tenothercountiesarestartingDA

audits〞,而且，“nobudgetshavebeenbustedorprosecutors

ousted〞.

考研英语真题——18阅读最难篇

Passage3

Sciencehaslonghadanuneasyrelationshipwithother

fGallileos17th-centurytrialfor

hisrebellingbeliefbeforetheCatholicChurchofpoetWilliam

BlakesharshremarksagainstthemechanisticworldviewofIsaac

ismbetweenscienceandthehumanities

第6页

has，ifanything，deepenedinthiscentury.

Untilrecently，thescientificcommunitywassopowerful

fundingforsciencehasdeclined，scientistshaveattacked

“antiscience〞inseveralbooks，notablyHigherSuperstition，

，abiologistattheUniversityofVirginia，

andormanLevitt，amathematicianatRutgersUniversity;and

TheDemon-HauntedWorld，byCarSaganofCornellUniversity.

Defendersofsciencehavealsovoicedtheirconcernsat

meetingssuchas“TheFlightfromScienceandReason，〞held

inewYorkCityin1995，and“ScienceintheAge

of(Mis)information，〞whichassembledlastJunenearBuffalo.

Antiscienceclearlymeansdifferentthingstodifferent

ndLevittfindfaultprimarilywithsociologists，

philosophersandotheracademicswhohavequestionedsciences

smoreconcernedwiththosewhobelievein

ghosts，creationismandotherphenomenathatcontradictthe

scientificworldview.

Asurveyofnewsstoriesin1996revealsthattheantiscience

taghasbeenattachedtomanyothergroupsaswell，from

第7页

authoritieswhoadvocatedtheeliminationofthelast

remainingstocksofsmallpoxvirustoRepublicanswhoadvocated

decreasedfundingforbasicresearch.

FewwoulddisputethatthetermappliestotheUnabomber，

whosemanifesto，publishedin1995，scornsscienceandlongsfor

elythatdoesnot

meanenvironmentalistsconcernedaboutuncontrolled

industrialgrowthareantiscience，asanessayinUSewsWorld

ReportlastMayseemedtosuggest.

Theenvironmentalists，inevitably，respondtosuchcritics.

Thetrueenemiesofscience，arguesPaulEhrlichofStanford

University，apioneerofenvironmentalstudies，arethosewho

questiontheevidencesupportingglobalwarming，thedepletion

oftheozonelayerandotherconsequencesofindustrialgrowth.

Indeed，someobserversfearthattheantiscienceepithetisin

dangerofbecomingmeaningless.“Thetermantisciencecanlump

togethertoomany，quitedifferentthings，〞notesHarvard

UniversityphilosopherGeraldHoltoninhis1993workScience

andAnti-Science.“Theyhaveincommononlyonethingthatthey

tendtoannoyorthreatenthosewhoregardthemselvesasmore

enlightened.〞

horsattitudetowardtheissueof“sciencevs.

第8页

antiscience〞is.

ng

这道题涉及对“科学pk其它文化〞这个冲突的看法。从第一段

的开头就能看出，只是以局外人的姿势，指出两者之间的冲突严峻，

应当是中立看法;再者，依据上面对文章主题两层语义的分析，既指

出科学家的还击，也指出他们的过火，换言之，的协商是很辨证的，

是客观中立的。综合起来，答案选A“中立的〞。

能承受吗?同学们要学会正确地分析文章的主旨和的倾向，从而

把题目作对。

第9页